Original Article
Georgia Prenatal Care Providers’ Perceptions of Barriers to Sexually Transmitted Disease Screening
Abstract
Background Evidence suggests that sexually transmitted disease (STD) screening during pregnancy is not optimal. No published studies have systematically examined barriers that hinder routine STD screening. This study examines prenatal care providers’ perceptions about barriers to routine STD screening of pregnant women. Methods Using a conceptual framework, four a priori barrier categories were developed: provider, patient, organizational, and structural. Responses to a question on barriers to STD screening in a 1998 mail survey of Georgia prenatal care providers were qualitatively classified into one of these categories. Results Of the 293 providers who responded, 71% identified structural barriers, with 52% citing inadequate reimbursement. These respondents were most likely to name barriers categorized as structural, not patient, provider, or organization issues. Conclusion Efforts to improve STD screening of pregnant women should include a focus on structural level interventions, such as instituting health care policies that provide adequate reimbursement for routine STD screening during pregnancy.This content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($25)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.
References
1. Watts DH, Brunham RC. Sexually transmitted diseases including HIV infection in pregnancy, in Holmes KK, Sparling PF, Mårdh PA, et al (eds): Sexually Transmitted Diseases. New York, McGraw-Hill Health Professions Division, 1999, ed 3, pp 1089–1132.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1998 guidelines for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases. MMWR Recomm Rep 1998; 47( RR-1): 1–111.
3. American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Human Immunodeficiency Virus Screening (RE9916): Joint Statement of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Policy Statement). Elk Grove Village, IL, American Academy of Pediatrics, July 1999. Available at: http://www.aap.org/policy/re9916.html. Accessed June 23, 2003.
4. American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for Perinatal Care. Elk Grove Village, IL, American Academy of Pediatrics, and Washington, DC, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2002, ed 5.
5. Weisbord JS, Koumans EH, Toomey KE, et al. Sexually transmitted diseases during pregnancy: Screening, diagnostic, and treatment practices among prenatal care providers in Georgia. South Med J 2001; 94: 47–53.
6. Mills WA, Martin DL, Bertrand JR, et al. Physicians’ practices and opinions regarding prenatal screening for human immunodeficiency virus and other sexually transmitted diseases. Sex Transm Dis 1998; 25: 169–175.
7. Cohen SJ, Halvorson HW, Gosselink CA. Changing physician behavior to improve disease prevention. Prev Med 1994; 23: 284–291.
8. Walsh JM, McPhee SJ. A systems model of clinical preventive care: An analysis of factors influencing patient and physician. Health Educ Q 1992; 19: 157–175.
9. Makrides L, Veinot PL, Richard J, et al. Primary care physicians and coronary heart disease prevention: A practice model. Patient Educ Couns 1997; 32: 207–217.
10. Ary D, Jacobs LC, Razavieh A. Qualitative and historic research, in Introduction to Research in Education. Fort Worth, TX, Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1996, ed 5, pp 474–496.
11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Epidemiology Program Office, Division of Public Health Surveillance and Informatics. Epi Info version 6.04 [software program]. Atlanta, GA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1997.
12. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999; 282: 1458–1465.
