Review Article

In the Lymelight: Law and Clinical Practice Guidelines

Authors: Susan Ronn JD

Abstract

Abstract:Almost from the beginning, the Ixodes scapularis and I pacificus, adult deer ticks, have been a breeding ground not only for Lyme disease, but also for political dissent. Most recently, the battleground moved into the arena of clinical practice guidelines. Both camps in the “Lyme Wars”—the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society (ILADS)—have published Lyme disease practice guidelines. The guidelines conflict regarding diagnosis and treatment. The state of Connecticut’s Attorney General’s office conducted an investigation, under antitrust laws, into the development and promulgation of IDSA’s 2006 guidelines. In an unprecedented move, IDSA and the AG have entered into a legal agreement that necessitates a rethinking of the guidelines, requiring a new review panel reflecting balanced, conflict-of-interest-free perspectives on Lyme disease.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

References1.Blumenthal R. Attorney general’s investigation reveals flawed Lyme disease guideline process, IDSA agrees to reassess guidelines, install independent arbiter. State of Connecticut: Attorney General’s Office; May 1, 2008. Available at: http://www.ct.gov/ag/cwp/view.asp?A=2795&Q=414284. Accessed January 20, 2009.2.Wormser GP, Dattwyler RJ, Sapiro ED, et al. The clinical assessment, treatment, and prevention of Lyme disease, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2006;43:1089–1134.WormserGP]]DattwylerRJ]]SapiroED&etal;The clinical assessment, treatment, and prevention of Lyme disease, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.Clin Infect Dis2006431089-11343.Cameron D, Gaito A, Harris N, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for the management of Lyme disease. Expert Rev Anti infect Ther 2004;2(1 suppl):S1–S13.CameronD]]GaitoA]]HarrisN&etal;Evidence-based guidelines for the management of Lyme disease.Expert Rev Anti infect Ther20042S1-S134.Lyme disease—United States, 2001–2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004;53:365–369. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5317a4.htm. Accessed February 20, 2009.5.Tonks A. Lyme Wars. BMJ 2007;335:910–912.TonksALyme Wars.BMJ2007335910-9126.Noble HB. Questioning long-term Lyme cases. New York Times. May 23, 2000. Available at: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9A0DE5D91E3AF930A15756C0A9669C8B63. Accessed February 20, 2009.7.Feder HM Jr, Johnson BJ, O’Connell S, et al. A critical appraisal of “chronic Lyme disease.” N Engl J Med 2007;357:1422–1430.FederHMJr]]JohnsonBJ]]O’ConnellS&etal;A critical appraisal of “chronic Lyme disease.”N Engl J Med20073571422-14308.Dumoff A. Further developments in the battle over treatment standards for Lyme disease. Altern Complement Ther 2007;13:157–162.DumoffAFurther developments in the battle over treatment standards for Lyme disease.Altern Complement Ther200713157-1629.Cooper JD, Feder HM. Inaccurate information about lyme disease on the internet. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2004;23:1105–1108. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/lyme/resources/LD_internet.pdf. Accessed June 7, 2008.10.Wormser GP, Naddelman RB, Dattwyler RJ, et al. Practice guidelines for the treatment of Lyme disease. Clin Infect Dis 2000;31(suppl 1):S1–14.WormserGP]]NaddelmanRB]]DattwylerRJ&etal;Practice guidelines for the treatment of Lyme disease.Clin Infect Dis200031S1-1411.ILADS demands retraction of IDSA Lyme guidelines. Available at: http://www.ilads.org/files/press_release_10_25_06.pdf. Accessed January 20, 2009.12.Stricker RB, Johnson L. The American Academy of Neurology Lyme guidelines: through the looking glass. [Southern Medical Association website.] Available at: http://www.sma.org/smj/rapidresponse/response_content.cfm?objectid=F9994DF0-1109-A387-609549B958B6333E&responseID=F99EB925-1109-A387-605C0E7EBD9111BA. Accessed January 20, 2009.13.State of Connecticut public hearing on insurance coverage of Lyme disease. February 24, 1999. Available at: http://www.ct.gov/ag/cwp/view.asp?A=1774&Q=282848. Accessed February 20, 2009.14.Crane M. Doctor discipline—or “medical McCarthyism”? Med Econ 2001;6:51–52.CraneMDoctor discipline—or “medical McCarthyism”?Med Econ2001651-5215.Fred HL. “Chronic” dishonesty in medicine? Tax Heart Inst J 2008;35:226.FredHL“Chronic” dishonesty in medicine?Tax Heart Inst J20083522616.Kish MA; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Guide to development of practice guidelines. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32:851–854.KishMAInfectious Diseases Society of AmericaGuide to development of practice guidelines.Clin Infect Dis200132851-85417.An agreement between the attorney general of the state of Connecticut and the infectious diseases society of America. Available at: http://www.ct.gov/ag/lib/ag/health/idsaagreement.pdf. Accessed February 17, 2009.18.Agreement ends Lyme disease investigation by Connecticut attorney general. May 1, 2008. Available at: http://www.idsociety.org/Content.aspx?id=11182. Accessed January 20, 2009.19.Cameron DJ. Letter to membership regarding Connecticut attorney general’s findings. May 9, 2008. Available at: http://www.ilads.org/files/2008/Letter_to_Membership_05_09_08.pdf. Accessed January 20, 2009.20.Statement from IDSA on selection of panelists for review. January 26, 2009. Available at: http://www.idsociety.org/Content.aspx?id=13310. Accessed February 20, 2009.21.Lyme organizations: new IDSA guidelines panel, unbalanced & biased: congressman and patient groups voice concerns. January 28, 2009. Available at: http://www.lymedisease.org/news/lyme_disease_press/39.html. Accessed February 4, 2009.22.IDSA Lyme disease review panel announces public input period and hearing date. February 2, 2009. Available at: http://www.idsociety.org/Content.aspx?id=13352. Accessed February 20, 2009.23.HB 5625.24.State laws/policies/regulations enacted. [Lyme Disease Association website]. Available at: http://www.lymediseaseassociation.org/IB_State.html. Accessed January 20, 2009.