Original Article
Influence of Back Pain on Patient Satisfaction Scores
Abstract
Objectives: Patient satisfaction scores are increasing in importance. Although the influence of selected patient and physician characteristics on satisfaction scores has been identified, the impact of different pediatric diagnoses is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare patient satisfaction scores in visits for mechanical back pain with visits for clubfoot or scoliosis.Methods: A retrospective analysis of patient satisfaction scores from pediatric visits for back pain, clubfoot, and scoliosis at three tertiary centers was performed. Satisfaction data were obtained from survey questions that used a 5-point scale ranging from very poor (1) to very good (5). Statistical analysis was performed using χ 2 and Fisher exact tests.
Results: Data from 565 visits for scoliosis, 81 for clubfoot, and 57 for mechanical back pain were used. The mean scores in back pain visits for the likelihood of recommending the care provider, confidence in the care provider, and explanation by the care provider were 4.87, 4.79, and 4.70, respectively. These scores were not lower than visits for scoliosis and clubfoot ( P < 0.05). The mean score for likelihood to recommend the practice after back pain visits was 4.73, with more scores of 3 or higher than clubfoot or scoliosis ( P < 0.05).
Conclusions: Satisfaction scores in pediatric patients with back pain were not lower than visits for scoliosis or clubfoot. Future research can be directed toward identifying common goals in visits for pediatric mechanical back pain to further improve the patient experience.
This content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($25)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.
References
1. Atkins PM, Marshall BS, Javalgi RG. Happy employees lead to loyal patients. Survey of nurses and patients shows a strong link between employee satisfaction and patient loyalty. J Health Care Mark 1996;16:14-23.
2. Bredart A, Bottomley A. Treatment satisfaction as an outcome measure in cancer clinical treatment trials. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2002;2:597-606.
3. Fottler MD, Ford RC, Bach SA. Measuring patient satisfaction in healthcare organizations: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc 1997;2:227-239.
4. Hall JA, Dornan MC. Patient sociodemographic characteristics as predictors of satisfaction with medical care: a meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med 1990;30:811-818.
5. Jones TO, Sasser WE. Why satisfied customers defect. Harv Bus Rev 1995:88-99.
6. Kinney WC. A simple and valuable approach for measuring customer satisfaction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;133:169-172.
7. Otani K, Waterman B, Faulkner KM, et al. Patient satisfaction: focusing on ‘‘excellent.’’ J Healthc Manag 2009;54:93-103.
8. Reichheld FF. The one number you need to grow. Harv Bus Rev 2003;81:46-54, 124.
9. Rahmqvist M. Patient satisfaction in relation to age, health status and other background factors: a model for comparisons of care units. Int J Qual Health Care 2001;13:385-390.
10. Jackson JL, Chamberlin J, Kroenke K. Predictors of patient satisfaction. Soc Sci Med 2001;52:609-620.
11. Saila T, Mattila E, Kaila M, et al. Measuring patient assessments of the quality of outpatient care: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract 2008;14:148-154.
12. Zapka JG, Palmer RH, Hargraves JL, et al. Relationships of patient satisfaction with experience of system performance and health status. J Ambul Care Manage 1995;18:73-83.
13. Perez de los Cobos J, Fidel G, Escuder G, et al. A satisfaction survey of opioid-dependent clients at methadone treatment centres in Spain. Drug Alcohol Depend 2004;73:307-313.
14. Olsen TL, Anderson RL, Dearwater SR, et al. The epidemiology of low back pain in an adolescent population. Am J Public Health 1992;82:606-608.
15. Linton S. Understanding Pain for Better Clinical Practice: A Psychological Perspective. New York: Elsevier; 2005.
16. Bush T, Cherkin D, Barlow W. The impact of physician attitudes on patient satisfaction with care for low back pain. Arch Fam Med 1993;2:301-305.
17. Vangronsveld KL, Linton SJ. The effect of validating and invalidating communication on satisfaction, pain and affect in nurses suffering from low back pain during a semi-structured interview. Eur J Pain 2012;16:239-246.
18. Linder-Pelz SU. Toward a theory of patient satisfaction. Soc Sci Med 1982;16:577-582.
19. Anderson R, Barbara A, Feldman S. What patients want: a content analysis of key qualities that influence patient satisfaction. J Med Pract Manage 2007;22:255-261.
20. WongWS, Fielding R. The association between patient satisfaction and quality of life in Chinese lung and liver cancer patients. Med Care 2008;46:293-302.
21. Deyo RA, Diehl AK. Patient satisfaction with medical care for low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1986;11:28-30.
22. Howard LM, Wessely S. Reappraising reassurance--the role of investigations. J Psychosom Res 1996;41:307-311.
23. Donovan JL, Blake DR. Qualitative study of interpretation of reassurance among patients attending rheumatology clinics: ‘‘just a touch of arthritis, doctor?’’ BMJ 2000;320:541-544.
24. Epstein RM, Shields CG, Meldrum SC, et al. Physicians’ responses to patients’ medically unexplained symptoms. Psychosom Med 2006;68:269-276.
25. Sitzia J, Wood N. Response rate in patient satisfaction research: an analysis of 210 published studies. Int J Qual Health Care 1998;10:311-317.
26. Cherkin D, Deyo RA, Berg AO. Evaluation of a physician education intervention to improve primary care for low-back pain. II. Impact on patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1991;16:1173-1178.
