Original Article

Inpatient Rehabilitation Centers and Concern for Increasing Volume of Ischemic Stroke Patients Requiring Rehabilitation

Authors: James E. Siegler, MD, Amelia K. Boehme, MSPH, Bethena D. Fowler, MPH, Alexander J. George, BS, Dominique J. Monlezun, BA, Karen C. Albright DO, MPH, T. Mark Beasley, PhD, Sheryl Martin-Schild MD, PhD

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether prolonged length of stay (pLOS) in ischemic stroke is related to delays in discharge disposition arrangement.

Methods: We designed a retrospective study to compare patients with acute ischemic stroke who experienced pLOS to those who did not experience pLOS. Patients who have had acute ischemic stroke between July 2008 and December 2010 were included unless they arrived >48 hours after time last seen normal, had an unknown last seen normal, or experienced an in-hospital stroke. pLOS was defined in our prospective stroke registry (before the generation of this research question) as hospitalization extended for ≥24 hours more than necessary to determine neurologic stability and next level of care/disposition for a given patient. We characterized the frequency of each cause of pLOS and further investigated the destinations that were more frequently associated with pLOS among patients with delay resulting from arranging discharge disposition.

Results: Of the 274 patients included, 106 (31.9%) had pLOS. Reasons for pLOS were discharge disposition (48.1%), non-neurologic medical complications (36.8%), delays in imaging studies (20.8%), awaiting procedure (10.4%), and neurologic complications (9.4%). Among patients with pLOS caused by delayed disposition, more than half were awaiting placement in an inpatient rehabilitation facility.

Conclusions: For the majority of our patients, pLOS was caused by acquired medical complications and delayed disposition, most commonly inpatient rehabilitation. Further efforts are needed to prevent complications and further investigation is necessary to identify the factors that may contribute to delayed discharge to inpatient rehabilitation facilities, which may include delayed planning or heightened scrutiny of insurance companies regarding their beneficiaries.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012; 125: e2–e220.
 
2. Ifejika-Jones NL, Harun N, Mohammed-Rajput NA, et al. Thrombolysis with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator predicts a favorable discharge disposition in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2011; 42: 700–704.
 
3. Kleindorfer DO, Khoury J, Moomaw CJ, et al. Stroke incidence is decreasing in whites but not in blacks: a population-based estimate of temporal trends in stroke incidence from the Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Stroke Study. Stroke. 2010; 41: 1326–1331.
 
4. Koton S, Bornstein NM, Tsabari R, et al. Derivation and validation of the prolonged length of stay score in acute stroke patients. Neurology. 2010; 74: 1511–1516.
 
5. Siegler JE, Boehme AK, Dorsey AM, et al. A comprehensive stroke center patient registry: advantages, limitations, and lessons learned. Med Stud Res J. 2013; 2: 21–29.
 
6. Gubitz G, Phillips S, Aguilar E. Discharge disposition of patients on an acute stroke unit. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 1999; 8: 330–335.
 
7. Aguiar C, Lisk C. Assessing payment adequacy: inpatient rehabilitation facility services.www.medpac.gov/chapters/Mar12_Ch09.pdfwww.medpac.gov/chapters/Mar12_Ch09.pdf. Published 2012. Accessed October 21, 2013
 
8. Aguiar C, Lisk C. Assessing payment adequacy: inpatient rehabilitation facility services.http://www.medpac.gov/transcripts/IRF%20January%202012%20presentation_Public%20slides%20final.pdfhttp://www.medpac.gov/transcripts/IRF%20January%202012%20presentation_Public%20slides%20final.pdf Published January 12, 2012. Accessed November 7, 2013
 
9. Hall MJ, Levant S, DeFrances CJ. Hospitalization for Stroke in U.S. Hospitals, 1989–2009. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2012; .NCHS data brief no. 95
 
10. Maulden SA, Gassaway J, Horn SD, et al. Timing of initiation of rehabilitation after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: S34–S40.
 
11. Horn SD, DeJong G, Smout RJ, et al. Stroke rehabilitation patients, practice, and outcomes: is earlier and more aggressive therapy better? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: S101–S114.
 
12. Dobrez D, Heinemann AW, Deutsch A, et al. Impact of Medicare’s prospective payment system for inpatient rehabilitation facilities on stroke patient outcomes. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010; 89: 198–204.
 
13. Linehan K. Medicare’s post-acute care payment: a review of the issues and policy proposals. Issue Brief George Wash Univ Natl Health Policy Forum. 2012; 847: 1–23.
 
14. Westendorp WF, Vermeij JD, Vermeij F, et al. Antibiotic therapy for preventing infections in patients with acute stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 1: CD008530
 
15. Chen CM, Hsu HC, Tsai WS, et al. Infections in acute older stroke inpatients undergoing rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 91: 211–219.
 
16. Koennecke HC, Belz W, Berfelde D, et al. Factors influencing in-hospital mortality and morbidity in patients treated on a stroke unit. Neurology. 2011; 77: 965–972.
 
17. Foer D, Ornstein K, Soriano TA, et al. Nonmedical factors associated with prolonged hospital length of stay in an urban homebound population. J Hosp Med. 2012; 7: 73–78.