Original Article

LGBTQ+ Health Inequities in a Rural, Conservative Context: Alabama Compared with Other Southern States

Authors: Sarah MacCarthy, ScD, Austin H. Johnson, PhD, J. Mac DeLay, , Mallie Froehlich, MSW, Chase Harless, DrPH, Marc N. Elliott, PhD

Abstract

Objectives: There are no statewide statistics regarding the health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) Alabamians. To fill this gap, we used data collected by the Southern Equality Research and Policy Center to compare Alabama with other southern US states regarding the health and well-being of LGBTQ+ people.

Methods: We tested for unadjusted differences between Alabama and other southern states using χ2 tests for dichotomous outcomes and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for ordinal outcomes. Multivariate logistic models predicted dichotomous outcomes from an Alabama indicator, a continuous rurality variable, and a racial and ethnic minority indicator to control for differences in rurality and racial and ethnic composition; multivariate linear regression was used to approximate the point estimate of adjusted differences.

Results: Alabama and other southern states had statistically similar and high levels of abuse, harassment, and poor mental and physical health. Alabamians lived in ZIP codes with somewhat higher rural–urban commuting area code rurality scores (AL 1.76; South 1.70; P = 0.036, where 1 is the most urban category). More than one-fourth of Alabama respondents reported experiencing self-harming behaviors; one-third reported suicidal ideation (33.1%); more than half reported anxiety disorders (57.6%); more than two-thirds reported being depressed (69.2%); and 25% to 75% experienced or feared emotional and physical abuse because of their identity. Multivariate adjusted results were generally similar to unadjusted results.

Conclusions: Alabama LGBTQ+ populations, who live in more rural settings than in most prior studies, experience markedly poor outcomes.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Cahill SR, Makadon HJ. If they don't count us, we don't count: Trump Administration rolls back sexual orientation and gender identity data collection. LGBT Health 2017;4:171–173.
 
2. Movement Advancement Project. Alabama's equality profile. https://www.lgbtmap.org/equality_maps/profile_state/AL. Accessed August 26, 2024.
 
3. Movement Advancement Project. Where we call home: LGBT people in rural America. https://www.lgbtmap.org/rural-lgbt. Published April 2019. Accessed August 26, 2024.
 
4. Farmer GW, Blosnich JR, Jabson JM, et al. Gay acres: sexual orientation differences in health indicators among rural and nonrural individuals. J Rural Health 2016;32:321–331.
 
5. UCLA School of Law, Williams Institute. LGBT data and demographics. https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/visualization/lgbt-stats/?topic=LGBT#about-the-data. Accessed August 26, 2024.
 
6. Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham. Living LGBTQ in central Alabama: priorities for action. https://www.cfbham.org/assets/2019/07/Living-LGBTQ-in-Central-Alabama.pdf. Published 2015. Accessed August 26, 2024.
 
7. Birmingham AIDS Outreach. Transgender and gender-diverse needs assessment: summary of findings. https://www.birminghamaidsoutreach.org/transneedsassessment. Published 2019. Accessed August 26, 2024.
 
8. Southwest Alabama Inclusion Project. Southwest Alabama LGBTQ+ community needs assessment. https://alabamainclusionproject.org/. Published 2023. Accessed August 26, 2024.
 
9. Harless C, Nanney M, Johson AH, et al. The Report of the 2019 Southern LGBTQ Health Survey: full report. https://southernequality.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/ SouthernLGBTQHealthSurvey%E2%80%93FullReport.pdf. Published 2019. Accessed August 26, 2024.
 
10. US Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. Rural-urban commuting area codes. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rural-urban-commuting-area-codes. Accessed August 26, 2024.
 
11. Orr N, Elliott MN, Burkhart Q, et al. Racial/ethnic differences in Medicare experiences and immunization: the role of disease burden. Med Care 2013;51:823–831.
 
12. US Census Bureau. Data from: United States Census: Decennial Census. 2020. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial-census/decade/2020/2020-tables.html. Accessed May 16, 2024.
 
13. World Population Review. Most rural states. https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/most-rural-states. Accessed September 18, 2024.
 
14. Podmore JA, Bain AL. “No queers out there”? Metronormativity and the queer suburban. Geography Compass 2019;14:1–16.
 
15. Kazyak E. Disrupting cultural selves: constructing gay and lesbian identities in rural locales. Qualit Sociol 2011;34:561–581.
 
16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Health Interview Survey (NHIS): codebook for sample adult file. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/2020nhis.htm. Accessed August 26, 2024.
 
17. National Institute of Mental Health. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity fisorder (ADHD). https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/attention-deficit-hyperactivity-disorder-adhd. Accessed August 26, 2024.
 
18. National Institute of Mental Health. Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/obsessive-compulsive-disorder-ocd. Accessed August 26, 2024.
 
19. Bowleg L. The problem with the phrase “women and minorities”: intersectionality—an important theoretical framework for public health. Am J Public Health 2012;102:1267–1273.
 
20. Currin JM, Giano Z, Hubach RD. Interface of internalized homophobia and community connectedness on frequency of doctor's visits for rural and urban MSM in Oklahoma. J Rural Health 2020;36:416–422.
 
21. Kaiser Family Foundation. Status of state Medicaid expansion decisions: interactive map. https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/status-of-state-medicaid-expansion-decisions-interactive-map/. Accessed August 26, 2024.
 
22. Perry I. South to America: a journey below the Mason-Dixon to understand the soul of a nation, 1st ed, New York: Harper Collins; 2022.
 
23. Swope CB,HernándezD. Housing asa determinant of health equity: a conceptual model. Soc Sci Med 2019;243:112571.
 
24. Romero T, Ponomariov B. The effect of Medicaid expansion on access to healthcare, health behaviors and health outcomes between expansion and non-expansion states. Eval Program Plann. 2023;99:102304.