Letter to the Editor

Lightning Injuries: In Reply

Authors: Jorge A. Martinez, MD, JD

Abstract

In Reply: My colleagues and I appreciate Dr. Soran's letter and his comments about our article. 1 We welcome the opportunity to address his suggestion that all lightning strike victims be admitted to the hospital. In doing so, we point out that few case series addressing lightning strikes have been published in the medical literature. Our research yielded three case series reports, which involved small numbers of patients accumulated over extended periods of time. Muehlberger et al 2 reviewed 12 patients during a 12-year period. Alar et al 3 discussed 22 patients treated during the course of 23 years. Gluncic et al 4 described 18 patients studied in a 15-year period who sustained ear injuries as a result of lightning strikes. Three other reports described multiple victims of a single lightning strike: 17 victims, 5 10 victims, 6 and 8 victims. 7 As Dr. Soran notes, Aslar et al 3 suggested that all lightning strike victims be admitted to the hospital. Interestingly, of the remaining five case series, only Epperly and Stewart 6 addressed admission criteria. In their article, they recommended that lightning strike victims be admitted to the hospital if they require resuscitation in the field or in the emergency department, if they are comatose, if they have symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischemia, if they develop paralysis, if they demonstrate electrocardiographic changes, if they have neurologic abnormalities, or if they demonstrate autonomic instability. Regarding delayed complications as a result of lightning strikes, Muehlberger et al 2 followed 10 of their 12 patients for an average period of 6.7 years (range, 1 mo–12.3 yr). They found that none of the 10 patients had any delayed or long-term complications. On the basis of their clinical findings and review of the literature, they concluded that the long-term outcome of lightning injuries was more favorable than generally reported. Thus, we remain of the opinion that victims of lightning strike should undergo a detailed history and physical examination with appropriate laboratory studies. Clearly, treatment should be instituted as needed. Patients with noncritical injuries should be observed in the emergency department for several hours. If, after several hours of observation, the patient remains asymptomatic and has normal laboratory studies, the patient may be discharged to home with appropriate follow-up.Jorge A. Martinez, MD, JD

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Whitcomb D, Martinez JA, Daberkow D. Lightning injuries. South Med J 2002; 95: 1331–1334.
 
2. Muehlberger T, Vogt PM, Munster AM. The long-term consequences of lightning injuries. Burns 2001; 27: 829–833.
 
3. Aslar AK, Soran A, Yildiz Y, et al. Epidemiology, morbidity, mortality and treatment of lightning injuries in a Turkish burns unit. Int J Clin Pract 2001; 55: 502–504.
 
4. Gluncic I, Roje Z, Gluncic V, et al. Ear injuries caused by lightning: Report of 18 cases. J Laryngol Otol 2001; 115: 4–8.
 
5. Fahmy FS, Brinsden MD, Smith J, et al. Lightning: The multisystem group injuries. J Trauma 1999; 46: 937–940.
 
6. Epperly TD, Stewart JR. The physical effects of lightning injury. J Fam Pract 1989; 29: 267–272.
 
7. Graber J, Ummenhofer W, Herion H. Lightning accident with eight victims: Case report and brief review of the literature. J Trauma 1996; 40: 288–290.