Original Article
Making Sense of State Health Data: The Case of Kentucky
Abstract
Objective: State health rankings present oversimplified and potentially damaging accounts of health status. Using the example of Kentucky, this article illustrates the realities masked by rankings that use averages and fail to account for social determinants of health.
Methods: Findings from a range of publicly available data are combined to shed light on factors that influence or are associated with health status indicators, including demographic data, health services utilization, health system elements, poverty, and educational attainment.
Results: Despite its low overall performance, Kentucky includes counties with health status that is equal to the highest-ranking states. Poverty and loss of healthy, working-age populations are closely associated with low health status, as are low rates of high school graduation.
Conclusions: Rankings that average health status indicators across widely diverse areas may yield findings that are only marginally relevant for health policy development. A high burden of morbidity pulls resources from population health to high-cost health services, challenging the viability of long-range initiatives; however, a comprehensive approach to health status improvement will be necessary to bring more southern US states like Kentucky into higher-ranking positions.
This content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($25)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.