Original Article
Matching Against Men: 5 Years of Residency Match Data Show Disparities Still Exist
Abstract
Objectives: Despite progress toward equal representation by sex in medical practice, women remain underrepresented in many specialties. This study sought to examine the current state of gender equality among recently graduated doctors in multiple specialties.Methods: Deidentified demographics, standardized examination scores, and Match results were gathered for 829 graduates. Participants were selected from an allopathic medical school between 2016 and 2020. Nineteen students (2.29%) were excluded from the study. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and χ2 tests for independence were used to compare proportions between reported sex and specialty and program Match results. One-way analysis of variance was then performed to test for differences in US Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and Step 2 scores between sexes. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: Of the 829 individuals studied, 44.6% were women. A significantly smaller proportion of women matched into the most competitive specialties, despite no significant difference in US Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 scores between sexes. Furthermore, there was an overall significant trend of women matching into more competitive programs for any given specialty.
Conclusions: In this study, we found that men matched into more highly competitive specialties, whereas women matched into more competitive residency program locations. Further research is needed to determine why women matched into specific specialties at lower rates than their male peers and seek to understand how sex affects the narrative of specialty choice.
This content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($25)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.
References
1. Boyle V, Shulruf B, and Poole P. Influence of gender and other factors on medical student specialty interest. N Z Med J 2014;127:78–87.
2. Ludmerer K. Seeking parity for women in academic medicine: a historical perspective. Acad Med 2020;95:1485–1487.
3. Martinez-Strengel A, Samuels EA, Cross J, et al. Trends in U.S. MD-PhD program matriculant diversity by sex and race/ethnicity. Acad Med 2022; 97:1346–1350.
4. Newman C, Templeton K, and Lo Chin, E. Inequity and women physicians: time to change millenia of societal beliefs. Permanente J 2020;24:20.024.
5. Riska E. Gender and medical careers. Maturitas 2011;8:264–267.
6. Asaad M, Zayegh O, Badawi J, et al. Gender differences in specialty preference among medical students at Aleppo University: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ 2020;20:184.
7. Madrigal J, Rudasill S, Tran Z, et al. Sexual and gender minority identity in undergraduate medical education: impact on experience and career trajectory. PLoS One 2021;16:e0260387.
8. Roberts L. Women and academic medicine. Acad Med 2020;95:1459–1464.
9. Greenup R, Pitt S. Women in academic surgery: a double-edged scalpel. Acad Med 2020;95:1483–1484.
10. Pelley E, Carnes M. When a specialty becomes “women’s work”: trends in and implications of specialty gender segregation in medicine. Acad Med 2020;95:1499–1506.
11. Valantine H. Where are we in bridging the gender leadership gap in academic medicine? Acad Med 2020;95:1475–1476.
12. Qureshi R, Lê J, Li T, et al. Gender and editorial authorship in high-impact epidemiology journals. Am J Epidemiol 2019;188:2140–2145.
13. Heisler CA, Mark K, Ton J, et al. Has a critical mass of women resulted in gender equity in gynecologic surgery? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020;223: 665–673.
14. Salinaro JR, Puechl AM, Havrilesky LJ, et al. Gender trends in gynecologic oncology authorship: implications for the critical evaluation of gender distribution in academic rank and leadership positions. Gynecol Oncol 2018;151:542–546.
15. Yang G, Villalta JD, Weiss DA, et al. Gender differences in academic productivity and academic career choice among urology residents. J Urol 2012;188:1286–1290.
16. Ross MB, Glennon BM, Murciano-Goroff R, et al. Women are credited less in science than are men. Nature 2022;608:135–145.
17. Burgess DJ, Joseph A, van Ryn M, et al. Does stereotype threat affect women in academic medicine? Acad Med 2012;87:506–512.
18. Haggins A. To be seen, heard, and valued: strategies to promote a sense of belonging for women and underrepresented in medicine physicians. Acad Med 2020;95:1507–1510.
19. McGregor AD. Gender and the surgical profession. N Z Med J 2019;32: 77–83.
20. Murphy B. These physician specialties have the biggest gender imbalances. https://www.ama-assn.org/medical-students/specialty-profiles/these-physician-specialties-have-biggest-gender-imbalances. Published January 9, 2023. Accessed May 29, 2022.
21. Stefani KM, Richards JR, Newman J, et al. Choosing primary care: factors influencing graduating osteopathic medical students. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2020;120:380–387.
22. Association of American Medical Colleges. Historical percentile ranks for the MCAT exam. https://students-residents.aamc.org/mcat-research-and-data/historical-percentile-ranks-mcat-exam. Published 2022. Accessed May 29, 2022.
23. Bernstein J. Male practice: gender inequality in orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471:1754–1757.
24. Siotos C, Payne RM, Stone JP, et al. Evolution of workforce diversity in surgery. J Surg Educ 2019;76:1015–1021.
25. Day MA, Owens JM, Caldwell LS. Breaking barriers: a brief overview of diversity in orthopedic surgery. Iowa Orthop J 2019;39:1–5.
26. Miller VM, Padilla LA, Swicord WB, et al. Gender differences in cardiothoracic surgery interest among general surgery applicants. Ann Thorac Surg 2021;112: 961–967.
27. Moon MR. Equal means equal: cardiothoracic surgery in its second century. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021;161:1381–1389.
28. Bowe SN, Wang X, Whipple ME, et al. Evidence of specialty-specific gender disparities in resident recruitment and selection. J Grad Med Educ 2021;13:841–847.
29. Association of American Medical Colleges. Physical specialty data report: active physicians by sex and specialty, 2019. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/data/active-physicians-sex-and-specialty-2019. Published 2019. Accessed May 29, 2022.
30. Chervenak FA, Asfaw TS, Shaktman BD, et al. Gender diversity in residency training: the case for affirmative inclusion. J Grad Med Educ 2017;9: 685–687.
31. Association of American Medical Colleges. Physician Specialty Data Report: 2020 Physician Specialty Data Report executive summary. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/data/2020-physician-specialty-data-report-executive-summary. Published 2020. Accessed May 29, 2022.
32. American College of Surgeons. What are the surgical specialties? https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/education/online-guide-to-choosing-a-surgical-residency/guide-to-choosing-a-surgical-residency-for-medical-students/faqs/specialties/. Published 2022. Accessed May 29, 2022.
33. Association of American Medical Colleges. 2019 State Physician Workforce Data Report. https://store.aamc.org/2019-state-physician-workforce-data-report.html. Published 2019. Accessed June 15, 2022.
34. Doximity. Doximity Residency Navigator. https://www.doximity.com/residency. Published 2022. Accessed April 7, 2022.
35. Ahmed H, Carmody JB. On the looming physician shortage and strategic expansion of graduate medical education. Cureus 2020;12:e9216.
36. Cuddy MM, Swanson DB, Clauser BE. A multilevel analysis of examinee gender and USMLE Step 1 performance. Acad Med 2018;83(10 Suppl): S58–S62.
37. Kroin E, Garbarski D, Shimomura A, et al. Gender differences in program factors important to applicants when evaluating orthopaedic surgery residency programs. J Grad Med Educ 2019;11:565–569.
38. Gibney R, Cantwell C, Wray A, et al. Influence of factors relating to sex and gender on rank list decisions and perceptions of residency training: survey study. JMIR Med Educ 2022;8:e33592.
