Original Article

Do Mixed-Flora Preoperative Urine Cultures Matter?

Authors: Michael R. Polin, MD, Amie Kawasaki, MD, Cindy L. Amundsen, MD, Alison C. Weidner, MD, Nazema Y. Siddiqui, MD, MHS

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether mixed-flora preoperative urine cultures, as compared with no-growth preoperative urine cultures, are associated with a higher prevalence of postoperative urinary tract infections (UTIs).

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. Women who underwent urogynecologic surgery were included if their preoperative clean-catch urine culture result was mixed flora or no growth. Women were excluded if they received postoperative antibiotics for reasons other than treatment of a UTI. Women were divided into two cohorts based on preoperative urine culture results—mixed flora or no growth; the prevalence of postoperative UTI was compared between cohorts. Baseline characteristics were compared using χ2 or Student t tests. A logistic regression analysis then was performed.

Results: We included 282 women who were predominantly postmenopausal, white, and overweight. There were many concomitant procedures; 46% underwent a midurethral sling procedure and 68% underwent pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Preoperative urine cultures resulted as mixed flora in 192 (68%) and no growth in 90 (32%) patients. Overall, 14% were treated for a UTI postoperatively. There was no difference in the proportion of patients treated for a postoperative UTI between the two cohorts (25 mixed flora vs 13 no growth, P = 0.77). These results remained when controlling for potentially confounding variables in a logistic regression model (adjusted odds ratio 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.43–1.96).

Conclusions: In women with mixed-flora compared with no-growth preoperative urine cultures, there were no differences in the prevalence of postoperative UTI. The clinical practice of interpreting mixed-flora cultures as negative is appropriate.

 

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Chung CP, Kuehl TJ, Harris SK, et al. Incidence and risk factors of postoperative urinary tract infection after uterosacral ligament suspension. Int Urogynecol J 2012;23:947-950.
 
2. Sutkin G, Alperin M, Meyn L, et al. Symptomatic urinary tract infections after surgery for prolapse and/or incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 2010;21:955-961.
 
3. Wei JT, Nygaard I, Richter HE, et al. A midurethral sling to reduce incontinence after vaginal prolapse repair. N Engl J Med 2012;366:2358-2367.
 
4. Nygaard I, Brubaker L, Chai TC, et al. Risk factors for urinary tract infection following incontinence surgery. Int Urogynecol J 2011;22:1255-1265.
 
5. Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 2008;300:1311-1316.
 
6. Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, et al. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:1201-1206.
 
7. Fok CS, Mckinley K, Mueller ER, et al. Day of surgery urine cultures identify urogynecologic patients at increased risk for postoperative urinary tract infection. J Urol 2013;189:1721-1724.
 
8. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology. ACOG practice bulletin no. 104: antibiotic prophylaxis for gynecologic procedures. Obstet Gynecol 2009;113:1180-1189.
 
9. Bartlett RC, Treiber N. Clinical significance of mixed bacterial cultures of urine. Am J Clin Pathol 1984;82:319-322.
 
10. Siegman-Igra Y, Kulka T, Schwartz D, et al. Polymicrobial and monomicrobial bacteraemic urinary tract infection. J Hosp Infect 1994;28:49-56.
 
11. Siegman-Igra Y. The significance of urine culture with mixed flora. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 1994;3:656-659.
 
12. Baerheim A, Digranes A, Hunskaar S. Evaluation of urine sampling technique: bacterial contamination of samples from women students. Br J Gen Pract 1992;42:241-243.
 
13. Jackson SR, Dryden M, Gillett P, et al. A novel midstream urine-collection device reduces contamination rates in urine cultures amongst women. BJU Int 2005;96:360-364.
 
14. Valenstein P, Meier F. Urine culture contamination: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of contaminated urine cultures in 906 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1998;122:123-129.
 
15. Polin MR, Edenfield AL, Dieter AA, et al. Predictors of positive preoperative urine cultures in asymptomatic women undergoing urogynecologic surgery. Clinical Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine. https://oatext.com/Predictors-of-positive-preoperative-urine-cultures-in-asymptomatic-women-undergoing-urogynecologic-surgery.php. Accessed March 19, 2017.
 
16. Hilt EE, Mckinley K, Pearce MM, et al. Urine is not sterile: use of enhanced urine culture techniques to detect resident bacterial flora in the adult female bladder. J Clin Microbiol 2014;52:871-876.
 
17. Price T, Hilt E, Dune T, et al. Detecting clinically relevant microorganisms: we can do better. Neurourol Urodyn 2016;35:S22.
 
18. Brubaker L, Wolfe AJ. The new world of the urinary microbiota in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;213:644-649.