Original Article

No Difference in Emergency Department Length of Stay for Patients with Limited Proficiency in English

Authors: Joshua Wallbrecht, MD, Linda Hodes-Villamar, MD, Steven J. Weiss, MD, Amy A. Ernst, MD

Abstract

Objectives

The population of the United States continues to diversify, with an increasing percentage of individuals who have limited English proficiency (LEP). A major concern facing emergency departments (EDs) around the country is increasing length of stay (LOS). Although multiple studies have shown racial and ethnic disparities in waiting time and LOS, no studies have examined specifically whether patients with LEP have a different LOS than English-speaking (ES) patients. In addition, no studies have examined whether the use of interpreters by patients with LEP has a significant impact on LOS. We hypothesized that there was a significant difference in LOS when comparing patients with LEP and ES patients and patients with LEP who used interpreters versus patients with LEP who did not.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study with LOS data collected from a level I ED patient tracking software program from October 2011 to December 2011. The primary language preferred by the patient was indicated at the time of triage and registration and the patient’s use of an interpreter also was recorded. The patient’s demographic data, ED visit information, and LOS were prospectively entered into an Excel spreadsheet. Percentages were compared using 95% confidence intervals and LOS was analyzed using the Student t test. With >100 subjects per group, our study had 80% power (ie, a power of 0.8) to determine a 15% difference in proportions between groups or a difference of 120 minutes (assuming a standard deviation of 300 minutes on both means).

Results

Data were collected from a total of 121 ES patients and 124 patients with LEP. In the LEP group were the languages of Spanish, Navajo, Vietnamese, Chinese, Arabic, and American Sign Language. Fifty-eight percent of patients with LEP used an interpreter. There were no differences between ES patients and patients with LEP in age, sex, mode of arrival, chief complaints, acuity, percentage admitted, percentage pediatric patients, or percentage of Medicaid/Medicare recipients. More patients with LEP were self-pay (36% vs 20%, diff 16, 95% confidence interval 2–31). There were no differences in mean LOS from time of arrival to time to being seen by a provider when comparing ES patients with patients with LEP or time of arrival to time to discharge or admission request. Comparing the patients with LEP who used interpreters with those who did not use interpreters, there was a significantly different LOS from time of arrival to time of discharge or admission request (958 ± 644 vs 628 ± 595 minutes, diff 330, 95% confidence interval 84–576).

Conclusions

There was no difference in LOS for patients with LEP; however, patients with LEP who used interpreters had a significant increase in LOS compared with those who did not use interpreters.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Ramirez D, Engel KG, Tang TS. Language interpreter utilization in the emergency department setting: a clinical review. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2008; 19: 352–362.
 
2. Blanchard JC, Haywood YC, Scott C. Racial and ethnic disparities in health: an emergency medicine perspective. Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 10: 1289–1293.
 
3. Goldman RD, Amin P, Macpherson A. Language and length of stay in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006; 22: 640–643.
 
4. Heron SL, Stettner E, Haley LL Jr. Racial and ethnic disparities in the emergency department: a public health perspective. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2006; 24: 905–923.
 
5. Karliner LS, Jacobs EA, Chen AH, et al. Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for patients with limited English proficiency? A systematic review of the literature. Health Serv Res. 2007; 42: 727–754.
 
6. Levine DA, Neidecker MV, Kiefe CI, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in access to physician care and medications among US stroke survivors. Neurology. 2011; 76: 53–61.
 
7. Karve SJ, Balkrishnan R, Mohammad YM, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in emergency department waiting time for stroke patients in the United States. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011; 20: 30–40.
 
8. Neureuther SJ, Nagpal K, Greenbaum A, et al. The effect of insurance status on outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27: 1761–1765.
 
9. Takakuwa KM, Shofer FS, Limkakeng AT Jr, et al. Preferences for cardiac tests and procedures may partially explain sex but not race disparities. Am J Emerg Med. 2008; 26: 545–550.
 
10. Takakuwa KM, Shofer FS, Hollander JE. The influence of race and gender on time to initial electrocardiogram for patients with chest pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13: 867–872.
 
11. Tsai CL, Camargo CA Jr. Racial and ethnic differences in emergency care for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Acad Emerg Med. 2009; 16: 108–115.
 
12. Wu BU, Banks PA, Conwell DL. Disparities in emergency department wait times for acute gastrointestinal illnesses: results from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1997–2006. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009; 104: 1668–1673.
 
13. Herring A, Wilper A, Himmelstein DU, et al. Increasing length of stay among adult visits to U.S. emergency departments, 2001–2005. Acad Emerg Med. 2009; 16: 609–616.
 
14. Pines JM, Russell Localio A, Hollander JE. Racial disparities in emergency department length of stay for admitted patients in the United States. Acad Emerg Med. 2009; 16: 403–410.
 
15. Shi L, Stevens GD. Disparities in access to care and satisfaction among U.S. children: the roles of race/ethnicity and poverty status. Public Health Rep. 2005; 120: 431–441.
 
16. Bailey SC, Pandit AU, Curtis L, et al. Availability of Spanish prescription labels: a multi-state pharmacy survey. Med Care. 2009; 47: 707–710.
 
17. Waxman MA, Levitt MA. Are diagnostic testing and admission rates higher in non-English-speaking versus English-speaking patients in the emergency department? Ann Emerg Med. 2000; 36: 456–461.
 
18. Divi C, Koss RG, Schmaltz SP, et al. Language proficiency and adverse events in US hospitals: a pilot study. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19: 60–67.
 
19. Fiscella K, Franks P, Doescher MP, et al. Disparities in health care by race, ethnicity, and language among the insured: findings from a national sample. Med Care. 2002; 40: 52–59.
 
20. Hampers LC, McNulty JE. Professional interpreters and bilingual physicians in a pediatric emergency department: effect on resource utilization. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002; 156: 1108–1113.