Original Article
Open Access: Inconsistencies in Colonic Tattooing Practice: Differences in Reported and Actual Practices at a Tertiary Medical Center
Abstract
Objectives: Accurate localization of a colonic lesion is crucial to successful resection. Although colonic tattooing is a widely accepted technique to mark lesions for future identification surgery or repeat colonoscopy, no consensus guidelines exist. The objective of this study was to determine whether the current tattooing practice at a tertiary medical center differs from recommendations in the literature and self-reported provider practice.Methods: The study consisted of an observational retrospective chart review of patients who received colonic tattoos, as well as a provider survey of reported tattooing practices at a tertiary academic medical center. A total of 747 patients older than 18 years of age who underwent colonoscopy with tattoo were included. Forty-four gastroenterologists performing endoscopy were surveyed on tattooing techniques.
Results: In the majority of cases, neither the number of tattoos, location of the tattoo nor the distance from the lesion was specified within the report. Following the index procedure, a tattoo was detected in 75% of surgical resections and 73% of endoscopies. At the time of surgery, however, the tattoo and/or the lesion was detected approximately 94% of the time. Twenty-five endoscopists (56.8%) completed the survey. Differences were seen the between the chart review and reported practice. Most providers report placing ≥2 marks (87.2%); however, chart review revealed that only 56.2 % were tattooed with ≥2 marks.
Conclusions: Variation exists between the reported tattooing practice and actual practice. Despite this, most tattoos are identified at the time of surgery or repeat endoscopy. Further research is needed to determine whether a standardized approach to tattooing and reporting could improve localization at repeat endoscopy.
Posted in: Gastroenterology53 Colonic And Anorectal Disease8
Full Article
Having trouble viewing the article content below? Click here to open it directly.
Images
References
1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:7-30.
2. Nishihara R, Wu K, Lochhead P, et al. Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1095-1105.
3. Baxter NN, Warren JL, Barrett MJ, et al. Association between colonoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality in a US cohort according to site of cancer and colonoscopist specialty. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:2664-2669.
4. Sauntry JP, Knudtson KP. A technique for marking the mucosa of the gastrointestinal tract after polypectomy. Cancer 1958;11:607-610.
5. ASGE Technology Committee., Kethu SR, Banerjee S, et al. Endoscopic tattooing. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;72:681-685.
6. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377-381.
7. Nizam R, Siddiqi N, Landas SK, et al. Colonic tattooing with India ink: benefits, risks, and alternatives. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:1804-1808.
8. Rex DK. The appropriate use and techniques of tattooing in the colon. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 2018;14:314-317.
9. Saleh A, Ihedioha U, Babu B, et al. Audit of preoperative localisation of tumor with tattoo for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Scott Med J 2016;61:160-162.
10. Azin A, Jimenez MC, Cleghorn MC, et al. Discrepancy between gastroenterologists' and general surgeons' perspectives on repeat endoscopy in colorectal cancer. Can J Surg 2016;59:29-34.
