Original Article

Patient Gender Affects Skin Cancer Screening Practices and Attitudes Among Veterans

Authors: Daniel G. Federman, MD, Jeffrey D. Kravetz, MD, Fancgchao Ma, MD, PhD, Robert S. Kirsner, MD, PhD

Abstract

Background: Skin cancer screening (SCS) with a full body skin examination (FBSE) has the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality. Little is known about gender differences with respect to SCS practices and attitudes between men and women.


Methods: Data from two previously published studies based on questionnaires administered to veterans were combined and analyzed according to patient gender. The participants consisted of a convenience sample of 437 patients awaiting primary care, women’s health, or dermatology clinic appointments at the West Haven Veterans Affairs Medical Center.


Results: Male veterans were more likely to report undergoing FBSE than female veterans (32 versus 18%), but less likely to perform self-examination (42 versus 48%). Female veterans were more likely to report embarrassment than men, but both genders expressed that providers who perform SCS are thorough. Gender discordance between patient and examining physician is more likely to lead to refusal for women than men (16 versus 2%).


Conclusion: We found low rates of SCS in both male and female veterans in different clinic settings at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Female veterans are less likely to report undergoing FBSE and more likely than male veterans to perform self-examination for skin cancer, to report embarrassment with FBSE, and refuse FBSE if the examining physician is of the opposite gender.


Key Points


* Both male and female veterans report a low rate of skin cancer screening.


* Female veterans were less likely to report undergoing full body skin examinations than male veterans.


* Female veterans were more likely than male veterans to report embarrassment with full body skin examinations.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Jemal A, Siegal R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57:43–66.
 
2. Rhodes AR, Weisnstock MA, Fitzpatrick TB, et al. Risk factors for cutaneous melanoma. A practical method of recognizing predisposed individuals. JAMA 1987;258:3146–3154.
 
3. Kirsner RS, Federman DG. The rationale for skin cancer screening and prevention. Am J Manag Care 1998;4:1279–1284.
 
4. Balch CM, Soong SJ, Shaw HM, et al. An analysis of prognostic factors in 8500 patients with cutaneous melanoma, in Balch CM, Houghton AN, Milton GW, et al (eds): Cutaneous Melanoma. Philadelphia, JB Lippincott Company, 1992, p 165.
 
5. Kopf AW. Prevention and early detection of skin cancer/melanoma. Cancer 1988;62(supple 8):1791–1795.
 
6. Fletcher SW. The periodic health examination and internal medicine: 1984. Ann Intern Med 1984;101:866–868.
 
7. Nelson C, Woodwell D. National ambulatory medical care survey: 1993 summary. Vital Health Stat 13 1998;136:iii–vi, 1–99.
 
8. Federman DG, Kravetz JD, Tobin DG, et al. Full body skin examinations. The patient’s perspective. Arch Dermatol 2004;140:530–534.
 
9. Federman DG, Kravetz JD, Haskell SG, et al. Full-body skin examinations and the female veteran. Prevalence and perspective. Arch Dermatol 2006;142:312–316.
 
10. Kirsner RS, Mukherjee S, Federman DG. Skin cancer screening in primary care: prevalence and barriers. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999;41:564–566.
 
11. Federman DG, Kravetz JD, Kirsner RS. Skin cancer screening by dermatologists: prevalence and barriers. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002;46:710–714.
 
12. Federman DG, Concato J, Caralis PV, et al. Screening for skin cancer in primary care settings. Arch Dermatol 1997;133:1423–1425.
 
13. Saraiya M, Hall HI, Thompson T, et al. Skin cancer screening among U.S. adults from 1992, 1998, and 2000 National Health Interview surveys. Prev Med 2004;39:308–314.
 
14. Miller DR, Geller AC, Wyatt SW, et al. Melanoma awareness and self-examination practices: results of a United States survey. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996;34:962–970.
 
15. Anderson PJ, Lowe JB, Stanton WR, et al. Skin cancer prevention: a link between primary prevention and early detection? Aust J Public Health 1994;18:417–420.
 
16. Girgis A, Campbell EM, Redman S, et al. Screening for melanoma: a community survey of prevalence and predictors. Med J Aust 1991;154:338–343.
 
17. Berwick M, Begg CB, Fine JA, et al. Screening for cutaneous melanoma by skin self-examination. J National Cancer Inst 1996;88:17–23.
 
18. Fang MC, McCarthy EP, Singer DE. Are patients more likely to see physicians of the same sex? Recent trends in primary care medicine. Am J Med 2004;117:575–581.
 
19. Rifkin JI, Shapiro H, Regensteiner JG, et al. Why do some women refuse to allow male residents to perform pelvic exams. Acad Med 2002;77:1034–1038.
 
20. Lurie N, Slater J, McGovern P, et al. Preventive care for women-does the sex of the physician matter? N Engl J Med 1993;329:478–482.
 
21. Coyle BS, Wolan DL, Van Horn AS. The prevalence of physical and sexual abuse in women veterans seeking care at a Veterans Affairs medical Center. Mil Med 1996;161:588–593.