Original Article

PEARLS for an Ultrasound Physical and Its Routine Use as Part of the Clinical Examination

Authors: Michael Wagner, MD, Janice Boughton, MD

Abstract

At present, there is no consensus on what a routine examination that uses ultrasound (US) should look like. Point-of-care US (POCUS) is poised to be as important a clinical skill as palpation and auscultation; however, the expansive list of potential applications can be intimidating to the beginner. In this article we propose using a PEARLS (Parasternal, Epigastric, Anterior Lung [and/or Apical], Right upper quadrant, Left upper quadrant, and Suprapubic) mnemonic as an approach to a core physical examination augmented with POCUS for routine use. Numerous US protocols for trauma, shock, and respiratory failure have been published, and it is no coincidence that many have evolved overlapping views. These views have numerous uses and applications and should not be confined to only critically ill patients. The PEARLS examination is for both primary care and inpatient settings and is scalable for POCUS beginners and advanced users. From the generalist’s perspective, we describe our philosophy on the initial foundation and provide a framework to grow one’s POCUS skills.

 

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Narula J, Chandrashekhar Y, Braunwald E. Time to add a fifth pillar to bedside physical examination inspection, palpation, percussion, auscultation, and insonation. JAMA Cardiol 2018;3:346-350.
 
2. Kristensen JK, Buemann B, Kü E. Ultrasonic scanning in the diagnosis of splenic haematomas. Acta Chir Scand 1971;137:653-657.
 
3. Hauenstein KH, Wimmer B, Billmann P, et al. [Sonography of blunt abdominal trauma (author’ translation)]. Radiologe 1982;22:106-111. [Article in German].
4. Mayron R, Gaudio FE, Plummer D, et al. Echocardiography performed by emergency physicians: impact on diagnosis and therapy. Ann Emerg Med 1988;17:150-154.
 
5. Tso P, Rodriquez A, Cooper C, et al. Sonography in blunt abdominal trauma: a preliminary progress report. J Trauma 1992;33:39-4.
 
6. Rozycki GS, Ochsner MG, Jaffin JH, et al. Prospective evaluation of surgeons’ use of ultrasound in the evaluation of trauma patients. J Trauma 1993;34:516-527.
 
7. Scalea TM, Rodriguez A, Chiu WC, et al. Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST): results from an international consensus conference. J Trauma 1999;46:466-472.
 
8. Kirkpatrick AW, Sirois M, Laupland KB, et al. Hand-held thoracic sonography for detecting post-traumatic pneumothoraces: the Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (EFAST). J Trauma 2004;57:288-295.
 
9. Brooks A, Davies B, Smethhurst M, et al. Emergency ultrasound in the acute assessment of haemothorax. Emerg Med J 2004;21:44-46.
 
10. Lichtenstein DA. L’Échographie Générale en Réanimation (General Ultrasound in Intensive Care). Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1992.
 
11. Jones AE, Tayal VS, Sullivan DM, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of immediate versus delayed goal-directed ultrasound to identify the cause of nontraumatic hypotension in emergency department patients. Crit Care Med 2004;32:1703-1708.
 
12. Kimura BJ, Shaw DJ, Agan DL, et al. Value of a cardiovascular limited ultrasound examination using a hand-carried ultrasound device on clinical management in an outpatient medical clinic. Am J Cardiol 2007;100:321-325.
 
13. Kimura BJ, Yogo N, O'Connell CW, et al. Cardiopulmonary limited ultrasound examination for “quick-look” bedside application. Am J Cardiol 2011;108:586-590.
 
14. Lichtenstein DA, Mezierè GA. Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure: the BLUE protocol. Chest 2008;,134:117-125.
 
15. Weingart SD, Duque D, Nelson B. Rapid ultrasound for shock and hypotension. http://emcrit.org/RUSH-exam/original-RUSH-article. Published May 2009. Accessed July 1, 2017.
 
16. Perera P, Mailhot T, Riley D, et al. The RUSH exam: Rapid Ultrasound in SHock in the evaluation of the critically ill. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2010;28:29-56.
 
17. Volpicelli G, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M, et al. International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive Care Med 2012;38:577-591.
 
18. Atkinson P, Bowra J, Milne J, et al. International Federation for Emergency Medicine Consensus Statement: sonography in hypotension and cardiac arrest (SHoC): an international consensus on the use of point of care ultrasound for undifferentiated hypotension and during cardiac arrest. CJEM 2017;19:459-470.
 
19. Liu RB, Donroe JH, McNamara RL, et al. The practice and implications of finding fluid during point-of-care ultrasonography: a review. JAMA Intern Med 2017;177:1818-1825.
 
20. Cessford T, Meneilly GS, Arishenkoff S, et al. Comparing physical examination with sonographic versions of the same examination techniques for splenomegaly. J Ultrasound Med 2017; Dec 8. [Epub ahead of print].