Spirituality/Medicine Interface Project
Perfecting Ourselves: On Christian Tradition and Enhancement
Abstract
Behind most ethical reflections on enhancement remains a residual suspicion of the human tendency to pursue perfection. The problem lies, however, not with the question of whether we should pursue perfection, but rather what perfection we are pursuing. Here, I argue that perfection, properly understood, has a positive function in the Christian ascetical tradition. Specifically, I examine briefly three sources: the Scriptures, the scholastic tradition, and ascetical theology. Then I show how a positive, responsible view of perfection is an asset to our discussion on enhancement technology.This content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($25)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.
References
1. Juengst ET. Can enhancement be distinguished from prevention in genetic medicine? J Med Philos 1997;22:127–142.
2. Silvers A. A fatal attraction to normalizing. Enhancing Human Traits. Parens, E (ed) Washington, DC, Georgetown University Press, 1999, pp 95–123.
3. Parens E. Is better always good? Hastings Center Report 1998;S4.
4. Torres JM. On the limits of enhancement in human gene transfer: drawing the line. J Med Philos 1997;22:43–53.
5. McKenny G. To Relieve the Human Condition. Albany, State University of New York, 1997.
