Original Article

Physical Activity Trends in South Carolina, 1994–2000

Authors: Katrina D. DuBose, PHD, Karen A. Kirtland, PHD, Steven P. Hooker, PHD, Regina M. Fields, MS

Abstract

Objectives: During the 1990s, physical activity recommendations and surveillance methods were developed in an attempt to increase and monitor, respectively, regular physical activity prevalence rates. For this article, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data were analyzed to determine whether regular physical activity proportions in South Carolina adults changed from 1994 to 2000. The physical activity prevalence rates for South Carolina were compared with national rates and Healthy People 2000 goals to measure progress. The rate of physical activity counseling by physicians and other health professionals was also analyzed from 1998 to 1999.


Methods: Total subjects included 10,495 adults ages 18 years and older from South Carolina and 545,445 from the remainder of the United States. Using random-digit dialing procedures in 1994, 1996, 1998 and 2000, the two most frequent types of leisure-time physical activity performed in the past month were identified. For activities listed, the frequency (days/wk) and duration (minutes/d) were obtained. Linear regressions were performed on regular physical activity and inactivity for the total population and by gender, race, age, and body mass index (BMI). Data pertaining to whether or not a physician or other health professional had provided physical activity counseling were also obtained for 1998 and 1999.


Results: From 1994 to 2000, the proportion of South Carolina adults participating in regular leisure time physical activity significantly increased (10.8%). Interestingly, the prevalence of regular physical activity in the rest of the nation remained unchanged during this time. Although significant increases were observed in nearly all subgroups, physical activity prevalence rates for South Carolina adults lagged behind national levels and did not meetHealthy People 2000 goals. Physical activity counseling by physicians and other health professionals increased from 1998 (24.1%) to 1999 (30.4%).


Conclusions: While it is not known what factors influenced regular physical activity from 1994 to 2000, they seem to have been equally effective in South Carolina adults of both genders, both races, regular and overweight status, and nearly all age groups. Despite these positive trends, additional efforts are needed to develop and implement effective community and primary care physical activity interventions that facilitate improvements among the nearly two-thirds of South Carolina adults who do not participate in sufficient physical activity to reap significant health benefits.


Key Points


* A significant increase in the prevalence of regular physical activity among South Carolina adults was observed from 1994 to 2000. The increase was observed in adults of both genders, white and black race, healthy weight and overweight status, and varying age groups.


* The proportion of physicians and other health professionals providing physical activity counseling increased from 1998 to 1999.


* Despite positive trends in regular physical activity and physician counseling, nearly two-thirds of South Carolina adults do not participate in sufficient physical activity to gain significant health benefits.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 1996.
 
2. Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, et al. Physical activity and public health: a recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA1995;273:402–407.
 
3. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2000: National health promotion and disease prevention objectives. Washington D.C., Public Health Services, 1991.
 
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Physical activity trends – United States, 1990–1998.MMWR 2001;50:166–169.
 
5. Ainsworth BE, Ransdell LB, Whitt MC, et al. Promoting physical activity among irregularly active South Carolinians: BRFSS 1994–1996. J S C Med Assoc 1999;95:257–261.
 
6. LaMonte MJ, Nahas MV, Neff LJ, et al. Trends in physical activity levels among black and white adults in South Carolina. J S C Med Assoc 2000;96:416–420.
 
7. Granner ML, Ligouri G, Kirkner GJ, et al. Health care provider counseling for physical activity among black and white South Carolinians. J S C Med Assoc 2001;97:338–341.
 
8. The Writing Group for the Activity Counseling Trial Research Group. Effects of physical activity counseling in primary care settings. JAMA 2001;286:677–687.
 
9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of health-care providers asking older adults about their physical activity levels – United States, 1998. MMWR 2002;51:412–414.