Original Article

Pregnant Adolescents' Preferences for Labor Pain Management

Authors: Andrea R. Thurman, MD, Thomas C. Hulsey, SCD

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the obstetric anesthesia method used, based on the patient’s age. Confounding variables analyzed were the effect on labor pain management choices of parity, race, prenatal care participation, insurance status, and length of labor.


Methods: This was a case control study from the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC). The primary outcome measured was regional anesthesia (RA) use in labor. The exposure groups were based on the patient’s age. All women aged 11 years and older who delivered vaginally from 1996 to 2001 were included; 7,583 patients met inclusion criteria. Results were analyzed using χ2 statistic, univariate analysis, ANOVA, and logistic regression.


Results: We found that primiparous adolescents used RA less than primiparous women over age 20. This association is not found in multiparous teens. Patients with shorter labors, black women, those without prenatal care, and older patients lacking private insurance declined RA more often.


Conclusions: RA is the most utilized form of obstetric pain management in the last decade. In primiparous adolescents, declining RA cannot be explained by length of labor, race, insurance status, or prenatal care participation.


Key Points


* Primiparous adolescents choose regional anesthesia significantly less often than older primiparous patients.


* Patients with shorter labors, black women, older patients without private health insurance, and patients with no prenatal care also utilize regional anesthesia signficantly less often.


* Understanding adolescents’ choices in labor will optimize their contact with the health care system.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Ventura SJ, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD. Revised Birth and Fertility Rates for the United States, 2000 and 2001. Nat Vital Stat Report 2003;51:1–19.
 
2. Kmietowicz Z. US and UK are top in teenage pregnancy rates. BMJ 2002;324:1354.
 
3. Marmor TR, Krol DM. Labor pain management in the United States: Understanding patterns and the issue of choice. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S173–S180.
 
4. Polaneczky M, O’Connor K. Pregnancy in the Adolescent Patient: Screening, Diagnosis, and Initial Management. Pediatr Clin North Am 1999;46:649–670.
 
5. Phipps MG, Sowers M. Defining early adolescent childbearing. Am J Public Health 2002;92:125–128.
 
6. Satin AJ, Leveno KJ, Sherman L, et al. Maternal youth and pregnancy outcomes: middle school versus high school age groups compared with women beyond the teen years. Am J Obstet Gynecol1994;171:184–187.
 
7. Obst TE, Nauenberg E, Buck GM. Maternal health insurance coverage as a determinanat of obstetrical anesthesia care. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2000;12:177–191.
 
8. Hueston WJ, Applegate JA, Mansfield CJ, et al. Practice variations between family physicians and obstetricians in the management of low-risk pregnancies. J Fam Pract 1995;40:345–351.