Original Article

Project BOOST Implementation: Lessons Learned

Authors: Mark V. Williams, MD, Jing Li, MD, MS, Luke O. Hansen, MD, MHS, Victoria Forth, MA, Tina Budnitz, MPH, Jeffrey L. Greenwald, MD, Eric Howell MD, Lakshmi Halasyamani, MD, Arpana Vidyarthi, MD, Eric A. Coleman, MD, MPH

Abstract

Objectives: Enhancing care coordination and reducing hospital readmissions have been a focus of multiple quality improvement (QI) initiatives. Project BOOST (Better Outcomes by Optimizing Safe Transitions) aims to enhance the discharge transition from hospital to home. Previous research indicates that QI initiatives originating externally often face difficulties gaining momentum or effecting lasting change in a hospital. We performed a qualitative evaluation of Project BOOST implementation by examining the successes and failures experienced by six pilot sites. We also evaluated the unique physician mentoring component of this program. Finally, we examined the impact of intensification of the physician mentoring model on adoption of BOOST interventions in two later Illinois cohorts (27 hospitals).

Methods: Qualitative analysis of six pilot hospitals used a process of methodological triangulation and analysis of the BOOST enrollment applications, the listserv, and content from telephone interviews. Evaluation of BOOST implementation at Illinois hospitals occurred via mid-year and year-end surveys.

Results: The identified common barriers included inadequate understanding of the current discharge process, insufficient administrative support, lack of protected time or dedicated resources, and lack of frontline staff buy-in. Facilitators of implementation included the mentor, a small beginning, teamwork, and proactive engagement of the patient. Notably, hospitals viewed their mentors as essential facilitators of change. Sites consistently commented that the individualized mentoring was extremely helpful and provided significant accountability and stimulated creativity. In the Illinois cohorts, the improved mentoring model showed more complete implementation of BOOST interventions.

Conclusions: The implementation of Project BOOST was well received by hospitals, although sites faced substantial barriers consistent with other QI research reports. The unique mentorship element of Project BOOST proved extremely valuable in helping sites overcome their distinctive challenges and identify facilitators for success. The findings from this qualitative study should contribute to future BOOST implementation success and others’ efforts to optimize hospital discharge transitions.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Forster AJ, Clark HD, Menard A, et al. Adverse events among medical patients after discharge from hospital. CMAJ 2004;170:345-349.
 
2. Forster AJ, Murff HJ, Peterson JF, Gandhi TK, et al. The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:161-167.
 
3. Moore C, McGinn T, Halm E. Tying up loose ends: discharging patients with unresolved medical issues. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1305-1311.
 
4. Roy CL, Poon EG, Karson AS, et al. Patient safety concerns arising from test results that return after hospital discharge. Ann Intern Med 2005;143:121-128.
 
5. Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA. Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1418-1428.
 
5a. Rabin R. Health care’s ‘‘dirty little secret’’: no one may be coordinating care. http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/Stories/2013/April/30/Coordination-of-care.aspx. Published 2013. Accessed June 20, 2014.
 
6. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Hospital readmissions reduction program. http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/AcuteInpatientPPS/Readmissions-Reduction-Program.html. Accessed August 4, 2013.
 
7. Hansen LO, Greenwald JL, Budnitz T, et al. Project BOOST: effectiveness of a multihospital effort to reduce rehospitalization. J Hosp Med 2013;8:421-427.
 
8. Society of Hosptial Medicine. Project BOOST - Better Outcome by Optimizing Safe Transitions. http://www.hospitalmedicine.org/BOOST. Accessed June 8, 2013.
 
9. ØVretveit J, Bate P, Cleary P, et al. Quality collaboratives: lessons from research. Qual Saf Health Care 2002;11:345-351.
 
10. Caldwell DF, Chatman J, O’Reilly CA3rd, et al. Implementing strategic change in a health care system: the importance of leadership and change readiness. Health Care Manage Rev 2008;33:124-133.
 
11. Carlbom DJ, Rubenfeld GD. Barriers to implementing protocol-based sepsis resuscitation in the emergency department–results of a national survey. Crit Care Med 2007;35:2525-2532.
 
12. Hansen LO, Herrin J, Nembhard IM, et al. National quality campaigns: who benefits? Qual Saf Health Care 2010;19:275-278.
 
13. Lin MK, Marsteller JA, Shortell SM, et al. Motivation to change chronic illness care: results from a national evaluation of quality improvement collaboratives. Health Care Manage Rev 2005;30:139-156.
 
14. Saint S, Kowalski CP, Banaszak-Holl J, et al. How active resisters and organizational constipators affect health care-acquired infection prevention efforts. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2009;35:239-246.
 
15. Ziegenfuss JT Jr. Organizational barriers to quality improvement in medical and health care organizations. Qual Assur Util Rev 1991;6:115-122.
 
16. Hagg HW, Workman-Germann J, Flanagan M, et al. Implementation of Systems Redesign: Approaches to Spread and Sustain Adoption Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 2: Culture and Redesign). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality;2008.
 
17. Kaplan HC, Brady PW, Dritz MC, et al. The influence of context on quality improvement success in health care: a systematic review of the literature. Milbank Q 2010;88:500-559.
 
18. Shortell SM, Bennett CL, Byck GR. Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement on clinical practice: what it will take to accelerate progress. Milbank Q 1998;76:510,593-510,624.
 
19. National Information Center on Health Services Research and Health Care Technology Dissemination and implementation science. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/hsrinfo/implementation_science.html. Accessed November 27, 2013.
 
20. Arksey H, Knight P. Interviewing for Social Scientists: An Introductory Resource with Examples, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1999.
 
21. Linstone H, Turoff M. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
 
22. Babbie E.The Practice of Social Research, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2009.
 
23. SurveyMonkey. http://www.surveymonkey.com. Accessed November 27, 2013.
 
24. Messner K. Barriers to implementing a quality improvement program. Nurs Manage 1998;29:32-36.
 
25. Grol R, Zwaard A, Mokkink H, et al. Dissemination of guidelines: which sources do physicians use in order to be informed? Int J Qual Health Care 1998;10:135-140.
 
26. Li J, Hansen L, Patel A, Young R, Williams MV. Mentored implementation of Project BOOST-outcomes of a statewide initiative: Hospital Medicine 2013. Paper presented at: Hospital Medicine 2013; May 16Y19, 2013;National Harbor, Maryland.
 
27. Balaban RB, Weissman JS, Samuel PA, et al. Redefining and redesigning hospital discharge to enhance patient care: a randomized controlled study. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:1228-1233.
 
28. Dedhia P, Kravet S, Bulger J, et al. A quality improvement intervention to facilitate the transition of older adults from three hospitals back to their homes. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009;57:1540-1546.
 
29. Halasyamani L, Kripalani S, Coleman E, et al. Transition of care for hospitalized elderly patientsVdevelopment of a discharge checklist for hospitalists. J Hosp Med 2006;1:354-360.
 
30. Jack BW, Chetty VK, Anthony D, et al. A reengineered hospital discharge program to decrease rehospitalization: a randomized trial.Ann Intern Med 2009;150:178-187.
 
31. Koehler BE, Richter KM, Youngblood L, et al. Reduction of 30-day postdischarge hospital readmission or emergency department (ED) visit rates in high-risk elderly medical patients through delivery of a targeted care bundle. J Hosp Med 2009;4:211-218.
 
32. Epstein AM. Revisiting readmissionsVchanging the incentives for shared accountability. New Engl J Med 2009;360:1457-1459.
 
33. Snow V, Beck D, Budnitz T, et al. Transitions of Care Consensus Policy Statement, American College of Physicians-Society of General Internal Medicine-Society of Hospital Medicine-American Geriatrics Society-American College of Emergency Physicians-Society of Academic Emergency Medicine. J Gen Intern Med 2009;24:971-976.
 
34. Williams MV, Coleman E. BOOSTing the hospital discharge. J Hosp Med 2009;4:209-210.