Original Article

Public Attitudes Toward Smoking Bans in a Tobacco-producing County

Authors: Richard Wilson, DHSC, MPH, David F. Duncan, DRPH, Thomas Nicholson, PHD, MPH

Abstract

Objectives: Allen County, KY, is a rural county with a population of approximately 18,000. The county has a tobacco crop and is in a state in which tobacco interests are influential. The tobacco control program at the public health department developed a goal to reduce environmental tobacco smoke by restricting smoking in public places. To progress toward that goal, a public opinion poll was conducted to determine citizens’ views regarding smoking restrictions in the county courthouse.


Methods: A telephone survey was conducted using the Allen County telephone directory as a sampling frame. The survey instrument included questions on support for smoking restrictions in the courthouse, restaurants, and workplaces as well as support for increasing Kentucky’s cigarette tax. Interviews with 374 individuals—53.6% of the initial sample—were completed.


Results: Banning all smoking in the Allen County Courthouse was supported by 163 (43.4%) of the respondents. Designated smoking areas were supported by 168 (44.7%) of the respondents. Twenty-four (6.4%) of the respondents opposed any smoking restrictions at the courthouse. Women were more likely to support a ban on all smoking at the courthouse (45.4% compared with 40%). Males were more likely to support designated smoking areas (46.2% of males versus 43.8% of females). There was a small association between opposition to smoking restrictions at the courthouse and smoking by the respondent. An increase in Kentucky’s cigarette tax was supported by 132 (35.1%) of the respondents and opposed by 184 (48.9%). There was no association between ownership of a tobacco-farming allotment and opinion regarding any of the tobacco control measures.


Conclusions: Most Allen County residents support some form of restriction on smoking in public places (including the county courthouse and restaurants) and in workplaces. Only approximately one-third, however, supported an increase in the cigarette tax, perhaps reflecting a general antitax feeling. Ownership of tobacco allotments does not appear to be an important factor in determining attitudes on smoking control issues.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. McGinnis JM, Foege WH. Actual causes of death in the United States. JAMA 1993;270:2207–2212.
 
2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010: With Understanding and Improving Health and Objectives for Improving Health. Washington, DC, U.S. Government Printing Office, November 2000, ed 2, 2 vols. Available at: http://www.healthypeople.gov/document/. Accessed September 3, 2003.
 
3. Kentucky Department for Public Health. Healthy Kentuckians 2010. Frankfort, KY, Kentucky Department for Public Health. Available at: http://chs.ky.gov/publichealth/healthy_ky_2010.htm. Accessed September 3, 2003.
 
4. Stapleton MP, Palmer CT. Cigarette smoking in Kentucky: Smoking-attributable mortality and years of potential life lost. J Ky Med Assoc 1998;96:451–455.
 
5. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Respiratory Health Effects of Passive Smoking: Lung Cancer and Other Disorders (Pub. No. EPA/600/6-90/006F). Washington, DC, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1992.
 
6. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Smoking. A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1986.
 
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. State-specific prevalence of cigarette smoking among adults, and children’s and adolescents’ exposure to environmental tobacco smoke: United States, 1996.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1997;46:1038 –1043.
 
8. Arias DC. New York City Mayor pursues public indoor smoking ban. The Nation’s Health, Oct 2002, p 6.
 
9. Pierce JP, Evans N, Farkas AJ, et al. Tobacco Use in California: An Evaluation of the Tobacco Control Program, 1989–93. La Jolla, CA, University of California, San Diego, 1994.
 
10. Abt Associates. Independent Evaluation of the Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program (2nd annual report). Cambridge, MA, Abt Associates, 1996.
 
11. Chaloupka F, Grossman M. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 5740.Cambridge, MA, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1996.
 
12. U.S. Department of the Treasury. The Economic Costs of Smoking in the United States and the Benefits of Comprehensive Tobacco Legislation (Department of the Treasury working paper series). Washington, DC, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1998.
 
13. General Accounting Office. Teen Smoking: Higher Excise Tax Should Significantly Reduce the Number of Smokers (GAO/HRD 89-119). Rockville, MD: General Accounting Office, 1989.
 
14. U.S. Census Bureau. 2001 Population Estimate. Available at:http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/21/21003.html
 
15. Hahn EJ, Plymale MA, Rayens MK. Kentucky Youth Tobacco Survey 2000: Tobacco Use Prevention and Cessation Program. Frankfort, KY, Kentucky Department for Public Health, 2001.
 
16. Johnston D, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG. Cigarette smoking among American teens declines sharply in 2001. Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan News and Information Services, December 19, 2001.
 
17. Saad L. Gallup Poll In-Depth Analyses: Tobacco and Smoking (August 2002). Available at:http://www.gallup.com/subscription/?m=f&c_id=9956
 
18. Samples K. Smokers in Kentucky have an attitude. Cincinnati Inquirer, Apr 9, 1998.
 
19. Mainous AG. Predictors of perceived risk from passive smoke among Kentuckians. Health Values1991;15(4):13–21.
 
20. Lacchetti C, Cohen J, Ashley MJ, et al. Is nicotine dependence related to smokers’ support for restrictions on smoking?Nicotine Tob Res 2001;3:257–260.
 
21. Gallup Organization. Gallup Poll Analyses—Smokers Bristle Over Cigarette Taxes. Available athttp://www.gallup.com/subscription/?m=f&c_id=11872
 
22. Hahn EJ, Rayens MK. Legislators’ views on tobacco policy: Are there regional differences in Kentucky?South Med J 2002;95:324–330.
 
23. O’Rourke D, Blair J. Improving random respondent selection in telephone surveys. J Mark Res1983;20:428–432.