Letter to the Editor
Response to “Predictors of Endoscopic and Laboratory Evaluation of Iron Deficiency Anemia in Hospitalized Patients”
Abstract
To the Editor:
The original article by Ioannou, Spector, and Rockey published in October's issue of this Journal could have been improved slightly. The prediction of iron deficiency could have been potentially enhanced by incorporating, in the screening protocol, not only the mean cell volume (MCV),1 but also the mean cell hemoglobin (MCH). This method was useful, for example, in a prospective study where 201 subjects were identified with iron deficiency anemia, the criterion for iron deficiency being a serum ferritin of less than 18 μg/L.2 Although the majority had MCV <80 fL as well as MCH <26 pg, the proportion of those with MCH <26 pg, on its own, was significantly greater than the proportion of those with MCV <80 fL on its own (P < 0.001).2
This content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($25)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.