Original Article

OPEN: Retaining Faculty from Underrepresented Groups in Academic Medicine: Results from a Needs Assessment

Authors: Ellen Childs, MA, PhD, Korede Yoloye, BA, Robina M. Bhasin, EdM, Emelia J. Benjamin, MD, ScM, Sabrina A. Assoumou, MD, MPH

Abstract

Objectives: Academic medical centers can improve the quality of care and address health inequities by recruiting and retaining faculty from underrepresented in medicine (URiM) groups; however, the retention of URiM faculty is a barrier to reaching equity-related goals because URiM faculty are less likely to remain in academia and be promoted compared with their peers. As such, the objective of this study was to determine factors that influence the retention of URiM faculty at large academic centers.

Methods: One-time, semistructured stay interviews were conducted to assess the experiences of URiM faculty at a large academic hospital in Boston, Massachusetts between October 2016 and April 2017. A qualitative researcher coded the transcripts and identified central themes.

Results: The participants (N = 17) were 65% Black/African American and 35% Hispanic/Latinx. The median number of years on faculty was 3 years (range 1–33). The themes identified through the stay interviews were grouped into three domains: areas of strength, challenges to advancement, and suggestions for improvement of support. Participants voiced leadership support in their development, the community of patients, URiM networking opportunities, and mentorship as strengths. The barriers to retention included the lack of transparency and trust in their work, a sense of tokenism, organizational management issues, and implicit biases. The suggested ways to improve support included the expanding of initiatives to include all members of groups URiM, continuing URiM faculty development programs, and increasing funding to support advancement.

Conclusions: This study underscored the importance of supportive leadership, URiM-specific faculty development programs, networking opportunities, and the recognition of achievements as factors that influence the retention of faculty at a large academic medical center. In addition, participants highlighted the need for strong mentor networks and emphasizing sponsorship.

Full Article

Having trouble viewing the article content below? Click here to open it directly.

Images

Download Image

Download Image

Download Image

References

1. Association of American Medical Colleges. US physician workforce data. Diversity in medicine: facts and figures. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/report/diversity-medicine-facts-and-figures-2019. Published 2019. Accessed November 10, 2022.
 
2. National Institutes of Health. Notice of NIH’s interest in diversity. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-20-031.html. Accessed November 10, 2022.
 
3. US Census Bureau. Quick facts. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045222. Published 2019. Accessed November 10, 2022.
 
4. Lett LA, Orji WU, Sebro R. Declining racial and ethnic representation in clinical academic medicine: a longitudinal study of 16 US medical specialties. PLoS One 2018;13:e0207274.
 
5. Merchant JL, Omary MB. Underrepresentation of underrepresented minorities in academic medicine: the need to enhance the pipeline and the pipe. Gastroenterology 2010;138:19-26.e1–e3.
 
6. Spector ND, Overholser B. COVID-19 and the slide backward for women in academic medicine. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e2021061.
 
7. Earley CP, Mosakowski E. Creating hybrid team cultures: an empirical test of transnational team functioning. Acad Manag J 2000;43:26–49.
 
8. Takeuchi J, Kass SJ, Schneider SK, et al. Virtual and face-to-face teamwork differences in culturally homogeneous and heterogeneous teams. J Psychol Issues Organ Cult 2013;4:17–34.
 
9. Freeman RB, Huang W. Collaboration: strength in diversity. Nat News 2014; 513:305.
 
10. AlShebli BK, Rahwan T, Woon WL. The preeminence of ethnic diversity in scientific collaboration. Nat Commun 2018;9:1–10.
 
11. Walker KO, Moreno G, Grumbach K. The association among specialty, race, ethnicity, and practice location among California physicians in diverse specialties. J Natl Med Assoc 2012;104:46–52.
 
12. Gomez LE, Bernet P. Diversity improves performance and outcomes. J Natl Med Assoc 2019;111:383–392.
 
13. Hsueh L, Hirsh AT, Maupomé G, et al. Patient–provider language concordance and health outcomes: a systematic review, evidence map, and research agenda. Med Care Res Rev 2021;78:3–23.
 
14. Schouten BC, Cox A, Duran G, et al. Mitigating language and cultural barriers in healthcare communication: toward a holistic approach. Patient Educ Couns 2020;S0738-3991(20)30242–1.
 
15. Marrast LM, Zallman L, Woolhandler S, et al. Minority physicians’ role in the care of underserved patients: diversifying the physician workforce may be key in addressing health disparities. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:289–291.
 
16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Attaining health equity. https:// https://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dch/programs/healthycommunitiesprogram/overview/healthequity.htm#:~:text=Achieving%20health%20equity%2C%20eliminating%20disparities. Published October 25, 2013. Accessed November 10, 2022.
 
17. Kaplan SE, Raj A, Carr PL, et al. Race/ethnicity and success in academic medicine: findings from a longitudinal multi-institutional study. Acad Med 2018;93(4):616–622.
 
18. Nikaj S, Roychowdhury D, Lund PK, et al. Examining trends in the diversity of the US National Institutes of Health participating and funded workforce. FASEB J 2018;32:6410–6422.
 
19. Stevens KR, Masters KS, Imoukhuede PI, et al. Fund Black scientists. Cell 2021;184:561–565.
 
20. Carson TL, Aguilera A, Brown SD, et al. A seat at the table: strategic engagement in service activities for early career faculty from underrepresented groups in the academy. Acad Med 2019;94:1089–1093.
 
21. Robeano K. “Stay interviews” to improve retention. Nurs Manage 2017;48:7–8.
 
22. Strauss A, Corbin J. Grounded theory methodology: an overview. In: Denzin N.K., Lincoln Y.S., eds., Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1994:273–285.
 
23. Saldaña J. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2015.
 
24. Feldman MD, Arean PA, Marshall SJ, et al. Does mentoring matter: results from a survey of faculty mentees at a large health sciences university. Med Educ Online 2010;April 23:15.
 
25. Guevara JP, Adanga E, Avakame E, et al. Minority faculty development programs and underrepresented minority faculty representation at US medical schools. JAMA 2013;310:2297–2304.
 
26. Rodríguez JE, Campbell KM, Pololi LH. Addressing disparities in academic medicine: what of the minority tax? BMC Med Educ 2015;15:1–5.
 
27. White-Davis T, Edgoose J, Speights JB, et al. Addressing racism in medical education an interactive training module. Fam Med 2018;50:364–368.
 
28. Edgoose J, Anderson A, Speights JB, et al. Toolkit for teaching about racism in the context of persistent health and healthcare disparities. Society of Teachers of Family Medicine. Published 2017. https://higherlogicdownload.s3-external-1.amazonaws.com/STFM/STFMTeachingracismtoolkit.201704272.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAVRDO7IEREB57R7MT&Expires=1674843934&Signature=%2FEUtakUGFIe7sxvTXEYV9Yk%2FZFo%3D. Published 2017. Accessed November 10, 2022.
 
29. Sue DW, Capodilupo CM, Torino GC, et al. Racial microaggressions in everyday life: implications for clinical practice. Am Psychol 2007;62:271–286.
 
30. Boston University Medical Campus Faculty Development & Diversity. Louis W. Sullivan, MD, academic leadership program. https://www.bumc.bu.edu/facdev-medicine/all-bumc/academic-leadership-program/. Published 2021. Accessed November 10, 2022.