Original Article

Risk Factors for Inadequate Colonoscopy Bowel Preparations in African Americans and Whites at an Urban Medical Center

Authors: Anoop Appannagari, MD, Shikha Mangla, MD, Chuanhong Liao, MS, K. Gautham Reddy, MD, Sonia S. Kupfer, MD

Abstract

Objectives: Poor bowel preparation leads to inadequate examinations and shorter surveillance intervals for colorectal cancer screening. Previous studies regarding risk factors for inadequate preparation have not included large numbers of African Americans. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of inadequate bowel preparation on initial and follow-up colonoscopy in a large, racially diverse patient population.

Methods: Colonoscopies performed during a 1-year period were analyzed retrospectively. Factors including age, sex, race, and start time were recorded. Patient ZIP codes were linked to census data to estimate education and income. For examinations with inadequate bowel preparations, we collected data on recommendations and the preparation quality of follow-up procedures.

Results: We included 3741 patients (40.2% African American). Of these, 66.9% had adequate bowel preparation and 33.1% had inadequate bowel preparation. African Americans had the highest prevalence of inadequate preparations at 43.0%. African American race was a predictor of inadequate bowel preparation, despite controlling for education and income. Age, male sex, and procedure taking place after 12 pm also were risk factors for inadequate preparation. Receipt of specific preparation instructions on the endoscopy report did not affect preparation quality on follow-up examination. Our study found a high rate (33.1%) of inadequate bowel preparations, and African American race was found to be an independent risk factor for inadequate preparation. We validated previously reported risk factors including age, male sex, and later procedure time. Finally, we noted high rates of inadequate preparation on follow-up examinations.

Conclusions: Improving the quality of colonoscopy bowel preparation is important for colorectal cancer prevention, especially in high-risk populations such as African Americans.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, et al. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010;60:277-300.
 
2. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European Multicenter Study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:378-384.
 
3. Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinovich DR, et al. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:1696-1700.
 
4. Lebwohl B, Wang TC, Neugut AI. Socioeconomic and other predictors of colonoscopy preparation quality. Dig Dis Sci 2010;55:2014-2020.
 
5. Shah N, Sanaka MR, Mullen KD, et al. Afternoon colonoscopies have higher failure rates compared to morning colonoscopies. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;60:2726-2730.
 
6. Chung YW, Han DS, Park KH, et al. Patient factors predictive of inadequate bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol: a prospective study in Korea. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008;43:448-452.
 
7. Siddiqui AA, Yang K, Spechler SJ, et al. Duration of the interval between the completion of bowel preparation and the start of colonoscopy predicts bowel-preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:700-706.
 
8. Ness RM, Manam R, Hoen H, et al. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:1797-1802.
 
9. Kazarian ES, Carreira FS, Toribara NW, et al. Colonoscopy completion in a large safety net health care system. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;6:438-442.
 
10. Nguyen DL, Weiland M. Risk Factors predictive of poor quality preparation during average risk colonoscopy screening: the importance of health literacy. J Gastrointest Liver Dis 2010;19:369-372.
 
11. Aronchick CA, Lipshutz WH, Wright H, et al. Validation of an instrument to assess colon cleansing. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:2667.
 
12. Krieger N. Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology. Am J Public Health 1992;82:703-710.
 
13. Diggle P, Heagerty P, Liang K-Y, et al.Analysis of Longitudinal Data. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002.
 
14. Liu X, Luo H, Zhang L, et al. Telephone-based re-education on the day before colonoscopy improves the quality of bowel preparation and the polyp detection rate: a prospective, colonoscopist-blinded, randomised, controlled study. Gut 2014;63:125-130.
 
15. Tae JW, Lee JC, Hong SJ, et al. Impact of patient education with cartoon visual aids on the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;76:804-811.
 
16. Serper M, Gawron AJ, Smith SG, et al. Patient factors that affect quality of colonoscopy preparation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;12:451-457.