Original Article

Role of Anxiety in the Comfort of Nonsedated Average-Risk Screening Sigmoidoscopy

Authors: XiaoLu Wu Carter, DO, FS, Ric Topolski, PhD, Christos Hatzigeorgiou, DO, MPH, Roger Keith Fincher, MD

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this prospective study was to assess the role of generalized anxiety disorder in the comfort of nonsedated, average-risk screening sigmoidoscopy.


Methods: Patients were asked to complete a screening questionnaire before undergoing average-risk colon cancer screening with nonsedated sigmoidoscopy. The questionnaire included demographic information and a series of Likert-based and visual analog scales designed to assess patient comfort, procedural symptom severity, and satisfaction. The Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders questionnaire was used to assess for generalized anxiety disorder. Comfort levels and postprocedural symptom severity were recorded immediately after the procedure and 1 week postprocedure. χ2 and t tests were used to analyze the data.


Results: Eighty-one patients were enrolled in the study. Twenty-seven patients tested positive for anxiety (high anxiety), whereas 54 tested negative (low anxiety). There were no differences in anxiety according to sex (P = 0.53), or age (P = 0.32). There was no difference in reaching the splenic flexure between high- and low-anxiety patients (P = 0.15); however, pairwise comparisons revealed patients with high anxiety reported significantly higher levels of abdominal pain after the procedure (P < 0.01) and still recalled higher pain from the procedure 1 week later (P < 0.01) than those patients with low anxiety scores. Furthermore, those patients with high anxiety reported significantly more procedure-related cramping and bloating both immediately after the procedure and again 1 week later (P < 0.01). Finally, patients with high anxiety reported the procedure as being more uncomfortable 1 week later, when compared with low-anxiety patients (P = 0.01).


Conclusions: The level of anxiety correlated directly to pain and discomfort postprocedure and related inversely to the level of satisfaction. Better management of anxiety may lead to better procedural comfort in nonsedated procedures.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Munafò M, Stevenson J. Anxiety and surgical recovery. Reinterpreting the literature. J Psychosom Res 2001; 51: 589–596.
 
2. De Groot KI, Boeke S, van den Berge HJ, et al. Assessing long and short term recovery from lumbar surgery with preoperative biographical medical and psychological variables. Br J Health Psychol 1997; 2: 229–243.
 
3. Maranets I, Kain ZN. Preoperative anxiety and intraoperative anesthetic requirements. Anesth Analg1999; 89: 1346–1351.
 
4. Tam WW, Wong EL, Twinn SF. Effect of music on procedure time and sedation during colonoscopy: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14: 5336–5343.
 
5. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, et al. Anxiety disorders in primary care prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection. Ann Intern Med 2007; 146: 317–325.
 
6. Keefer L, Savuk G, Bratten J, et al. Multicenter study of gastroenterologists’ ability to identify anxiety and depression in a new patient encounter and its impact on diagnosis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008; 42: 667–671.
 
7. Jones MP, Ebert CC, Sloan T, et al. Patient anxiety and elective gastrointestinal endoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol 2004; 38: 35–40.
 
8. Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Kroenke K, et al. Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care. The PRIME-MD 1000 study. JAMA 1994; 272: 1749–1756.
 
9. Hong JY, Jee YS, Luthardt FW. Comparison of conscious sedation for oocyte retrieval between low-anxiety and high-anxiety patients. J Clin Anesth 2005; 17: 549–553.
 
10. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Luschene R, et al. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1983.
 
11. Kirmayer L, Robbins JM, Dworkind M, et al. Somatization and the recognition of depression and anxiety in primary care. Am J Psychiatry 1993; 150: 734–741.
 
12. Koch ME, Kain ZN, Ayoub C, et al. The sedative and analgesic sparing effect of music. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 300–306.
 
13. Lang EV, Joyce JS, Spiegel D, et al. Self- hypnotic relaxation during interventional radiological procedure: effects on pain perception and intravenous drug use. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 1996; 44: 106–119.
 
14. Lang EV, Rosen MP. Cost analysis of adjunct hypnosis with sedation during outpatient interventional radiologic procedures. Radiology 2002; 222: 375–382.
 
15. Lang EV, Benotsch EG, Fick LJ, et al. Adjunctive non-pharmacological analgesia for invasive medical procedures: a randomized trial. Lancet 2000; 355: 1486–1490.
 
16. Weinstein EJ, Au PK. Use of hypnosis before and during angioplasty. Am J Clin Hypn 1991; 34: 29–37.
 
17. Arntz A, Dreessen L, Merckelbach H. Attention, not anxiety, influences pain. Behav Res Ther 1991; 29: 41–50.
 
18. Klages U, Kianifard S, Ulusoy O, et al. Anxiety sensitivity as predictor of pain in patients undergoing restorative dental procedures. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2006; 34: 139–145.
 
19. Schupp CJ, Berbaum K, Berbaum M, et al. Pain and anxiety during interventional radiologic procedures: effect of patients’ state anxiety at baseline and modulation by nonpharmacologic analgesia adjuncts. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16: 1585–1592.
 
20. Harikumar R, Raj M, Paul A, et al. Listening to music decreases need for sedative medication during colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial. Indian J Gastroenterol 2006; 25: 3–5.
 
21. Ikonomidou E, Rehnström A, Naesh O. Effect of music on vital signs and postoperative pain. AORN J 2004; 80: 269–274, 277-278.
 
22. Corah NL, Gale EN, Pace LF. Relaxation and musical programming as means of reducing psychological stress during dental procedures. J Am Dent Assoc 1981; 103: 232–234.
 
23. Lepage C, Drolet P, Girard M, et al. Music decrease sedative requirements during spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 912–916.
 
24. Bugbee ME, Wellisch DK, Arnott IM, et al. Breast core-needle biopsy: clinical trial of relaxation technique versus medication versus no intervention for anxiety reduction. Radiology 2005; 234: 73–78.
 
25. Christe C, Janssens JP, Armenian B, et al. Midazolam sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in older persons: a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000; 48: 1398–1403.
 
26. Mui LM, Teoh AY, Ng EK, et al. Premedication with orally administered midazolam in adults undergoing diagnostic upper endoscopy; a double blind placebo controlled randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 195–200.
 
27. Yi SY, Shin JE. Midazolam for patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective, single-blind and randomized study to determine the appropriate amount and time of initiation of endoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 20: 1873–1879.