Original Article

Sex Differences in Analgesia: A Randomized Trial of μ versus κ Opioid Agonists

Authors: Penny L. Miller, MS, FNP, Amy A. Ernst, MD, FACEP

Abstract

Objectives: We sought to evaluate whether there is a sex difference in the analgesic response to μ versus κ opioids in the management of acute moderate to severe pain of injury in the emergency department.


Methods: The study was a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial comparing the prototypical μ-receptor agonist, morphine sulfate, to the prototypical κ agonist, butorphanol. The primary endpoints were degree of relief by visual analog scores at 30 and 60 minutes. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney U test for nonparametric analysis and repeated-measures analysis of variance.


Results: Ninety-four patients were entered in the study, with 49 (52%) males and 45 (48%) females. Forty-six received morphine sulfate and 48 received butorphanol. There was no difference in demographics in the two groups. At 60 minutes, females had significantly lower visual analog scores with butorphanol compared with morphine (P = 0.046). At 60 minutes, there was a trend for a difference in response of males versus females to morphine, with males responding better than females (P = 0.06).


Conclusion: Females had better pain scores with butorphanol than morphine at 60 minutes.


Acute painful injuries due to trauma are frequent presenting complaints in the emergency department (ED). Treatment for these patients is paramount for several reasons. Pain accounts for more than 30 million ED visits annually in the United States, and inadequate relief of pain is a frequent cause of return visits to the ED. Pain is often referred to as the fifth vital sign. Assessment of pain, as well as aggressive and effective relief of pain, is mandated by new standards published by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. 1,2 Unrelieved pain has adverse physical and psychological effects. The consequences of ineffective pain control may include further injury to an already compromised limb, difficulty with reduction of a fracture or other definitive treatment, and the inability of a patient to participate in his or her medical care.


Two commonly used opioid analgesics for uncomplicated patients are morphine sulfate and butorphanol. Both are opioids; however, their mechanism of action differs in that morphine acts as a μ receptor agonist and butorphanol primarily as a κ agonist. 3 Preliminary studies suggest that there may be a sex difference in response to the site of action of these two medications. Females may receive more relief and fewer side effects from those acting at κ sites. Past studies comparing male versus female responses to κ agonists have involved oral and IV medications for dental pain. 4–6 There are no previous studies comparing the two medications between the sexes for acute injury.


The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the overall sex differences in the analgesic response to the parenteral agents morphine and butorphanol for the relief of moderate to severe painful injuries secondary to trauma in the ED. The main outcome measures were degree of relief at 30 and 60 minutes in males and females. The null hypothesis was that morphine and butorphanol would be equally effective in relief of pain in males and females.


Key Points


* Butorphanol and morphine are commonly used pain medications in the emergency department.


* Butorphanol is a κ agonist and morphine is a μ agonist.


* Females preferred butorphanol (κ agonist) to morphine for pain management in acute injury.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Ducharme J. Acute pain and pain control: State of the art. Ann Emerg Med 2000; 35: 592–603.
 
2. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Pain Standards for 2004. Available at: http://www.jcaho.org/accredited+organizations/2004+standards.htm. Accessed July 2, 2003.
 
3. Reisine T, Pasternak G. Opioid analgesics and antagonists, in Hardman JG, Limbird LE (eds): Goodman and Gilman’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1996, ed 9, pp 569–620.
 
4. Gear RW, Miaskowski C, Gordon NC, et al. κ-opioids produce significantly greater analgesia in women than in men. Nat Med 1996; 2: 1248–1250.
 
5. Gear RW, Gordon NC, Heller PH, et al. Gender difference in analgesic response to the κ-opioid pentazocine. Neurosci Lett 1996; 205: 207–209.
 
6. Gear RW, Miaskowski C, Gordon NC, et al. The κ opioid nalbuphine produces gender- and dose-dependent analgesia and antianalgesia in patients with postoperative pain. Pain 1999; 83: 339–345.
 
7. Scott J, Huskisson EC. Graphic representation of pain. Pain 1976; 2: 175–184.
 
8. SPSS statistical package. Chicago, SPSS, Inc.
 
9. Millan MJ. Multiple opioid systems and pain. Pain 1986; 27: 303–347.
 
10. Snyder SH. Opiate receptors and internal opiates. Sci Am 1977; 236: 44–56.
 
11. Snyder SH. Drug and neurotransmitter receptors in the brain. Science 1984; 224: 22–31.
 
12. Wood PL. Multiple opiate receptors: Support for unique μ, δ and κ sites. Neuropharmacology 1982; 21: 487–497.
 
13. Physicians’ Desk Reference 2003. Montvale, NJ, Medical Economics Co., 2003, ed 57.
 
14. Cicero TJ, Nock B, Meyer ER. Gender-related differences in the antinociceptive properties of morphine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1996; 279: 767–773.
 
15. Craft RM, Kalivas PW, Stratmann JA. Sex differences in discriminative stimulus effects of morphine in the rat. Behav Pharmacol 1996; 7: 764–778.
 
16. Craft RM, Bernal SA. Sex differences in opioid antinociception: κ and “mixed action” agonists. Drug Alcohol Depend 2001; 63: 215–228.
 
17. Barrett AC, Smith ES, Picker MJ. Sex-related differences in mechanical nociception and antinociception produced by μ- and κ-opioid receptor agonists in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 2002; 452: 163–173.
 
18. Islam AK, Cooper ML, Bodnar RJ. Interactions among aging, gender, and gonadectomy effects upon morphine antinociception in rats. Physiol Behav 1993; 54: 45–53.
 
19. Kepler KL, Kest B, Kiefel JM, et al. Roles of gender, gonadectomy and estrous phase in the analgesic effects of intracerebroventricular morphine in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1989; 34: 119–127.
 
20. Negus SS, Mello NK. Effects of gonadal steroid hormone treatments on opioid antinociception in ovariectomized rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2002; 159: 275–283.
 
21. Dawson-Basoa ME, Gintzler AR. Estrogen and progesterone activate spinal κ-opiate receptor analgesic mechanisms. Pain 1996; 64: 608–615.
 
22. Dawson-Basoa ME, Gintzler AR. 17-β-estradiol and progesterone modulate an intrinsic opioid analgesic system. Brain Res 1993; 601: 241–245.
 
23. Gintzler AR. Endorphin-mediated increases in pain threshold during pregnancy. PubMed | CrossRef
 
24. Sander HW, Portoghese PS, Gintzler AR. Spinal κ-opiate receptor involvement in the analgesia of pregnancy: Effects of intrathecal nor-binaltorphimine, a κ-selective antagonist. Brain Res 1988; 474: 343–347.
 
25. Bartok RE, Craft RM. Sex differences in opioid antinociception. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1997; 282: 769–778.
 
26. Gordon NC, Gear RW, Heller PH, et al. Enhancement of morphine analgesia by the GABAB agonist baclofen. Neuroscience 1995; 69: 345–349.
 
27. Unruh AM, Ritchie J, Merskey H. Does gender affect appraisal of pain and pain coping strategies? Clin J Pain 1999; 15: 31–40.
 
28. Kelly AM. Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age, or cause of pain? Acad Emerg Med 1998; 5: 1086–1090.
 
29. LaChapelle DL, Hadjistavropoulos T, Craig KD. Pain measurement in persons with intellectual disabilities. Clin J Pain 1999; 15: 13–23.