Original Article

Sharpening the Tandem Walking Test for Screening Peripheral Neuropathy

Authors: Helen S. Cohen EdD, OTR, Ajitkumar P. Mulavara, PhD, Brian T. Peters, PhD, Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar, PhD, Doris H. Kung, DO, Dennis R. Mosier MD, PhD, Jacob J. Bloomberg, PhD

Abstract

Objective: Few tests of functional motor behavior are useful for rapidly screening people for lower extremity peripheral neuropathy. The goal of this study was to improve the widely used tandem walking (TW) test.

Methods: We tested “normal” (control) adult and ambulatory patients with peripheral neuropathy (PN) with their eyes open and eyes closed while they performed TW on industrial carpeting in sock-covered feet. Each subject wore a torso-mounted inertial motion unit to measure kinematic data. The data of subjects with PN also were compared with historical data on patients with vestibular impairments.

Results: The normal and PN groups differed significantly on TW and on the number of steps completed. PN and vestibular impairments data also differed significantly on both visual conditions. Kinematic data showed that patients with PN were more unstable than normal patients in the group. For the number of steps taken during the eyes open condition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) values were only 0.81 and for the number of steps taken during the eyes closed condition, ROC values were 0.88. Although not optimal, this ROC value is better. Sensitivity and specificity at a cutoff of two steps were 0.81 and 0.92, respectively, and at a cutoff of three steps were 0.86 and 0.75, respectively. ROC values for kinematic data were <0.8, and when combined with the ROC value for the number of steps, the total ROC value did not improve appreciably.

Conclusions: Although not ideal for screening patients who may have PN, counting the number of steps during TW is a quick and useful clinical test. TW is most sensitive to patients with PN when they are tested with eyes closed.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Hullar T, Zee D, Minor L. Evaluation of the patient with dizziness. In: Flint PW, Haughey BH, Lund VJ, et al. , eds. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Elsevier, 2010; 2304–2327.
 
2. Mallinson AI, Longridge NS. Increasing the usefulness of tandem walking evaluation. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008; 37: 860–864.
 
3. Ropper AH, Samuels MA. Adams and Victor’s Principles of Neurology, 9th ed. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2009; .
 
4. Simon RP, Greenberg DA, Aminoff MJ. , eds. Clinical Neurology, 7th ed. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2009; .
 
5. Hoskovcová M, Ulmanová O, Sprdlík O, et al. Disorders of balance and gait in essential tremor are associated with midline tremor and age. Cerebellum. 2013; 12: 27–34.
 
6. Di Nardo W, Ghirlanda G, Cercone S, et al. The use of dynamic posturography to detect neurosensorial disorder in IDDM without clinical neuropathy. J Diabetes Complications. 1999; 13: 79–85.
 
7. Emam AA, Gad AM, Ahmed MM, et al. Quantitative assessment of posture stability using computerised dynamic posturography in type 2 diabetic patients with neuropathy and its relation to glycaemic control. Singapore Med J. 2009; 50: 614–618.
 
8. Reid VA, Adbulhadi H, Black KR, et al. Using posturography to detect unsteadiness in 13 patients with peripheral neuropathy: a pilot study. Neurol Clin Neurophysiol. 2002; 2002: 2–8.
 
9. Shumway-Cook A, Horak FB. Assessing the influence of sensory interaction on balance. Phys Ther. 1986; 66: 1548–1550.
 
10. Fregly AR. Vestibular ataxia and its measurement in man. In: Kornhuber HH. , ed. Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1974; : 321–360.
 
11. Fregly AR, Graybiel A, Smith MJ. Walk on Floor Eyes Closed (WOFEC): a new addition to an ataxia test battery. Aerosp Med. 1972; 43: 395–399.
 
12. Mayo Clinic Department of Neurology. Mayo Clinic Examinations in Neurology, 7th ed. Rochester, MN, Mayo Clinic Foundation, 1998; .
 
13. Longridge NS, Mallinson AI. Clinical Romberg testing does not detect vestibular disease. Otol Neurotol. 2010; 31: 803–810.
 
14. Cohen HS, Mulavara AP, Peters BT, et al. Tests of walking balance for screening vestibular disorders. J Vestib Res. 2012; 22: 95–104.
 
15. Allum JHJ, Adkin AL, Carpenter MG, et al. Trunk sway measures of postural stability during clinical balance tests: effects of a unilateral vestibular deficit. Gait Posture. 2001; 14: 227–237.
 
16. Gill J, Allum JHJ, Carpenter MG, et al. Trunk sway measures of postural stability during clinical balance test: effects of age. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001; 56A: M438–M447.
 
17. Speers RA, Ashton-Miller JA, Schultz AB, et al. Age differences in abilities to perform tandem stand and walk tasks of graded difficulty. Gait Posture. 1998; 7: 207–213.
 
18. Vereeck L, Wuyts F, Truijen S, et al. Clinical assessment of balance: normative data, and gender and age effects. Int J Audiol. 2008; 47: 67–75.
 
19. Snijders T, Bosker R. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications, 1999; .
 
20. Fan J, Upadhye S, Worster A. Understanding receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. CJEM. 2006; 8: 19–20.
 
21. Cooper R, Kuh D, Cooper C, et al. Objective measures of physical capability and subsequent health: a systematic review. Age Ageing. 2011; 40: 14–23.
 
22. Cooper R, Kuh D, Hardy R, et al. Objectively measured physical capability levels and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010; 341: c4467