Original Article

Trends in Arkansas Motorcycle Trauma After Helmet Law Repeal

Authors: Gregory H. Bledsoe, MD, MPH, Guohua Li, MD, DRPH

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the impact of the 1997 Arkansas helmet law repeal on motorcycle registrations, crash and fatality risks, and alcohol involvement in motorcycle crashes.


Methods: Annual motorcycle registration data for the years 1990 through 2001 were obtained from the Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration. These motorcycle registration data were complemented by the motorcycle crash data from the Arkansas State Police Highway Safety Office and motorcycle fatality data for the state of Arkansas from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System. The impact of the repeal on crash rates, helmet usage, and alcohol involvement was assessed through comparisons of data from before (1993 to 1996) and after (1998 to 2001) the repeal.


Results: After the repeal, an increase in motorcycle registrations correlated with a marked rise in the total number of crashes and fatalities; however, fatalities per crash remained virtually the same. The proportion of motorcycle fatalities that were not wearing a helmet increased from 47.0% (47/100) before the repeal to 78.2% (104/133) after the repeal (P = 0.001). The overall percentage of fatal motorcycle crashes involving alcohol use remained unchanged after the repeal (37.6% [29/77] to 38.5% [40/104], P = 0.91), but the percentage of fatal crashes involving drinking nonhelmeted drivers increased from 14.2% (11/77) to 33.6% (35/104) (P = 0.003). Inebriated motorcyclists killed in crashes were overwhelmingly nonhelmeted (87.5%, 35/40) after the repeal, up from 37.9% (11/29) before the repeal (P < 0.001).


Conclusions: These findings suggest that the repeal of the mandatory helmet law in Arkansas has had a significant adverse effect on road safety.


Key Points


* The 1997 repeal of the Arkansas motorcycle helmet law correlated with an increase in nonhelmeted motorcycle driver deaths.


* Inebriated motorcyclists killed in crashes were overwhelmingly nonhelmeted.


* The injury rate per motorcycle crash increased significantly after the helmet law repeal.


* The repeal of the Arkansas mandatory motorcycle helmet law has had an adverse effect on road safety.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Bledsoe GH, Shexnayder SM, Carey MJ, et al. The negative impact of the repeal of the Arkansas motorcycle helmet law. J Trauma 2002;53:1078–1086.
 
2. Christian WJ, Carroll M, Meyer K, et al. Motorcycle helmets and head injuries in Kentucky, 1995–2000. J Ky Med Assoc 2003;101:21–26.
 
3. Hotz GA, Cohn SM, Popkin C, et al. The impact of a repealed motorcycle helmet law in Miami-Dade County. J Trauma 2002;52:469–474.
 
4. Brandt MM, Ahrns KS, Corpron CA, et al. Hospital cost is reduced by motorcycle helmet use. J Trauma 2002;53:469–471.
 
5. Lacey KJ. Motorcycle Helmet Cost in North Carolina. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center, 2001.
 
6. Branas CC, Knudson MM. Helmet laws and motorcycle rider death rates. Accid Anal Prev2001;33:641–648.
 
7. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Without Helmets We All Pay the Price. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, 1998.
 
8. Max W, Stark B, Root S. Putting a lid on injury costs: the economic impact of the California motorcycle helmet law. J Trauma 1998;45:550–556.
 
9. Rowland J, Rivara F, Salzburg P, et al. Motorcycle helmet use and injury outcome and hospitalization costs from crashes in Washington State. Am J Public Health 1996;86:41–45.
 
10. Kraus JF, Peek C, Shen H, et al. Motorcycle crashes: injuries, rider, crash and vehicle characteristics associated with helmet use. J Traffic Med 1995;23:29–35.
 
11. Gabella B, Reiner KL, Hoffman RE, et al. Relationship of helmet use and head injuries among motorcycle crash victims in El Paso County, Colorado, 1989–1990. Accid Anal Prev 1995;27:363–369.
 
12. Orsay EM, Muelleman RL, Peterson TD, et al. Motorcycle helmets and spinal injuries: dispelling the myth. Ann Emerg Med 1994;23:802–806.
 
13. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Traffic Safety Facts 2002: Motorcycles.Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, 2003.
 
14. Preusser DF, Hedlund JH, Ulmer RG. Evaluation of Motorcycle Helmet Law Repeal in Arkansas and Texas. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation HS 809 131, 2000.
 
15. Kelly P, Sanson T, Strange G, et al. A prospective study of the impact of helmet usage on motorcycle trauma. Ann Emerg Med 1991;20:852–856.
 
16. Braddock M, Schwartz R, Lapidus G, et al, A population-based study of motorcycle injury and costs. Ann Emerg Med 1992;21:273–278.
 
17. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Evaluation of Motorcycle Helmet Law Repeal in Arkansas and Texas. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, 2000.
 
18. Bledsoe GH. Arkansas and the motorcycle helmet law. J Ark Med Soc 2004;100:430–433.
 
19. Vaca F, Berns SD. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: Commentary: Motorcycle helmet law repeal—a tax assessment for the rest of the United States? Ann Emerg Med 2001;37:230–232.
 
20. Rollberg CA. The mandatory motorcycle helmet law issue in Arkansas: the cost of repeal. J Ark Med Soc 1990;86:312–316.
 
21. Nelson D, Sklar D, Skipper B, et al. Motorcycle fatalities in New Mexico: the association of helmet nonuse with alcohol intoxication. Ann Emerg Med 1992;21:279–283.
 
22. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Traffic Safety Facts 2001: Alcohol. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, 2002.
 
23. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Traffic Safety Facts 2001: Motorcycles.Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, 2002.
 
24. Sun SW, Kahn DM, Swan KG. Lowering the legal blood alcohol level for motorcyclists. Accid Anal Prev 1998;30:133–136.
 
25. Peek-Asa C, Kraus JF. Alcohol use, driver, and crash characteristics among injured motorcycle drivers. J Trauma 1996;41:989–993.
 
26. Luna GK, Maier RV, Sowder L, et al. The influence of ethanol intoxication on outcome of injured motorcyclists. J Trauma 1984;24:695–700.
 
27. Bray T, Szabo R, Timmerman L, et al. Cost of orthopedic injuries sustained in motorcycle accidents. JAMA 1985;254:2452–2453.
 
28. Rivara FP, Dicker BG, Bergman AB, et al. The public cost of motorcycle trauma. JAMA1988;260:221–223.
 
29. Motorcycle Industry Council. US Motorcycle Sales Increase for 10th Consecutive Year.http://www.motorcycles.org/PR/2002_PR_10yr_Increase.html. Accessed July 2002.
 
30. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Recent Trends in Fatal Motorcycle Crashes.Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, 2001.
 
31. Dawson DA, Grant BF, Chou SP, et al. Subgroup variation in US drinking patterns: Results of the 1992 national longitudinal alcohol epidemiologic study. J Subst Abuse 1995;7:331–344.
 
32. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Motorcycle Safety Program. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, 2003.
 
33. Colburn N, Meyer RD, Wrigley M, et al. Should motorcycles be operated within the legal alcohol limits for automobiles. J Trauma 1993;35:183–186.
 
34. Syner JW, Vegega ME. Impaired Motorcycle Riding: What Motorcyclists Think About Alcohol and Motorcycling. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2001.