Original Article

Unattended Sleep Studies in a VA Population: Initial Evaluation by Chart Review Versus Clinic Visit by a Midlevel Provider

Authors: Abdelhamid M. Alsharif, MD, Michelle Potts, RRT, R-PSGT, Regina Laws, RN, ANP, Amado X. Freire, MD, MPH, Ibrahim Sultan-Ali, MD, D-ABSM

Abstract

Objectives: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent disorder that is associated with multiple medical consequences. Although in-laboratory polysomnography is the gold standard for the diagnosis of OSA, portable monitors have been developed and studied to help increase efficiency and ease of diagnosis. We aimed to assess the adequacy of a midlevel provider specializing in sleep medicine to risk-stratify patients for OSA based on a chart review versus a comprehensive clinic evaluation before scheduling an unattended sleep study.

Methods: This study was an observational, nonrandomized, retrospective data collection by chart review of patients accrued prospectively who underwent an unattended sleep study at the Sleep Health Center at the Memphis Veterans Affairs Medical Center during the first 13 months of the program (May 1, 2011–May 31, 2012). A total of 205 patients were included in the data analysis.

Results: Analysis showed no statistically significant differences between chart review and clinic visit groups (P = 0.54) in terms of OSA diagnosis. Although not statistically significant, the analysis shows a trend toward higher mean age (50.3 vs 47.4 years; P = 0.10) and lower mean body mass index (34.4 vs 36.0; P = 0.08) in individuals who were evaluated during a comprehensive clinic visit. A statistically significant difference is seen in terms of the pretest clinical probability of OSA being moderate or high in 62.2% of patients in the clinic visit group and 95.7% in the chart review group, with a χ2 P ≤ 0.0001.

Conclusions: In the Veterans Health Administration’s system, the assessment of pretest probability may be determined by a midlevel provider using chart review with equal efficacy to a comprehensive face-to-face evaluation in terms of OSA diagnosis via unattended sleep studies.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Molnar MZ, Mucsi I, Novak M, et al. Association of incident obstructive sleep apnoea with outcomes in a large cohort of US veterans. Thorax 2015;70:888-895.
 
2. Edwards BA, Wellman A, Owens RL. PSGs: more than just the AHI. J Clin Sleep Med 2013;9:527-528.
 
3. Young T, Peppard PE, Gottlieb DJ. Epidemiology of obstructive sleep apnea: a population health perspective. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165:1217-1239.
 
4. Freedman N. COUNTERPOINT: does laboratory polysomnography yield better outcomes than home sleep testing? No. Chest 2015;148:308-310.
 
5. Masa JF, Duran-Cantolla J, Capote F, et al. Effectiveness of home single-channel nasal pressure for sleep apnea diagnosis. Sleep 2014;37:1953-1961.
 
6. Pack AI. POINT: does laboratory polysomnography yield better outcomes than home sleep testing? Yes. Chest 2015;148:306-308.
 
7. Walia R, Achilefu A, Crawford S, et al. Are at-home sleep studies performed using portable monitors (PMs) as effective at diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in adults as sleep laboratory-based polysomnography (PSG)? J Okla State Med Assoc 2014;107:642-644.
 
8. Collop NA. Portable monitoring for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2008;14:525-529.
 
9. Cairns A, Poulos G, Bogan R. Who is getting tested for obstructive sleep apnea using a portable recording system? Test results from 193,221 patients. J Clin Sleep Med 2014;10:1193-1198.
 
10. Collop N. Home sleep testing: appropriate screening is the key. Sleep 2012;35:1445-1446.
 
11. Collop NA, Anderson WM, Boehlecke B, et al. Clinical guidelines for the use of unattended portable monitors in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in adult patients. Portable Monitoring Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. J Clin Sleep Med 2007;3:737-747.
 
12. Bruyneel M, Ninane V. Unattended home-based polysomnography for sleep disordered breathing: current concepts and perspectives. Sleep Med Rev 2014;18:341-347.
 
13. Parthasarathy S. CON: thoughtful steps informed by more comparative effectiveness research is needed in home testing. J Clin Sleep Med 2013;9:9-12.
 
14. Cruz SD, Littner MR, Zeidler MR. Home sleep testing for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea-indications and limitations. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2014;35:552-559.
 
15. El Shayeb M, Topfer LA, Stafinski T, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of level 3 portable sleep tests versus level 1 polysomnography for sleep-disordered breathing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ 2014;186:E25-E51.
 
16. Santos-Silva R, Sartori DE, Truksinas V, et al. Validation of a portable monitoring system for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Sleep 2009;32:629-636.
 
17. Aurora RN, Swartz R, Punjabi NM. Misclassification of OSA severity with automated scoring of home sleep recordings. Chest 2015;147:719-727.
 
18. Ayas NT, Fox J, Epstein L, et al. Initial use of portable monitoring versus polysomnography to confirm obstructive sleep apnea in symptomatic patients: an economic decision model. Sleep Med 2010;11:320-324.
 
19. Campbell AJ, Neill AM. Home set-up polysomnography in the assessment of suspected obstructive sleep apnea. J Sleep Res 2011;20(1 Pt 2):207-213.
 
20. Tonelli de Oliveira AC, Martinez D, Vasconcelos LF, et al. Diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and its outcomes with home portable monitoring. Chest 2009;135:330-336.
 
21. Silva GE, Vana KD, Goodwin JL, et al. Identification of patients with sleep disordered breathing: comparing the four-variable screening tool, STOP, STOP-Bang, and Epworth Sleepiness Scales. J Clin Sleep Med 2011;7:467-472.
 
22. Zou J, Meng L, Liu Y, et al. Evaluation of a 2-channel portable device and a predictive model to screen for obstructive sleep apnea in a laboratory environment. Respir Care 2015;60:356-362.
 
23. Pereira EJ, Driver HS, Stewart SC, et al. Comparing a combination of validated questionnaires and level III portable monitor with polysomnography to diagnose and exclude sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med 2013;9:1259-1266.
 
24. Antic NA, Buchan C, Esterman A, et al. A randomized controlled trial of nurse-led care for symptomatic moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009;179:501-508.
 
25. Corral-Penafiel J, Pepin JL, Barbe F. Ambulatory monitoring in the diagnosis and management of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Eur Respir Rev 2013;22:312-324.
 
26. Burgess KR, Havryk A, Newton S, et al. Targeted case finding for OSA within the primary care setting. J Clin Sleep Med 2013;9:681-686.
 
27. Garg N, Rolle AJ, Lee TA, et al. Home-based diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in an urban population. J Clin Sleep Med 2014;10:879-885.
 
28. Nickerson J, Lee E, Nedelman M, et al. Feasibility of portable sleep monitors to detect obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in a vulnerable urban population. J Am Board Fam Med 2015;28:257-264.
 
29. Guerrero A, Embid C, Isetta V, et al. Management of sleep apnea without high pretest probability or with comorbidities by three nights of portable sleep monitoring. Sleep 2014;37:1363-1373.
 
30. Zheng H, Sowers M, Buysse DJ, et al. Sources of variability in epidemiological studies of sleep using repeated nights of in-home polysomnography: SWAN Sleep Study. J Clin Sleep Med 2012;8:87-96.