Original Article

Updated Estimates of Ectopic Pregnancy among Commercially and Medicaid-Insured Women in the United States, 2002–2013

Authors: Guoyu Tao, PhD, Chirag Patel, MPH, Karen W. Hoover, MD, MPH

Abstract

Objectives: To update trends in the rates of ectopic pregnancy, to compare rates of ectopic pregnancy between commercially insured and Medicaid-insured women, and to assess the differences in rates of ectopic pregnancy by different measures of ectopic pregnancy.

Methods: We analyzed data from 2002 to 2013 using the Truven Health MarketScan Commercial and Medicaid Claims Database. We limited the study population to women aged 15 to 44 years with any pregnancy in each year. Pregnancy and ectopic pregnancy were identified by clinical services with diagnostic or procedural codes. Ectopic pregnancy was measured in two ways: diagnosed and treated compared with diagnosed only; pregnancy was measured in two ways: any pregnancy compared with pregnancy with delivery.

Results: We did not observe a substantial trend in the rate of ectopic pregnancy from 2002 to 2013. The rate of diagnosed and treated ectopic pregnancy substantially increased by age: 0.29% in women aged 15 to 19 years and 0.89% in women aged 40 to 44 years among the commercially insured population and 0.23% and 0.85% among the Medicaid-insured population, respectively. The rate of ectopic pregnancy also varied by the different methodologies used to estimate rates.

Conclusions: The rate of ectopic pregnancy is relatively low and stable for women of reproductive age in the United States. Our findings highlight that it is important to clearly define the numerator and denominator in the measure of ectopic pregnancy rates.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Grimes DA. Estimation of pregnancy-related mortality risk by pregnancy outcome, United States, 1991 to 1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:92-94.
 
2. Creanga AA, Shapiro-Mendoza CK, Bish CL, et al. Trends in ectopic pregnancy mortality in the United States: 1980-2007. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:837-843.
 
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Ectopic pregnancy-United States, 1990-1992. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1995;44:46-48.
 
4. Van Den Eeden SK, Shan J, Bruce C, et al. Ectopic pregnancy rate and treatment utilization in a large managed care organization. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105( 5 Pt 1 ):1052-1057.
 
5. Stulberg DB, Cain LR, Dahlquist I, et al. Ectopic pregnancy rates in the Medicaid population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208:274 e1-7.
 
6. Hoover KW, Tao G, Kent CK. Trends in the diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:495-502.
 
7. Trabert B, Holt VL, Yu O, et al. Population-based ectopic pregnancy trends, 1993-2007. Am J Prev Med 2011;40:556-560.
 
8. Lipscomb GH. Ectopic pregnancy: still cause for concern. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:487-488.
 
9. Jones RK, Zolna MR, Henshaw SK, et al. Abortion in the United States: incidence and access to services, 2005. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2008;40:6-16.
 
10. Dennis A, Manski R, Blanchard K. Does medicaid coverage matter? A qualitative multi-state study of abortion affordability for low-income women. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2014;25:1571-1585.
 
11. Spiegelman D, Hertzmark E. Easy SAS calculations for risk or prevalence ratios and differences. Am J Epidemiol 2005;162:199-200.
 
12. Wasserstein RL, Lazar NA. The ASA' statement on p-values: context, process, and purpose. Am Stat 2016;70:129-133.
 
13. Zane SB, Kieke BA, Jr Kendrick JS, et al. Surveillance in a time of changing health care practices: estimating ectopic pregnancy incidence in the United States. Matern Child Health J 2002;6:227-236.
 
14. Dɺ DV, Le B, O' ME, et al. Patterns of health insurance coverage around the time of pregnancy among women with live-born infants-Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 29 states, 2009. MMWR Surveill Summ 2015;64:1-19.
 
15. Barnhart KT, Sammel MD, Gracia CR, et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in women with symptomatic first-trimester pregnancies. Fertil Steril 2006;86:36-43.
 
16. Bouyer J, Coste J, Shojaei T, et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a comprehensive analysis based on a large case-control, population-based study in France. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157:185-194.
 
17. Hoover KW, Leichliter JS, Torrone EA, et al. Chlamydia screening among females aged 15-21 years-multiple data sources, United States, 1999-2010. MMWR Suppl 2014;63:80-88.