Original Article
Virtual Residency Interviews during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Applicant’s Perspective
Abstract
Objectives: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a profound impact on medical education at all levels, particularly on applicants applying to residency programs. The objective of the study was to gain a comprehensive understanding of applicants’ perspectives on virtual interviews in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods: We conducted a quantitative survey and a qualitative study between March and April 2021. The link to an anonymous online survey was emailed to fourth-year medical students from one allopathic medical school. The survey link also was posted on the social media page of one allopathic medical school and one osteopathic medical school. Participants were then invited to participate in a follow-up 15- to 45-minute qualitative virtual interview.
Results: A total of 46 participants completed the survey, with a response rate of approximately 29.1%. The most beneficial aspect of the virtual interview was saving money on travel (31, 78.39%). In contrast, the least beneficial aspect of the virtual interview was the inability to personally explore the culture of the program (16, 34.78%), followed by the inability to explore the city and surrounding area (11, 23.91%). Thematic saturation was reached after interviewing 14 participants over Zoom. Four major themes of the virtual residency interview experience were discussed: virtual interviews offered many advantages, virtual interviews posed unique challenges, residency programs need more organizational improvements, and virtual specific preparations are needed.
Conclusions: Despite the challenges associated with the virtual interview process, applicants rated the overall virtual interview experience positively. Given the continued impact of COVID-19 on medical education, the majority of residency programs will elect to continue virtual interviews for the 2022 Electronic Residency Application Services cycle. We hope that our findings may provide insight into the applicant’s perspective on the virtual interview experience and help optimize virtual interviews for future cycles.
Posted in: Infectious Disease143
Full Article
Having trouble viewing the article content below? Click here to open it directly.
Images
References
1. Wolff M, Burrows H. Planning for virtual interviews: residency recruitment during a pandemic. Acad Pediatr 2021;21:24–31.
2. Zuo KJ, Retrouvey H, Wanzel KR. Factors that affect medical students’ perception and impression of a plastic surgery program: the role of elective rotations and interviews. Ann Plast Surg 2019;82:224–228.
3. Byrne L. Coalition for Physician Accountability releases recommendations on 2021-22 residency season interviewing. https://www.nrmp.org/coalitionrecommendations-2021-22-interviewing. Published August 25, 2021. Accessed October 10, 202.
4. Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Choosing among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2007.
5. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)— a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377–381.
6. Zoom. Home page. https://explore.zoom.us/en/products/meetings/. Accessed April 21, 2021.
7. Otter Voice Meeting Notes. https://otter.ai/. Accessed April 26, 2021.
8. Vining CC, Eng OS, Hogg ME, et al. Virtual surgical fellowship recruitment during COVID-19 and its implications for resident/fellow recruitment in the future. Ann Surg Oncol 2020;27(suppl 3):911–915.
9. Day RW, Taylor BM, Bednarski BK, et al. Virtual interviews for surgical training program applicants during COVID-19: lessons learned and recommendations. Ann Surg 2020;272:e144–e147.
10. Hill MV, Ross EA, Crawford D, et al. Program and candidate experience with virtual interviews for the 2020 Complex General Surgical Oncology interview season during the COVID pandemic. Am J Surg 2021;222:99–103.
11. Association of American Medical Colleges. The cost of applying for medical residency. https://students-residents.aamc.org/financial-aid-resources/cost-applying-medical-residency. Accessed April 21, 2021.
12. Kerfoot BP, Asher KP, McCullough DL. Financial and educational costs of the residency interview process for urology applicants. Urology 2008;71: 990–994.
13. Watson SL, Hollis RH, Oladeji L, et al. The burden of the fellowship interview process on general surgery residents and programs. J Surg Educ 2017;74:167–172.
14. Daram SR, Wu R, Tang SJ. Interview from anywhere: feasibility and utility of web-based videoconference interviews in the gastroenterology fellowship selection process. Am J Gastroenterol 2014;109:155–159.
15. Murphy B. Residency Match: concerns emerge about distribution of interview slots. https://www.ama-assn.org/medical-students/preparing-residency/residency-match-concerns-emerge-about-distribution-interview. Published January 12, 2021. Accessed April 20, 2021.
16. Weissbart SJ, Kim SJ, Feinn RS, et al. Relationship between the number of residency applications and the yearly Match rate: time to start thinking about an application limit? J Grad Med Educ 2015;7:81–85.
17. Berger JS, Cioletti A. Viewpoint from 2 graduate medical education deans application overload in the residency Match process. J Grad Med Educ 2016;8:317–321.
18. Lewit R, Gosain A. Virtual interviews may fall short for pediatric surgery fellowships: lessons learned From COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2. J Surg Res 2021; 259:326–331.
19. Patel TY, Bedi HS, Deitte LA, et al. Brave new world: challenges and opportunities in the COVID-19 virtual interview season. Acad Radiol 2020; 27:1456–1460.
