Original Article

Vision Screening in Adults Across the Life Span

Authors: Helen S. Cohen, EdD, OTR, Jasmine Stitz, MS, Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar, PhD, Susan P. Williams, MD

Abstract

Objectives: The goal of this study was to determine whether adults across the life span differ in responses to quick vision screening and how those responses relate to adults’ use of specialized eye care.

Methods: Subjects were 363 community-dwelling ambulatory adults, 21 to 95 years old, who were tested while they wore their corrective lenses during routine visits to a tertiary care facility. No subjects had known neurological impairments, age-related macular degeneration, or other significant eye disease. A wall-mounted Early Treatment in Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart was used.

Results: Older adults 58 years old or older had significantly worse scores than younger adults. Scores did not differ between subjects who had been tested within or prior to the last 10 months. Older subjects had their vision tested significantly more recently than younger subjects.

Conclusions: Vision screening is quick, inexpensive, and easily performed by ancillary staff, and it may provide the physician with useful additional information for treatment planning.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Chou R, Dana T, Bougatsos C, et al. Screening for impaired visual acuity in older adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2016;315:915-933.
 
2. Yip JL, Khawaja AP, Broadway D, et al. Visual acuity, self-reported vision and falls in the EPIC-Norfolk Eye study. Br J Ophthalmol 2014;98:377-382.
 
3. Wu TY, Chie WC, Yang RS, et al. Risk factors for single and recurrent falls: a prospective study of falls in community dwelling seniors without cognitive impairment. Prev Med 2013;57:511-517.
 
4. Reed-Jones RJ, Solis GR, Lawson KA, et al. Vision and falls: a multidisciplinary review of the contributions of visual impairment to falls amoung older adults. Maturitas 2013;75:22-28.
 
5. Russell MA, Hill KD, Day LM, et al. Development of the Falls Risk for Older People in the Community (FROP-Com) screening tool. Age Ageing 2009;38:40-46.
 
6. Yardley L, Beyer N, Hauer K, et al. Development and initial validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). Age Ageing 2005;34:614-619.
 
7. Treacy MP, Hurst TP, Conway M, et al. The early treatment in diabetic retinopathy study chart compared with the Tumbline-E and Landolt-C. Ophthalmology 2015;122:1062-1063.e1.
 
8. Ferris FL, 3rd Kassoff A, Bresnick GH, et al. New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol 1982;94:91-96.
 
9. Texas Medical Advisory Board. Guide for determining driver limitation. http://www.txacp.org/files/Guide%20for%20Determining.pdf. Revised March 2014. Accessed November 14, 2017.
 
10. American Medical Association. Physician' Guide to Assessing and Counseling Older Drivers, 2nd ed. https://www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/nti/older_drivers/pdf/811298.pdf. Accessed November 14, 2017.
 
11. American Optometric Association. Comprehensive eye and vision examination. https://www.aoa.org/patients-and-public/caring-for-your-vision/comprehensive-eye-and-vision-examination. Accessed November 24, 2017.