Abstract
Background Patient comfort is an important part of laceration repair. Methods The study was a randomized single-blind cross-over trial in which each participant received 250 ml warmed and 250 ml room temperature saline irrigation in simple linear wounds after a local anesthetic was instilled. The solutions and the order of irrigation (warmed first versus second) were separately randomized with a washout period between. Investigators obtaining scores were blinded. Participants determined preferred solution, whether the solution was soothing, and which caused the most discomfort. Participants rated the pain of irrigation using separate Visual Analog Scale scores. Results Thirty-eight patients were enrolled in the study. Significantly more preferred warmed to room temperature solutions (difference, 34%; 95% confidence interval, 5.7–63). A Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired data showed no order effect (P = 0.49) or difference in pain measured according to the Visual Analog Scale (P = 0.082). Conclusion Warmed saline was more comfortable and soothing than room temperature saline as a wound irrigant among patients with linear lacerations.
This content is limited to qualifying members.
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
References
References 1. Chisholm CD. Wound evaluation and cleansing. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1992; 10: 665–672.ChisholmCDWound evaluation and cleansingEmerg Med Clin North Am199210665 2. Edlich RF, Thacker JG. Wound irrigation. Ann Emerg Med 1994; 24: 88–90 (editorial).EdlichRF]]ThackerJGWound irrigationAnn Emerg Med19942488 3. Howell JM, Stair TO, Howell AW, Mundt DJ, Falcone A, Peters SR. The effect of scrubbing and irrigation with normal saline, povidone iodine, and cefazolin on wound bacterial counts in a guinea pig model. Am J Emerg Med 1993; 11: 134–138.HowellJM]]StairTO]]HowellAW]]MundtDJ]]FalconeA]]PetersSRThe effect of scrubbing and irrigation with normal saline, povidone iodine, and cefazolin on wound bacterial counts in a guinea pig modelAm J Emerg Med199311134 4. Dire DJ, Welsh AP. A comparison of wound irrigation solutions used in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1990; 19: 704–708.DireDJ]]WelshAPA comparison of wound irrigation solutions used in the emergency departmentAnn Emerg Med199019704 5. Moscati RM, Reardon RF, Lerner EB, Mayrose J. Wound irrigation with tap water. Acad Emerg Med 1998; 5: 1076–1080.MoscatiRM]]ReardonRF]]LernerEB]]MayroseJWound irrigation with tap waterAcad Emerg Med199851076 6. Ernst AA, Weiss SJ, Thomson T, Haynes ML. Warmed versus room temperature saline for ocular irrigation. Ann Emerg Med 1998; 32: 676–9.ErnstAA]]WeissSJ]]ThomsonT]]HaynesMLWarmed versus room temperature saline for ocular irrigationAnn Emerg Med199832676 7. Ernst AA, Takakuwa KM, Letner C, Weiss SJ. Warmed versus room temperature saline solution for ear irrigation: A randomized clinical trial. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 34: 347–350.ErnstAA]]TakakuwaKM]]LetnerC]]WeissSJWarmed versus room temperature saline solution for ear irrigation: A randomized clinical trialAnn Emerg Med199934347 8. Bainbridge LC. Comparison of room temperature and body temperature local anaesthetic solutions. Br J Plast Surg 1991; 44: 147–148.BainbridgeLCComparison of room temperature and body temperature local anaesthetic solutionsBr J Plast Surg199144147 9. White SJ, Slovis CM, Stephens S, Jones S. Effect of fluid temperature on patient comfort during intravenous rehydration. Ann Emerg Med 1996; 27: 144 (abstr).WhiteSJ]]SlovisCM]]StephensS]]JonesSEffect of fluid temperature on patient comfort during intravenous rehydrationAnn Emerg Med199627144 10. Werwath DL, Schwab CW, Scholten JR, Robinett W. Microwave ovens: A safe new method of warming crystalloids. Am Surg 1984; 50: 656–659.WerwathDL]]SchwabCW]]ScholtenJR]]RobinettWMicrowave ovens: A safe new method of warming crystalloidsAm Surg198450656 11. McGary WB, Ernst AA, Nick TG, Walker LA III. Normal saline vs lactated Ringer's solution for ocular irrigation. Acad Emerg Med 1998; 5: 371–372 (letter).McGaryWB]]ErnstAA]]NickTG]]WalkerLANormal saline vs lactated Ringer's solution for ocular irrigationAcad Emerg Med19985371 12. Bartfield JM, Gennis P, Barbera J, Breuer B, Gallagher EJ. Buffered versus plain lidocaine as a local anesthetic for simple laceration repair. Ann Emerg Med 1990; 19: 1387–1389.BartfieldJM]]GennisP]]BarberaJ]]BreuerB]]GallagherEJBuffered versus plain lidocaine as a local anesthetic for simple laceration repairAnn Emerg Med1990191387 13. Orlinsky M, Hudson C, Chan L, Deslauriers R. Pain comparison of unbuffered versus buffered lidocaine in local wound infiltration. J Emerg Med 1992; 10: 411–415.OrlinskyM]]HudsonC]]ChanL]]DeslauriersRPain comparison of unbuffered versus buffered lidocaine in local wound infiltrationJ Emerg Med199210411 14. Anglen J, Apostoles PS, Christensen G, Gainor B, Lane J. Removal of surface bacteria by irrigation. J Orthop Res 1996; 14: 251–254.AnglenJ]]ApostolesPS]]ChristensenG]]GainorB]]LaneJRemoval of surface bacteria by irrigationJ Orthop Res199614251 15. Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R. Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization: Study of Wound Infection and Temperature Group. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 1209–1215.KurzA]]SesslerDI]]LenhardtRPerioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization: Study of Wound Infection and Temperature GroupN Engl J Med19963341209 16. Moher D, Schulz, Altman D. The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA 2001; 285: 1987–1991.MoherD]]Schulz]]AltmanDThe CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trialsJAMA20012851987 &
