Original Article

What Attracts Medical Students to Primary Care? A Nominal Group Evaluation

Authors: Gustave Weiland, MD, Kathryn Cox, MS, Mary Katherine Sweeney, BS, Michael Belue, MA, Erin D. Snyder, MD, William D. Curry, MD, H. Hughes Evans, MD, PhD, B. Earl Salser, MD, Carlos A. Estrada, MD, MS

Abstract

Objective: To examine the perceptions of first-year medical students on their experiences in primary care.

Methods: Nominal group technique sessions were conducted with first-year medical students for 5 years. Questions were designed to evaluate primary care experiences and the role of primary care physicians. The questions explored what would make them consider primary care, what would detract from it, and what primary care has to offer that no other specialty can. Responses were weighted and ranked. The main outcome was the top five responses to three questions that were obtained at each session.

Results: Thirty-four students generated 280 responses to 3 questions. The top 5 responses for each year resulted in 29 experiences that strengthen enthusiasm: patient interactions (weighted sum, 43%), physician interactions/role modeling (22%), community interactions (20%), healthcare system/finances (8%), and other (6%). The top 5 responses resulted in 26 experiences that weaken enthusiasm, including hidden curriculum (45%), poor role models (29%), uncertainties about the healthcare system such as finances and documentation (20%), and patient interactions (6%). The top 5 responses regarding the uniqueness of primary care resulted in 37 experiences, including patient interactions (38%), continuity of care (20%), knowledge base (13%), community impact (10%), lifestyle benefits (10%), and education/prevention (9%).

Conclusions: Medical students highlighted unique relationships with patients and continuity of care as experiences that increase their enthusiasm for primary care. Negative experiences that weakened enthusiasm for primary care included hidden curriculum and poor role models. Programs that provide experiences in primary care can increase student interest in primary care careers.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. IHS Market. 2017 update. The complexities of physician supply and demand: projections from 2015 to 2030. https://aamc-black.global.ssl.fastly.net/production/media/filer_public/a5/c3/a5c3d565-14ec-48fb-974b-99fafaeecb00/aamc_projections_update_2017.pdf. Published February 28, 2017. Accessed November 17, 2018.
2. Durning SJ, Elnicki DM, Cruess DF, et al. Almost internists: analysis of students who considered internal medicine but chose other fields. Acad Med 2011;86:194-200.
3. Dorsey ER, Jarjoura D, Rutecki GW. Influence of controllable lifestyle on recent trends in specialty choice by US medical students. JAMA 2003;290:1173-1178.
4. West CP, Dupras DM. General medicine vs subspecialty career plans among internal medicine residents. JAMA 2012;308:2241-2247.
5. Garibaldi RA, Popkave C, Bylsma W. Career plans for trainees in internal medicine residency programs. Acad Med 2005;80:507-512.
6. Erikson CE, Danish S, Jones KC, et al. The role of medical school culture in primary care career choice. Acad Med 2013;88:1919-1926.
7. Sheline B, Tran AN, Jackson J, et al. The Primary Care Leadership Track at the Duke University School of Medicine: creating change agents to improve population health. Acad Med 2014;89:1370-1374.
8. Institute of Medicine. The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011.
9. Colquitt WL, Zeh MC, Killian CD, et al. Effect of debt on U.S. medical school graduates’ preferences for family medicine, general internal medicine, and general pediatrics. Acad Med 1996;71:399-411.
10. National Health Service Corps. Loan repayment and scholarships. https://nhsc.hrsa.gov. Accessed November 6, 2017.
11. Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine. Financial assistance programs. https://medschool.vcu.edu/studentaffairs/financial_aid/assistance. Accessed November 6, 2017.
12. University of Alabama School of Medicine. Dean’s Primary Care Scholars Program. https://www.uab.edu/medicine/home/future-students/admissions/primary-care-scholars-program. Accessed November 6, 2017.
13. Gallagher M, Hares T, Spencer J, et al. The nominal group technique: a research tool for general practice? Fam Pract 1993;10:76-81.
14. Long T, Chaiyachati K, Bosu O, et al. Why aren’t more primary care residents going into primary care? A qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med 2016;31:1452-1459.
15. Clinite KL, Reddy ST, Kazantsev SM, et al. Primary care, the ROAD less traveled: what first-year medical students want in a specialty. Acad Med 2013;88:1522-1528.
16. Selva Olid A, Zurro AM, Villa JJ, et al. Medical students’ perceptions and attitudes about family practice: a qualitative research synthesis. BMC Med Educ 2012;12:81.
17. Hafferty FW. Beyond curriculum reform: confronting medicine’s hidden curriculum. Acad Med 1998;73:403-407.
18. Phillips JP, Weismantel DP, Gold KJ, et al. Medical student debt and primary care specialty intentions. Fam Med 2010;42:616-622.
19. Bodenheimer T, Pham HH. Primary care: current problems and proposed solutions. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:799-805.
20. Tolhurst H, Stewart M. Becoming a GP-a qualitative study of the career interests of medical students. Aust Fam Physician 2005;34:204-206.
21. Mutha S, Takayama JI, O’Neil EH. Insights into medical students’ career choices based on third- and fourth-year students’ focus-group discussions. Acad Med 1997;72:635-640.