Abstract
Background:In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL), the value of the 12-lead surface electrocardiogram (ECG) in predicting direct current cardioversion (DCCV) outcomes has not been thoroughly investigated. We sought to determine whether the type of atrial arrhythmia (AF versus AFL) and the characteristics of the atrial fibrillatory waves (fine versus coarse) on the surface ECG would help predict post DCCV outcomes.Methods:A total of 76 consecutive patients undergoing elective DCCV for persistent AF or AFL at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center were included in this retrospective cohort study. All patients had ECGs immediately and one month after DCCV.Results:Mean age was 67 ± 8 years and 97% of the participants were male. DCCV was immediately successful in 64 (84%) patients. Of these, 35 (46%) remained in sinus rhythm at one month. DCCV was immediately successful in all patients (N = 13) with fine AF versus 34/45 of those with coarse AF (P = 0.05). Patients with fine AF were also more likely to remain in sinus rhythm at one-month follow up compared to those with coarse AF (8/13 versus 13/45; P = 0.03). Also, at one-month follow up, the patients with AFL were more likely to maintain sinus rhythm than those with AF (14/18 of AFL versus 21/58 of AF; P = 0.003).Conclusion:The characteristics of the fibrillatory waves on surface ECG should be utilized to determine the success after DCCV in patients with AF and AFL.
This content is limited to qualifying members.
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
References
References1.European Heart Rhythm Association; Heart Rhythm Society; Fuster V, Rydén LE, Cannom DS, et al; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines; Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation—executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation). J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:854–906.2.Miyasaka Y, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, et al. Secular trends in incidence of atrial fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and implications on the projections for future prevalence. Circulation 2006;114:119–125.MiyasakaY]]BarnesME]]GershBJ&etal;Secular trends in incidence of atrial fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and implications on the projections for future prevalence.Circulation2006114119-1253.Falk RH. Atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1067–1078.FalkRHAtrial fibrillation.N Engl J Med20013441067-10784.Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, D’Agostino RB, et al. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 1998;98:946–952.BenjaminEJ]]WolfPA]]D’AgostinoRB&etal;Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framingham Heart Study.Circulation199898946-9525.Van Gelder IC, Crijns HJ, Van Gilst WH, et al. Prediction of uneventful cardioversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm from direct-current electrical cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation and flutter. Am J Cardiol 1991;68:41–46.Van GelderIC]]CrijnsHJ]]Van GilstWH&etal;Prediction of uneventful cardioversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm from direct-current electrical cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation and flutter.Am J Cardiol19916841-466.Berry C, Stewart S, Payne EM, et al. Electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: outcomes in “real-life” clinical practice. Int J Cardiol 2001;81:29–35.BerryC]]StewartS]]PayneEM&etal;Electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: outcomes in “real-life” clinical practice.Int J Cardiol20018129-357.Holmqvist F, Stridh M, Waktare JE, et al. Atrial fibrillatory rate and sinus rhythm maintenance in patients undergoing cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2006;27:2201–2207.HolmqvistF]]StridhM]]WaktareJE&etal;Atrial fibrillatory rate and sinus rhythm maintenance in patients undergoing cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation.Eur Heart J2006272201-22078.Frick M, Frykman V, Jensen-Urstad M, et al. Factors predicting success rate and recurrence of atrial fibrillation after first electrical cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Clin Cardiol 2001;24:238–244.FrickM]]FrykmanV]]Jensen-UrstadM&etal;Factors predicting success rate and recurrence of atrial fibrillation after first electrical cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.Clin Cardiol200124238-2449.Paraskevaidis IA, Dodouras T, Tsiapras D, et al. Prediction of successful cardioversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with lone atrial fibrillation. Chest 2005;127:488–494.ParaskevaidisIA]]DodourasT]]TsiaprasD&etal;Prediction of successful cardioversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with lone atrial fibrillation.Chest2005127488-49410.Peter RH, Morris JJ Jr, McIntosh HD. Relationship of fibrillatory waves and P waves in the electrocardiogram. Circulation 1966;33:599–606.PeterRH]]MorrisJJJr]]McIntoshHDRelationship of fibrillatory waves and P waves in the electrocardiogram.Circulation196633599-60611.Elesber AA, Rosales AG, Herges RM, et al. Relapse and mortality following cardioversion of new-onset vs. recurrent atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in the elderly. Eur Heart J 2006;27:854–860.ElesberAA]]RosalesAG]]HergesRM&etal;Relapse and mortality following cardioversion of new-onset vs. recurrent atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in the elderly.Eur Heart J200627854-86012.Blomström-Lundqvist C, Scheinman MM, Aliot EM, et al; European Society of Cardiology Committee, NASPE-Heart Rhythm Society. ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias—executive summary. A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines and the European society of cardiology committee for practice guidelines (writing committee to develop guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias) developed in collaboration with NASPE-Heart Rhythm Society J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1493–1531.Blomström-LundqvistC]]ScheinmanMM]]AliotEM&etal;European Society of Cardiology CommitteeNASPE-Heart Rhythm SocietyACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias—executive summary. A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines and the European society of cardiology committee for practice guidelines (writing committee to develop guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias) developed in collaboration with NASPE-Heart Rhythm SocietyJ Am Coll Cardiol2003421493-153113.Aysha MH, Hassan AS. Diagnostic importance of fibrillatory wave amplitude: a clue to echocardiographic left atrial size and etiology of atrial fibrillation. J Electrocardiol 1988;21:247–251.AyshaMH]]HassanASDiagnostic importance of fibrillatory wave amplitude: a clue to echocardiographic left atrial size and etiology of atrial fibrillation.J Electrocardiol198821247-25114.Blackshear JL, Safford RE, Pearce LA. F-amplitude, left atrial appendage velocity, and thromboembolic risk in nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation investigators. Clin Cardiol 1996;19:309–313.BlackshearJL]]SaffordRE]]PearceLAF-amplitude, left atrial appendage velocity, and thromboembolic risk in nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation investigators.Clin Cardiol199619309-31315.Li YH, Hwang JJ, Tseng YZ, et al. Clinical significance of fibrillatory wave amplitude. A clue to left atrial appendage function in nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. Chest 1995;108:359–363.LiYH]]HwangJJ]]TsengYZ&etal;Clinical significance of fibrillatory wave amplitude. A clue to left atrial appendage function in nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation.Chest1995108359-36316.Brearley WD Jr, Taylor L III, Littmann L. Acute myocardial infarction with precordial ST segment elevation: where is the culprit? Heart Lung 2006;35:427–429.BrearleyWDJr]]TaylorLIII]]LittmannLAcute myocardial infarction with precordial ST segment elevation: where is the culprit?Heart Lung200635427-429
