Original Article

Patient Satisfaction with Bedside Teaching Rounds Compared with Nonbedside Rounds

Authors: Jason Ramirez, MD, Jason Singh, MD, Adrienne A. Williams, PhD

Abstract

Objectives: Many barriers have been cited in reference to why bedside teaching rounds have decreased in frequency during graduate medical education. One perceived barrier to the use of bedside teaching rounds is a fear of it causing patient discomfort or dissatisfaction. The objective of this study was to compare patient perception of bedside versus nonbedside teaching rounds.

Methods: Study participants were adults admitted to a family medicine inpatient team at a large university teaching hospital. Upon admission, participants were randomized to receive bedside or nonbedside teaching rounds conducted by a team consisting of medical students, family medicine residents, and one attending physician. Each participant completed a questionnaire administered on the day of discharge assessing patients’ perception of their involvement in medical decision making, trust in the medical team, satisfaction with care, and provider compassion. Statistical analysis was performed to examine any differences between the two groups.

Results: The vast majority of the sample indicated that they knew what they were being treated for in the hospital (n = 105, 98%), reported the medical team spent an adequate amount of time with them (n = 100, 94%), and reported the medical team explained the diagnosis and care in easy-to-understand terms (n = 101, 94%). On 1- to 5-point scales, participants reported that the medical team involved them in making decisions (4.62, standard deviation [SD] 0.72), they trusted the medical team (4.91, SD 0.32), they were satisfied with their care (4.85, SD 0.38), and their medical team was compassionate toward them (4.84, SD 0.44). Overall levels of satisfaction were positive on all of the measures, with no statistical significance between the two groups regarding measures of involvement in medical decision making, trust in the medical team, and satisfaction with care. Interestingly, subjects perceived level of compassion of their medical team to be significantly higher with a bedside teaching approach compared with a nonbedside approach.

Conclusions: Despite concerns that bedside teaching rounds may lead to patient discomfort, this study found no evidence supporting this perception. In fact, patients may perceive a medical team that engages in bedside teaching rounds as being more compassionate providers, supporting a patient-centered argument that teaching rounds should return to the bedside.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Thayer WS. Osler, the teacher. Johns Hopkins Hosp Bull 1919;30:178.
 
2. Shankel SW, Mazzaferri EL. Teaching the resident in internal medicine. Present practices and suggestions for the future. JAMA 1986;256:725-729.
 
3. Ramani S, Orlander JD, Strunin L, et al. Whither bedside teaching? A focus-group study of clinical teachers. Acad Med 2003;78:384-390.
 
4. The William Osler Papers. ‘‘Father of Modern Medicine’’: The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine 1889-1905. https://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/ps/retrieve/Narrative/GF/p-nid/363. Accessed December 31, 2015.
 
5. Gonzalo JD, Heist BS, Duffy BL, et al. The value of bedside rounds: a multicenter qualitative study. Teach Learn Med 2013;25:326-333.
 
6. Linfors EW, Neelon FA. Sounding boards. The case of bedside rounds. N Engl J Med 1980;303:1230-1233.
 
7. Gonzalo JD, Masters PA, Simons RJ, et al. Attending rounds and bedside case presentations: medical student and medicine resident experiences and attitudes. Teach Learn Med 2009;21:105-110.
 
8. Gonzalo JD, Heist BS, Duffy BL, et al. Identifying and overcoming the barriers to bedside rounds: a multicenter qualitative study. Acad Med 2014;89:326-334.
 
9. Romano J. Patient’s attitudes and behavior in ward round teaching. JAMA 1941;117:664-667.
 
10. Simons RJ, Baily RG, Zelis R, et al. The physiologic and psychological effects of the bedside presentation. N Engl J Med 1989;321:1273-1275.
 
11. Lehmann LS, Brancati FL, Chen MC, et al. The effect of bedside case presentations on patients’ perceptions of their medical care. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1150-1155.
 
12. Majdan JF, Berg KT, Schultz KL, et al. Patient perceptions of bedside teaching rounds. Med Educ 2013;47:1124-1125.