Case Report
Removal of Vena Caval Filter at 224 Days
Abstract
Patients at risk of pulmonary embolism usually receive anticoagulants, which are contraindicated in trauma victims. A woman with extensive deep venous thrombosis after a vehicle accident had a nitinol Recovery Filter inserted prophylactically. After her recovery, she requested filter removal because of her intention to become pregnant. The filter was removed percutaneously without difficulty 224 days after implantation.
Key Points
* Prophylactic placement of a vena caval filter in patients at high risk of pulmonary embolism has been controversial.
* Certain optional vena caval filters may remain in place safely for extended periods.
* The benefit of inferior vena cava filtration with a removable filter is a significant step in the prevention of pulmonary embolism.
This content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($25)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.