The Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) is the official, peer-reviewed journal of the Southern Medical Association. It has a multidisciplinary and inter-professional focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists.
SMJ // Article
Editorial
The Problem with Parsimony (and the Prioritization of Prudence)
Abstract
Estimates suggest that nearly one-third of total healthcare expenditures can be attributed to nonbeneficial practices.1 In response, ethical debate about the physician’s role in cost containment has shifted from the allocation of scarce resources to the avoidance of waste.2 This evolution underscores the crucial distinction between eschewing unnecessary tests and treatments because doing so is best for individual patients versus the collateral benefit of increasing access to healthcare services that may ensue from eliminating waste. To the extent that “parsimonious medicine” is driven by the goal of improving patient outcomes and reducing iatrogenic complications, its ethical foundations rest upon the core tenets of professionalism (beneficence and nonmaleficence), as opposed to notions of distributive justice associated with rationing.3This content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($25)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.
