Original Article

Family Medicine–Specific Practice-Based Research Network Productivity and Clinical and Translational Sciences Award Program Affiliation

Authors: Treah Haggerty, MD, MS, Allison M. Cole, MD, MPH, Jun Xiang, MS, Arch G. Mainous, PhD, Dean Seehusen, MD, MPH

Abstract

Objective: Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) are groups of practices that work together to conduct research. Little is known about the degree to which PBRNs may be achieving success. This is the first general survey of family medicine–based PBRN directors in the United States and Canada to examine research productivity outcomes of PBRNs and explore the association between Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) program affiliation and PBRN outcomes.

Methods: The Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance conducted the survey and e-mailed it to 102 PBRN directors from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s registration.

Results: A total of 54 (56%) PBRN directors responded to the survey. PBRNs with an affiliation with a CTSA program were more likely to report completion of quality improvement research and participation in multiple PBRN collaboration research projects. PBRNs affiliated with CTSA programs were less likely to report maintaining funding as a significant barrier.

Conclusions: CTSA involvement with PBRNs results in family physician scientists’ completing research and disseminating this research through publication. Also, PBRNs with CTSA partnerships have more funding availability. PBRN partnership with a CTSA is beneficial in furthering research in family medicine.

 

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Westfall JM, Mold J, Fagnan L. Practice-based research-- "Blue Highways" on the NIH roadmap. JAMA 2007;297:403-406.
 
2. Nutting PA, Beasley JW, Werner JJ. Practice-based research networks answer primary care questions. JAMA 1999;281:686-688.
 
3. Lindbloom EJ, Ewigman BG, Hickner JM. Practice-based research networks: the laboratories of primary care research. Med Care 2004;42(4 Suppl):III45-III49.
 
4. Cole A, Keppel GA, Linares A, et al. Evaluating the development, implementation and dissemination of a multisite card study in the WWAMI Region Practice and Research Network. Clin Transl Sci 2015;8:764-769.
 
5. Mold JW, Peterson KA. Primary care practice-based research networks: working at the interface between research and quality improvement. Ann Fam Med 2005;3(Suppl 1):S12-S20.
 
6. Peterson KA, Lipman PD, Lange CJ, et al. Supporting better science in primary care: a description of practice-based research networks (PBRNs) in 2011. J Am Board Fam Med 2012;25:565-571.
 
7. Tierney WM, Oppenheimer CC, Hudson BL, et al. A national survey of primary care practice-based research networks. Ann Fam Med 2007;5:242-250.
 
8. Zerhouni EA, Alving B. Clinical and translational science awards: a framework for a national research agenda. Transl Res 2006;148:4-5.
 
9. Fagnan LJ, Davis M, Deyo RA, et al. Linking practice-based research networks and Clinical and Translational Science Awards: new opportunities for community engagement by academic health centers. Acad Med 2010;85:476-483.
 
10. Peterson LE, Jaén CR, Phillips RL. Family physician participation in quality improvement. J Am Board Fam Med 2013;26:626-627.