Original Article
Hospital Discharge Disposition of Stroke Patients in Tennessee
Abstract
Objectives: Early determination of hospital discharge disposition status at an acute admission is extremely important for stroke management and the eventual outcomes of patients with stroke. We investigated the hospital discharge disposition of patients with stroke residing in Tennessee and developed a predictive tool for clinical adoption. Our investigational aims were to evaluate the association of selected patient characteristics with hospital discharge disposition status and predict such status at the time of an acute stroke admission.Methods: We analyzed 127,581 records of patients with stroke hospitalized between 2010 and 2014. Logistic regression was used to generate odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals to examine the factor outcome association. An easy-to-use clinical predictive tool was built by using integer-based risk scores derived from coefficients of multivariable logistic regression.
Results: Among the 127,581 records of patients with stroke, 86,114 (67.5%) indicated home discharge and 41,467 (32.5%) corresponded to facility discharge. All considered patient characteristics had significant correlations with hospital discharge disposition status. Patients were at greater odds of being discharged to another facility if they were women; older; black; patients with a subarachnoid or intracerebral hemorrhage; those with the comorbidities of diabetes mellitus, heart disease, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, arrhythmia, or depression; those transferred from another hospital; or patients with Medicare as the primary payer. A predictive tool had a discriminatory capability with area under the curve estimates of 0.737 and 0.724 for derivation and validation cohorts, respectively.
Conclusions: Our investigation revealed that the hospital discharge disposition pattern of patients with stroke in Tennessee was associated with the key patient characteristics of selected demographics, clinical indicators, and insurance status. These analyses resulted in the development of an easy-to-use predictive tool for early determination of hospital discharge disposition status.
This content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($25)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.
References
1. Clark ML, Gropen T. Advances in the stroke system of care. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2015;17:355.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Stroke facts. http://www.cdc.gov/stroke/facts.htm. Accessed October 12, 2016.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of stroke-United States, 2006-2010. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6120a5.htm. Published May 25, 2012. Accessed February 23, 2017.
4. East Tennessee State University College of Public Health, the Tennessee Department of Health, and the American Heart/American Stroke Association. Tennessee stroke registry report, 2014. https://www.etsu.edu/cph/biostat_epidemiology/documents/tsr_report_2014.pdf. Accessed June 27, 2017.
5. Chan L, Sandel ME, Jette AM, et al. Does postacute care site matter? A longitudinal study assessing functional recovery after a stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013;94:622-629.
6. Luker JA, Bernhardt J, Grimmer KA, et al. A qualitative exploration of discharge destination as an outcome or a driver of acute stroke care. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14:193.
7. Nguyen TA, Page A, Aggarwal A, et al. Social determinants of discharge destination for patients after stroke with low admission FIM instrument scores. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:740-744.
8. Kind AJ, Smith MA, Liou JI, et al. Discharge destination’ effect on bounce-back risk in black, white, and Hispanic acute ischemic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:189-195.
9. Freburger JK, Holmes GM, Ku LJ, et al. Disparities in postacute rehabilitation care for stroke: an analysis of the state inpatient databases. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92:1220-1229.
10. Bejot Y, Troisgros O, Gremeaux V, et al. Poststroke disposition and associated factors in a population-based study: the Dijon Stroke Registry. Stroke 2012;43:2071-2077.
11. Jaja BN, Saposnik G, Nisenbaum R, et al. Racial/ethnic differences in inpatient mortality and use of institutional postacute care following subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 2013;119:1627-1632.
12. Xian Y, Holloway RG, Smith EE, et al. Racial/ethnic differences in process of care and outcomes among patients hospitalized with intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 2014;45:3243-3250.
13. Van der Cruyssen K, Vereeck L, Saeys W, et al. Prognostic factors for discharge destination after acute stroke: a comprehensive literature review. Disabil Rehabil 2015;37:1214-1227.
14. Tseng HP, Lin FJ, Chen PT, et al. Derivation and validation of a discharge disposition predicting model after acute stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2015;24:1179-1186.
15. Nguyen VQ, PrvuBettger J, Guerrier T, et al. Factors associated with discharge to home versus discharge to institutional care after inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2015;96:1297-1303.
16. Bell CL, LaCroix AZ, Desai M, et al. Factors associated with nursing home admission after stroke in older women. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2015;24:2329-2337.
17. Dutrieux RD, van Eijk M, van Mierlo ML, et al. Discharge home after acute stroke: differences between older and younger patients. J Rehabil Med 2016;48:14-18.
18. Mees M, Klein J, Yperzeele L, et al. Predicting discharge destination after stroke: a systematic review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2016;142:15-21.
19. Stein J, Bettger JP, Sicklick A, et al. Use of a standardized assessment to predict rehabilitation care after acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2015;96:210-217.
20. Hospital Discharge Data System User Manual. Chattanooga:Tennessee Department of Health , 2011.
21. Sullivan LM, Massaro JM, D'Agostino RB. Presentation of multivariate data for clinical use: the Framingham Study risk score functions. Stat Med 2004;23:1631-1660.
22. Wu C, Hannan EL, Walford G, et al. A risk score to predict in-hospital mortality for percutaneous coronary interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:654-660.
23. Kelly-Hayes M, Wolf P, Kannel W, et al. Factors influencing survival and need for institutionalization following stroke: the Framingham Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988;69:415-418.
24. de Pablo P, Losina E, Phillips CB, et al. Determinants of discharge destination following elective total hip replacement. Arthritis Rheum 2004;51:1009-1017.
25. Osborne J, Langefeld CD, Moomaw CJ, et al. Abstract ns20: discharge disposition after intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 2015;46:ANS20.
26. Wang SY, Zhao Y, Zang XY. Continuing care for older patients during the transitional period. Chin Nurs Res 2014;1:5-13.
27. Andersen KK, Olsen TS, Dehlendorff C, et al. Hemorrhagic and ischemic strokes compared: stroke severity, mortality, and risk factors. Stroke 2009;40:2068-2072.
28. Bettger JP, Zhao X, Bushnell C, et al. The association between socioeconomic status and disability after stroke: findings from the Adherence eValuation After Ischemic stroke Longitudinal (AVAIL) registry. BMC Public Health 2014;14:281.
29. Stineman MG, Kwong PL, Bates BE, et al. Development and validation of a discharge planning index for achieving home discharge after hospitalization for acute stroke among those who received rehabilitation services. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2014;93:217-230.
30. El Husseini N, Fonarow GC, Smith EE, et al. Renal dysfunction is associated with poststroke discharge disposition and in-hospital mortality: findings from Get With The Guidelines-Stroke. Stroke 2017;48:327-334.
31. Tennessee Department of Health. High blood pressure facts. https://www.tn.gov/assets/entities/health/attachments/HBP.pdf. Accessed February 23, 2017.
32. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Hypertension among adults in the United States: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011-2012. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db133.htm. Published October 2013. Accessed February 23, 2017.
33. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital signs: avoidable deaths from heart disease, stroke, and hypertensive disease-United States, 2001-2010. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6235a4.htm. Published September 6, 2013. Accessed June 27, 2017.
34. Ouellette DS, Timple C, Kaplan SE, et al. Predicting discharge destination with admission outcome scores in stroke patients. NeuroRehabilitation 2015;37:173-179.
35. Fox MT, Persaud M, Maimets I, et al. Effectiveness of early discharge planning in acutely ill or injured hospitalized older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr 2013;13:70.
36. Beech R, Rudd AG, Tilling K, et al. Economic consequences of early inpatient discharge to community-based rehabilitation for stroke in an inner-London teaching hospital. Stroke 1999;30:729-735.
37. Mas MÀ, Inzitari M. A critical review of Early Supported Discharge for stroke patients: from evidence to implementation into practice. Int J Stroke 2015;10:7-12.
38. Meyer MJ, Pereira S, McClure A, et al. A systematic review of studies reporting multivariable models to predict functional outcomes after post-stroke inpatient rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2015;37:1316-1323.
39. Bettger JP, Thomas L, Liang L, et al. Hospital variation in functional recovery after stroke. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2017;10. pii: e002391.
