Original Article

Improving Documentation of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIS) Using a Standardized Electronic Template at Two University-Affiliated Institutions

Authors: Padraic Chisholm, MD, Allison Sellner, , Charles C. Kilpatrick, MD, MEd, Laurie S. Swaim, MD, Francisco J. Orejuela, MD, MS

Abstract

Objectives: Adequate repair is vital to reduce the long-term sequelae of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). Sufficient documentation is necessary to reflect the quality of care provided, to guide future management, and to reduce medicolegal liability. With the advent of electronic health records, proper methods of documentation can be more easily disseminated and applied for general use. The objectives of our study were to assess whether documentation of OASIS management is improved by introducing a standardized electronic operative report, determining rates of readmission due to complications, and measuring adherence to practice guidelines.

Methods: A pre- and postintervention study was conducted by auditing electronic charts of patients affected by OASIS at two university-affiliated delivery units throughout the 2016 calendar year. Unit A is a safety-net hospital and unit B is private. A standardized electronic template was created in the electronic health records of both units. The primary outcome was the quality of repair documentation, which was quantified using a scale that included all relevant aspects of the repair.

Results: Analyzing both units separately, baseline characteristics including operator training level, episiotomy rate, and operative delivery were similar pre- and postintervention. The quality of documentation measured by the scale score improved significantly postintervention. Proper use of antibiotics and bowel regimen significantly increased after the intervention at both units.

Conclusions: The use of a standardized electronic template for reporting the diagnosis and repair of OASIS improves the thoroughness of documentation and appears to promote the implementation of best practice guidelines.
Posted in: Obstetrics and Gynecology70

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Tung CW, Cheon WC, Tong WM, et al. Incidence and risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injuries after various modes of vaginal deliveries in Chinese women. Chin Med J (Eng) 2015;128:2420-2425.
2. Ampt AJ, Patterson JA, Roberts CL, et al. Obstetric anal sphincter injury rates among primiparous women with different modes of vaginal delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015;131:260-264.
3. Lewicky-Gaupp C, Leader-Cramer A, Johnson LL, et al. Wound complications after obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125:1088-1093.
4. Richter HE, Nager CW, Whitworth R, et al. Incidence and predictors of anal incontinence after obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2015;21:182-189.
5. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The management of third- and fourth-degree perineal tears. Green-top Guideline no. 29. https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg-29.pdf. Published June 2015. Accessed December 11, 2018.
6. Poulsen MØ, Madsen ML, Skriver-Mø AC, et al. Does the Finnish intervention prevent obstetric anal sphincter injuries? A systematic review of the literature. BMJ Open 2015;5:e008346.
7. Sultan AH, Thakar R, Fenner DE , eds. Perineal and Anal Sphincter Trauma: Diagnosis and Clinical Management. London:Springer-Verlag; 2009.
8. Moragianni VA, Hacker MR, Craparo FJ. Improved overall delivery documentation following implementation of a standardized shoulder dystocia delivery form. J Perinat Med 2011;40:97-100.
9. Panigrahy R, Welsh J, MacKenzie F, et al. A complete audit cycle of management of third/fourth degree perineal tears. J Obstet Gynaecol 2008;28:305-309.
10. Cawich SO, Kulkarni S, Ramdass M, et al. An audit of clinician compliance with best practice recommendations to repair severe obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Perm J 2014;18:27-31.
11. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin no. 165: prevention and management of obstetric lacerations at vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128:e1-e15.
12. Mehta R, Radhakrishnan NS, Warring CD, et al. The use of evidence-based, problem-oriented templates as a clinical decision support in an inpatient electronic health record system. Appl Clin Inform 2016;7:790-802.
13. Parrish AB, Sanaiha Y, Petrie BA, et al. Examining the quality of rectal cancer operative reports in teaching institutions: is there an opportunity for resident education? Am Surg 2016;82:1023-1027.
14. Kanegaye JT, Cheng C, McCaslin RI, et al. Improved documentation of wound care with a structured encounter form in the pediatric emergency department. Ambul Pediatr 2005;5:253-257.