References
1. Lu KH, Dinh M, Kohlmann W, et al. Gynecologic cancer as a “sentinel cancer” for women with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:569-574.
2. Lynch HT, Lynch JF. Lynch syndrome: history and current status. Dis Markers 2004;20:181-198.
3. Necochea R. From cancer families to HNPCC: Henry Lynch and the transformations of hereditary cancer, 1975-1999. Bull Hist Med 2007;81:267-285.
4. Lynch HT, Shaw MW, Magnuson CW, et al. Hereditary factors in cancer: study of two large Midwestern kindreds. Arch Intern Med 1966;117:206-212.
5. Seiden MV, Patel D, O’ MJ, et al. Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Case 13-2007. A 46-year-old woman with gynecologic and intestinal cancers. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1760-1769.
6. Palomaki GE, McClain MR, Melillo S, et al. EGAPP supplementary evidence review: DNA testing strategies aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality from Lynch syndrome. Genet Med 2009;11:42-65.
7. Koessler T, Oestergaard MZ, Song H, et al. Common variants in mismatch repair genes and risk of colorectal cancer. Gut 2008;57:1097-1101.
8. Turnpenny P, Ellard S. Emery’s Elements of Medical Genetics. 12th ed. New York:Elsevier;2005.
9. de la Chapelle A. Microsatellite instability. N Engl J Med 2003;349:209-210.
10. Vasen HF, Mecklin JP, Khan PM, et al. The international collaborative group on hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (IGC-HNPCC). Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:424-425.
11. Lipton LR, Johnson V, Cummings C, et al. Refining the Amsterdam criteria and Bethesda guidelines: testing algorithms for the prediction of mismatch repair mutation status in the familial cancer clinic. J Clin Oncol 2004;22: 4934-4943.
12. Syngal S, Fox EA, Eng C, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of clinical criteria for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer associated mutations in MSH2 and MLH1. J Med Genet 2000;9:641-645.
13. Vasen HF, Watson P, Mecklin JP, et al. New clinical criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC, Lynch syndrome) proposed by the International Collaborative Group on HNPCC. Gastroenterology 1999;116:1453-1456.
14. Umar A, Boland CR, Terdiman JP, et al. Revised Bethesda guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:261-268.
15. Barnetson RA, Tenesa A, Farrington SM, et al. Identification and survival of carriers of mutations in DNA mismatch-repair genes in colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2751-2763.
16. Green RC, Parfrey PS, Woods MO, et al. Prediction of Lynch syndrome in consecutive patients with colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009;101: 331-340.
17. Chen S, Wang W, Lee S, et al. Prediction of germline mutations and cancer risk in the Lynch syndrome. JAMA 2006;296:1479-1487.
18. Kastrinos F, Steyerberg EW, Mercado R, et al. The PREMM(1,2,6) model predicts risk of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 germline mutations based on cancer history. Gastroenterology 2011;140:73-81.
19. Giardiello FM, Allen JI, Axilbund JE, et al. Guidelines on genetic evaluation and management of Lynch syndrome: a consensus statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2014;57:1025-1048.
20. McConechy MK, Talhouk A, Li-Chang HH, et al. Detection of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiencies by immunohistochemistry can effectively diagnose the microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype in endometrial carcinomas. Gynecol Oncol 2015;137:306-310.
21. Lancaster JM, Powell CB, Kauff ND, et al. Society of Gynecologic Oncologists Education Committee statement on risk assessment for inherited gynecologic cancer predispositions. Gynecol Oncol 2007;107:159-162.
22. Hendriks YM, Wagner A, Morreau H, et al. Cancer risk in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer due to MSH6 mutations: impact on counseling and surveillance. Gastroenterology 2004;127:17-25.
23. Dunlop MG, Farrington SM, Carothers AD, et al. Cancer risk associated with germline DNA mismatch repair gene mutations. Hum Mol Genet 1997;6:105-110.
24. Wang Y, Wang Y, Li J, et al. Lynch syndrome related endometrial cancer: clinical significance beyond the endometrium. J Hematol Oncol 2013;6:22.
25. Lu KH, Schorge JO, Rodabaugh KJ, et al. Prospective determination of prevalence of Lynch syndrome in young women with endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:5158-5164.
26. Broaddus RR, Lynch HT, Chen LM, et al. Pathologic features of endometrial carcinoma associated with HNPCC: a comparison with sporadic endometrial carcinoma. Cancer 2006;106:87-94.
27. Westin SN, Lacour RA, Urbauer DL, et al. Carcinoma of the lower uterine segment: a newly described association with Lynch syndrome. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:5965-5971.
29. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology, Society of Gynecologic Oncology. ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 147: Lynch syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 2014;124:1042-1054.
30. Lu KH, Loose DS, Yates MS, et al. Prospective multicenter randomized intermediate biomarker study of oral contraceptive versus depo-provera for prevention of endometrial cancer in women with Lynch syndrome. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2013;6:774-781.
31. Schmeler KM, Lynch HT, Chen LM, et al. Prophylactic surgery to reduce the risk of gynecologic cancers in the Lynch syndrome. N Engl J Med 2006;354: 261-269.
32. Bast RC, Xu FJ, Yu YH, et al. CA 125: the past and the future. Int J Biol Markers 1998;13:179-187.
33. Powell JL, Hill KA, Shiro BC, et al. Preoperative serum CA-125 levels in treating endometrial cancer. J Reprod Med 2005;50:585-590.
34. Yildiz A, Yetimalar H, Kasap B, et al. Preoperative serum CA 125 level in the prediction of the stage of disease in endometrial carcinoma. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012;164:191-195.
35. Dotters DJ, Preoperative CA. 125 in endometrial cancer: is it useful? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:1328-1334.
36. Jiang T, Huang L, Zhang S. Preoperative serum CA125: a useful marker for surgical management of endometrial cancer. BMC Cancer 2015;15:396.