Original Article

What Defines an Honors Student? Survey of Pediatric and Internal Medicine Faculty Perspectives

Authors: Erinn O. Schmit, MD, Chang L. Wu, MD, Ryan B. Khodadadi, MD, L. Nicholas Herrera, MD, Winter L. Williams, MD, Carlos A. Estrada, MD, MS

Abstract

Objective: Although considerable emphasis is placed on the attainment of honors in core medical school clerkships, little is known about what student characteristics are used by attending physicians to earn this designation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate what values and characteristics that attending physicians consider important in the evaluation of Pediatrics and Internal Medicine clerkship students for clinical honors designation.

Methods: This cross-sectional survey study was framed around Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competencies. It was administered at three tertiary care hospitals associated with one large medical school in an urban setting. Teaching ward attendings in Pediatrics and Internal Medicine who evaluated third-year medical students between 2013 and 2016 were surveyed.

Results: Overall, Pediatric and Internal Medicine faculty demonstrated close agreement in which competencies were most important in designating clinical honors. Both groups believed that professionalism was the most important factor and that systems-based practice and patient care were among the least important factors. The only competency with a significant difference between the two groups was systems-based practice, with Internal Medicine placing more emphasis on the coordination of patient care and understanding social determinants of health.

Conclusions: Professionalism, communication skills, and medical knowledge are the most important characteristics when determining clinical honors on Pediatrics and Internal Medicine clerkships.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Education Liason Committee on Medical Education. Functions and structure of a medical school: standards for accreditation of medical education programs leading to the MD degree. http://www.lcme.org/publications/#Standards. Published 2016. Accessed June 27, 2017.
2. Chandler M, Engle K, Hunt AM. Guidebook for Undergraduate Medical Education Administration. 2014. Available at: http://www.im.org/d/do/4495. Accessed June 27, 2017.
3. Alexander EK, Osman NY, Walling JL, et al. Variation and imprecision of clerkship grading in U.S. medical schools. Acad Med 2012;87:1070-1076.
4. Takayama H, Grinsell R, Brock D, et al. Is it appropriate to use core clerkship grades in the selection of residents? Curr Surg 2006;63:391-396.
5. Fazio SB, Papp KK, Torre DM, et al. Grade inflation in the internal medicine clerkship: a national survey. Teach Learn Med 2013;25:71-76.
6. White CB, Waller JL, Freed G, et al. The state of undergraduate pediatric medical education in North America: the COMSEP survey. Teach Learn Med 2007;19:264-270.
7. Kassebaum DG, Eaglen RH. Shortcomings in the evaluation of students' clinical skills and behaviors in medical school. Acad Med 1999;74:842-849.
8. Green M, Jones P, Thomas JX, Jr. Selection criteria for residency: results of a national program directors survey. Acad Med 2009;84:362-367.
9. Dudas RA, Barone MA. Setting standards to determine core clerkship grades in pediatrics. Acad Pediatr 2014;14:294-300.
10. Lipman JM, Schenarts KD. Defining honors in the surgery clerkship. J Am Coll Surg 2016;223:665-669.
11. Torres MB, Cochran A. Accuracy and content of medical student midclerkship self-evaluations. Am J Surg 2016;211:1153-1157.
12. Harfmann KL, Zirwas MJ. Can performance in medical school predict performance in residency? A compilation and review of correlative studies. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011;65:1010-1022.e2.
13. Rosenbluth G, O'Brien B, Asher EM, et al. The"zing factor"--how do faculty describe the best pediatrics residents? J Grad Med Educ 2014;6:106-111.
14. Goldie J, Dowie A, Goldie A, et al. What makes a good clinical student and teacher? An exploratory study. BMC Med Educ 2015;15:40.
15. Wang KE, Fitzpatrick C, George D, et al. Attitudes of affiliate faculty members toward medical student summative evaluation for clinical clerkships: a qualitative analysis. Teach Learn Med 2012;24:8-17.
16. Alexander EK, Osman NY, Walling JL, et al. A standardized approach to grading clerkships: hard to achieve and not worth it anyway. Acad Med 2013;88:296.
17. Catalanotti JS, Andolsek KM, Berger JS. The AAMC Medical Student Performance Evaluation Task Force Recommendations: do they go far enough? J Grad Med Educ 2017;9:1-4.
18. Durning SJ, Hemmer PA. Commentary: grading: what is it good for? Acad Med 2012;87:1002-1004.
19. Cacamese SM, Elnicki M, Speer AJ. Grade inflation and the internal medicine subinternship: a national survey of clerkship directors. Teach Learn Med 2007;19:343-346.
20. Speer AJ, Solomon DJ, Fincher RM. Grade inflation in internal medicine clerkships: results of a national survey. Teach Learn Med 2000;12:112-116.
21. Fazio SB, Torre DM, DeFer TM. Grading practices and distributions across internal medicine clerkships. Teach Learn Med 2016;28:286-292.
22. Herrera LN, Khodadadi R, Schmit E, et al. Which student characteristics are most important in determining clinical honors in clerkships? A teaching ward attending perspective. Acad Med 2019; Jun 11. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002836.