Introduction: The hand and upper extremity is one of the most common sites for burn injury. The total body surface area (TBSA) of the hand is small but the resultant impairment can limit a patient’s ability to return to functional independence. Split thickness skin grafting (STSG) has long been supported in the literature as the main means of treatment following full thickness burn injury. Surgical placement of STSG is often followed by a period of immobilization to the grafted area for graft adherence. The length of time which the grafted area is immobilized has evolved over time as surgical methods have improved. There is no set standard to balance the length of time necessary to prevent complications while maintaining functional mobility. A literature review revealed several studies and a meta-analysis examining the optimal timing for immobilization and bedrest following STSG to the lower extremities. Additional studies have examined guidelines for range of motion protocols and splinting as well as reconstructive procedures for improved function following burn injury. There are currently no studies examining the optimal timing for immobility following the placement of STSG and the implications this can have on functional independence. The proposed study details the results of one burn center’s standard of treatment following STSG to the upper extremity.

Methods: Following obtaining approval from the IRB, deidentified data was retrospectively collected from the electronic medical record from January 1, 2014-January 1, 2019 for all inpatients ages 18 and up who underwent split thickness skin grafting to the upper extremity.

Results: Data collected from 2014-2018 revealed a decreasing trend in the days of immobilization following STSG from an average of 4 days to 2 days to the resumption of range of motion (ROM). Additional trends include a decrease in the utilization of splinting as a prophylactic treatment for contractures with a shift towards interventional splinting. Access to home health care services upon hospital discharge also showed a decline from 2014-2018.

Conclusions: The decrease in days of immobilization following STSG combined with the shift from prophylactic to interventional splinting put more emphasis on increasing patient autonomy for functional independence. This trend coincides with a significant decrease in the utilization of home health services upon hospital discharge in the same time period. The findings of this retrospective study provide evidence supporting that decreasing the length of immobilization following STSG to 2 days did not result in an increase in post-operative complications. There was also not a significant decrease in functional independence found with a change in splinting practices from prophylactic to interventional.

Figure 1
Figure2
Figure 3

References and Resources

1. Retrouvey H, Wang A, Corkum, Shahroki. (2018). The Impact of Time of Mobilization After Split Thickness Skin Graft on Lower Extremity Wound Healing-Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Burn Care & Research, 39(6), p.902- 910.
2. Godleski et al. (2013). Treating Burn-Associated Joint Contracture: Results of an Inpatient Rehabilitation Stretching Protocol. Journal of Burn Care & Research, 34(4),p.420-426.
3. Parry et al. (2019). Current Trends in Practice for Early Mobility with the Burn Population. Journal of Burn Care & Research, 40(1),p. 29-33.
4. Mann et al. (2001). Prospective Trial of Thick vs Standard Thickness Skin Grafts in Burns of the Hand. Journal of Burn Care & Research, 22(6),p.390-392.
5. Ahmed et al. (2016). Active range of motion outcomes after reconstruction of burned wrist and hand deformities. BURNS, 42,p.783-789.
6. Schmitt B et al. (2018).The necessity for hand therapy interventions for patients with partial thickness isolated hand/forearm burns: A randomized controlled pilot trial. BURNS Open, 2,p.171-177.
7. McKee D. (2010) Management of Burn injuries to the Hand and Upper Extremity. Journal of Hand Surgery, 35(9),p.1542- 1544.