Original Article

A Comparison of the Adoption of Electronic Health Records in North Carolina and South Carolina HIV Systems

Authors: Charles M. Belden, BA, Rae Jean Proeschold-Bell, PhD

Abstract


Background: The electronic exchange of health records has been a notable topic in recent years in the effort to improve the quality of healthcare delivery and reduce administrative burden. Interviews and documents from stakeholders in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care, and HIV information technology were collected between November 2004 through March 2005 to conduct a qualitative policy analysis on the adoption of an electronic health record (EHR) system among HIV care providers in North Carolina and South Carolina.


Method: Interview data on the current state of EHR use were collected in February through June 2008. The case study analysis included description, categorical aggregation, and naturalistic generalization.


Results: Naturalistic generalizations that emerged were (1) state-level policies can have a significant effect on successful adoption of EHRs; (2) state-level champions are integral to cross-sectoral, multi-institutional EHR adoption; (3) voluntary and mandatory adoption strategies can lead to successful cross-sectoral, multi-institutional EHR implementation.


Conclusion: State health departments can play an integral part in the successful implementation of EHR systems.



This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Improving the Medical Record. The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care. Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 1991.
 
 
2. Chandler D, Meisel J, McGowen M, et al. Client outcomes in two model capitated integrated service agencies. Psychiatr Serv 1996;47:175–180.
 
 
3. Porter AL, Van Cleave BL, Milobowski LA, et al. Clinical Integration: an interdisciplinary approach to a system priority. Nurs Adm Q 1996;20:65–73.
 
4. Ulmer C, Lewis-Idema D, Falik M, et al. Categorical funding seamless systems of care: the challenge for community-based primary care providers. J Case Manag 1997;6:94–103.
 
 
5. Hampson JP, Roberts RI, Morgan DA. Shared care: a review of the literature. Fam Prac t 1996;13:264–279.
 
 
6. Racine AD, Stein RE, Belamarich PF, et al. Upstairs down-stairs-vertical integration of a pediatric service. Pediatrics 1998;102:91–97.
 
7. Ford ES, Cooper RS. Racial/ethnic differences in health care utilization of cardiovascular procedures: a review of the evidence. Health Serv Res 1995;30:237–252.
 
8. Nguyen TQ, Whetten K. Is anybody out there? Integrating HIV services in rural regions. Public Health Rep 2003;118:3–9.
 
9. Ricketts TC, Savitz LA, Gesler WM, et al (eds). Geographic Methods for Health Services Research: A Focus on the Rural-Urban Continuum. New York, University Press of America, Inc, 1994, pp 4.
 
 
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/stateprofiles/usmap.htm. 2008. Accessed March 26, 2010.
 
 
11. US Census Bureau. The Kaiser Family Foundation statehealthfacts.org. Data Source: US Census Bureau Current Population Survey, 2007. http://www.statehealthfacts.org. Accessed March 24, 2010.
 
12. Charmaz K. Grounded theory, in Emerson RM (ed): Contemporary Field Research. Long Grove, Waveland Press, Inc, 2001, pp 335–352.
 
 
13. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, Sage, 1994.
 
 
14. Cresswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, Sage, 1998.
 
 
15. Stake R. The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, Sage, 1995.
 
 
16. Rogers E. Diffusion of Innovations. New York, Free Press, 2003.