Original Article

A Curriculum on Advanced Topics in Hypertension for Internal Medicine Residents

Authors: Benjamin D. Gallagher, MD, Donna M. Windish, MD, MPH

Abstract

Objectives: Hypertension (HTN) affects nearly half of US adults. Our multi-institutional survey revealed that Internal Medicine residents lack proficiency in advanced HTN topics. We developed a curriculum to address knowledge gaps in these topics and aimed to assess the effects of the curriculum on residents’ confidence, desire for future training, and knowledge in advanced HTN topics.

Methods: HTN experts taught four advanced topics in HTN: conducting a workup for secondary HTN, managing HTN in chronic kidney disease, managing HTN in patients who are or may become pregnant, and managing hypertensive urgency (severe asymptomatic HTN) in the outpatient setting. The setting of the curriculum was an ambulatory educational half-day, during which residents rotated through small-group sessions dedicated to each HTN topic. We developed pre-, immediate post-, and 8 weeks postcurriculum surveys assessing residents’ confidence and desire for future training in the four topics (4-point Likert scales), and multiple-choice quizzes to assess changes in knowledge. We used repeated-measures analysis of variance to compare means between time points for surveys and quizzes.

Results: A total of 112 Internal Medicine residents participated in the curriculum. The mean confidence scores for all four topics increased from 1.79 to 2.61 precurriculum to 2.90 to 3.45 immediately postcurriculum (all P < 0.001) and remained higher (2.53–3.18) than precurriculum at 8 weeks postcurriculum (all P < 0.02). The mean desire for future training scores decreased from 2.74 to 2.96 precurriculum to 2.06 to 2.36 immediately postcurriculum (all P < 0.001 except for managing HTN in patients who are or may become pregnant, which was P = 0.17) and remained lower (2.08–2.36) than precurriculum at 8 weeks postcurriculum (all P ≤ 0.003). The mean knowledge score increased from 48% precurriculum to 62% immediate postcurriculum (P < 0.001) and remained higher (55%) than precurriculum at 8 weeks postcurriculum (P = 0.015).

Conclusions: A curriculum on advanced HTN topics produced durable gains in confidence and knowledge and partially satisfied the desire for future learning among Internal Medicine residents.
Posted in: Hypertension17

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Muntner P, Carey RM, Gidding S, et al. Potential US population impact of the 2017 ACC/ AHAHigh Blood Pressure Guideline. Circulation 2018;137:109–118.
 
2. Abdalla M, Bolen S, Brettler J, et al. Implementation strategies to improve blood pressure control in the United States: a Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association and American Medical Association. Hypertension. 2023;80:e143–e157.
 
3. Holliday M, Burnett A, Leavitt M, et al. Evaluation of an academic detailing program to improve blood pressure measurement and hypertension treatment in urban community health centers. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2023;43:e13–e17.
 
4. Evans CE, Haynes RB, Gilbert JR, et al. Educational package on hypertension for primary care physicians. CMAJ 1984;130:719–722. .
 
5. Drexel C, Merlo K, Basile JN, et al. Highly interactive multi-session programs impact physician behavior on hypertension management: outcomes of a new CME model. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2011;13:97–105.
 
6. Inui TS, Yourtee EL, Williamson JW. Improved outcomes in hypertension after physician tutorials. A controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1976;84:646–651.
 
7. Jennett PA, Wilson TW, Hayton RC, et al. Desirable behaviours in the office management of hypertension addressed through continuing medical education. Can J Public Health 1989;80: 359–362.
 
8. Denton GD, Smith J, Faust J, et al. Comparing the efficacy of staff versus housestaff instruction in an intervention to improve hypertension management. Acad Med 2001;76: 1257–1260.
 
9. Siegel D, Lopez J, Meier J, et al. Academic detailing to improve antihypertensive prescribing patterns. Am J Hypertens 2003;16:508–511.
 
10. Herbert CP, Wright JM, Maclure M, et al. Better Prescribing Project: a randomized controlled trial of the impact of case-based educational modules and personal prescribing feedback on prescribing for hypertension in primary care. Fam Pract 2004;21:575–581.
 
11. Simon SR, Majumdar SR, Prosser LA, et al. Group versus individual academic detailing to improve the use of antihypertensive medications in primary care: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Am J Med 2005;118:521–528.
 
12. Fretheim A, Oxman AD, Håvelsrud K, et al. Rational prescribing in primary care (RaPP): a cluster randomized trial of a tailored intervention. PLoS Med 2006;3:e134.
 
13. Horn FE, Mandryk JA, Mackson JM, et al.Measurement of changes in antihypertensive drug utilisation following primary care educational interventions. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2007;16:297–308.
 
14. Stafford RS, Bartholomew LK, Cushman WC, et al. Impact of the ALLHAT/JNC7 Dissemination Project on thiazide-type diuretic use. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:851–858.
 
15. Barbosa H, Prates Caldeira A, Mamede S. Effects of 2 educational interventions on the management of hypertensive patients in primary health care. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2014; 34:243–251. .
 
16. De Rivas B, Barrios V, Redón J, et al. Effectiveness of an interventional program to improve blood pressure vontrol in hypertensive patients at high risk for developing heart failure: HEROIC study. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2010;12:335–344.
 
17. Lüders S, Schrader J, Schmieder RE, et al. Improvement of hypertension management by structured physician education and feedback system: cluster randomized trial. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehab 2010;17:271–279.
 
18. Allaire BT, Trogdon JG, Egan BM, et al. Measuring the impact of a continuing medical education program on patient blood pressure. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2011;13: 517–522.
 
19. Martínez-Valverde S, Castro-Ríos A, Pérez-Cuevas R, et al. Effectiveness of a medical education intervention to treat hypertension in primary care. JEvalClinPract2012;18: 420–425.
 
20. Vallès-Fernández R, Rodriguez-Blanco T, Mengual-Martínez L, et al. Intervention for control of hypertension in Catalonia, Spain (INCOTECA Project): results of a multicentric, non-randomised, quasi-experimental controlled intervention study. BMJ Open 2012;2: e000507.
 
21. Brunström M, Ng N, Dahlström J, et al. Association of physician education and feedback on hypertension management with patient blood pressure and hypertension control. JAMA Network Open 2020;3:e1918625.
 
22. Shaikh U, Petray J, Wisner DH. Improving blood pressure screening and control at an academic health system. BMJ Open Quality 2020;9:e000614.
 
23. Paralkar N, LaVine N, Ryan S, et al. Career plans of internal medicine residents from 2019 to 2021. JAMA Intern Med 2023;183:1166–1167.
 
24. Gallagher BD, Windish DM. State of ambulatory hypertension education in U.S. internal medicine residency programs: a needs assessment survey. J Hypertens 2023;41:678–679.
 
25. Fortun J, Toonkel R, Berrocal Y. Case-based discussion: hypertension. https://www.mededportal.org/doi/full/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9994. Published January 8, 2015. Accessed July 1, 2024.
 
26. Cheng H. Treating older adults with hypertension: when are the guidelines not applicable? https://www.mededportal.org/doi/full/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9994. Published March 31, 2015. Accessed July 1, 2024.
 
27. Alexander A. Hypertension and chronic kidney disease in primary care. MedEdPORTAL 2016;12:10510.
 
28. Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, et al. Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-Step Approach. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2016.
 
29. Accreditation Council for Graduate Internal Medicine. ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Internal Medicine. www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/140_internalmedicine_2023.pdf. Published July 1, 2023. Accessed July 1, 2024.
 
30. Brettler JW, Arcila GPG, Aumala T, et al. Drivers and scorecards to improve hypertension control in primary care practice: recommendations from the HEARTS in the Americas Innovation Group. Lancet Reg Health Am 2022 May;9:None.
 
31. Rosende A, DiPette DJ, Martinez R, et al HEARTS in the Americas clinical pathway. Strengthening the decision support system to improve hypertension and cardiovascular disease risk management in primary care settings. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023;10:1102482.