Original Article

Assessing Correlation of Residency Applicants’ Interview Dates With Likelihood of Matching

Authors: Sameer Avasarala, MD, Elizabeth Thompson, , Sarah Whitehouse, MA, Sean Drake, MD

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to determine whether the timing of an interview relative to the recruitment season was associated with being ranked or matched at an academic medical center.

Methods: Eleven specialties (anesthesiology, diagnostic radiology, emergency medicine, family medicine, general surgery, internal medicine, neurology, neurosurgery, obstetrics-gynecology, orthopedic surgery, and psychiatry) that participated in the National Resident Matching Program were included in the study. Each program’s total number of interview days during the October 2014–January 2015 interview season were divided equally into three interview time periods. The Cochran-Armitage trend test was used to evaluate associations among the three interview time periods (early, middle, and late) and interviewee outcomes (ranked or matched at our institution) for all subjects combined for each of the 11 programs and for specialty groups (medical, surgical, and hospital).

Results: Of 1034 applicants included in the analyses, 60% were men. Most were graduated from US medical schools (59.8%; a total of 103 applicants obtained first-year training positions through the Match [95.4% combined fill rate]). Twenty-nine interviewed early, 38 in the middle, and 36 in the late period (P = 0.3877). A total of 864 applicants were ranked by 1 of the 11 residency programs at the study site: 267 in the early period, 319 in the middle, and 278 in the late period (P = 0.4184). Being ranked in association with specialty classification also showed no significant differences.

Conclusions: Interview timing had no relation to the likelihood of a match or being ranked by 1 of the 11 programs studied at our institution. These findings help dispel misconceptions about the importance of the interview date for a successful match.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. National Resident Matching Program. 2016 Main Residency Match: largest on record. http://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/2016-MRM-infographic.jpg. Published March 2016. Accessed November 9, 2016.
 
2. National Resident Matching Program. Impact of length of rank order list on match results: 2002-2016 Main Residency Match. http://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Impact-of-Length-of-Rank-Order-List-on-Main-Residency-Match-Results.pdf. Published April 28, 2016. Accessed November 9, 2016.
 
3. National Resident Matching Program. Main Residency Match 2016: another banner year! http://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/2016-MRM-infographic-post-SOAP.jpg. Published May 2, 2016. Accessed November 9, 2016.
 
4. National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2016 Main Residency Match. http://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Main-Match-Results-and-Data-2016.pdf. Published April 2016. Accessed November 9, 2016.
 
5. Kerfoot BP, Asher KP, McCullough DL. Financial and educational costs of the residency interview process for urology applicants. Urology 2008;71:990-994.
 
6. Camp CL, Sousa PL, Hanssen AD, et al. The cost of getting into orthopedic residency: analysis of applicant demographics, expenditures, and the value of away rotations. J Surg Educ 2016;73:886-891.
 
7. Blackshaw AM, Watson SC, Bush JS. The cost and burden of the residency match in emergency medicine. West J Emerg Med 2017;18:169-173.
 
8. Agarwal N, Choi PA, Okonkwo DO, et al. Financial burden associated with the residency match in neurological surgery. J Neurosurg 2017;126:184-190.
 
9. Sinno S, Mehta K, Squitieri L, et al. Residency characteristics that matter most to plastic surgery applicants: a multi-institutional analysis and review of the literature. Ann Plast Surg 2015;74:713-717.
 
10. Brothers TE, Wetherholt S. Importance of the faculty interview during the resident application process. J Surg Educ 2007;64:378-385.
 
11. Heidemann DL, Thompson E, Drake SM. Does timing of internal medicine residency interview affect likelihood of matching? South Med J 2016;109:466-470.
 
12. Martin-Lee L, Park H, Overton DT. Does interview date affect match list position in the emergency medicine national residency matching program match? Acad Emerg Med 2000;7:1022-1026.
 
13. McInnis M. When should I schedule residency interviews? http://www.doctorsintraining.com/blog/when-should-i-schedule-residency-interviews. Published October 30, 2013. Accessed January 31, 2017.
 
14. White B. How to schedule residency interviews. http://www.benwhite.com/medicine/how-to-schedule-residency-interviews. Published June 18, 2013. Accessed January 31, 2017.
 
15. Academy of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Interviews. https://www.saem.org/docs/default-source/saem-documents/students/linterviews.pdf?sfvrsn=4. Reviewed April 2009. Accessed January 31, 2017.
 
16. Liang M, Curtin LS, Signer MM, et al. Understanding the interview and ranking behaviors of unmatched international medical students and graduates in the 2013 Main Residency Match. J Grad Med Educ 2015;7:610-616.
 
17. Schweitzer J, Hannan A, Coren J. The role of social networking web sites in influencing residency decisions. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2012;112:673-679.
 
18. McHugh SM, Shaffer EG, Cormican DS, et al. Use of social media resources by applicants during the residency selection process. J Educ Perioper Med 2014;16:E071.
 
19. Wills C, Hern HG, Jr Alter H. Residency applicants prefer online system for scheduling interviews. West J Emerg Med 2015;16:352-354.
 
20. Hern HG, Jr Wills CP, Alter HJ, et al. Residency applicant preferences of online systems for scheduling interviews. J Grad Med Educ 2016;8:759-762.