Background: Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) has been associated with poverty indirectly in the United States with the use of vital statistics data by using proxies of socioeconomic status such as maternal education.
Objectives: The objective of this analysis was to examine the relationship of poverty to SIDS at an ecologic level, by examining the association between poverty within metropolitan counties of the United States and the occurrence of SIDS within those metropolitan counties.
Methods: The percentage of each US county’s population below established federal poverty guidelines (poverty index) was obtained from US Census data for 1990 and 2000 by race (Hispanic-HISP, non-Hispanic white-NHW, and non-Hispanic black-NHB). These data were merged by year of birth, county, and race with US Vital Statistics Linked Birth and Infant Death Certificate data.
Results: Fourth (highest poverty quartile) versus first quartile poverty odds ratios (OR) were significantly increased in 1990 and 2000 for NHB (OR1990 = 1.84, OR2000 = 2.29) and NHW (OR1990 = 1.87, OR2000 = 2.17), but not for HISP (OR1990 = 0.64, OR2000 = 0.59).
Conclusions: There is a significant association between poverty and SIDS at the metropolitan county level for NHB and NHW. Hispanics do not demonstrate this association.
* Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) has been related to proxies of poverty using vital statistics data.
* This analysis uses a direct measure of poverty to show a significant relationship between increasing levels of poverty and SIDS.
* Non-Hispanic blacks and whites demonstrate this relationship, while Hispanics paradoxically do not.
1. Hoyert DL, Heron MP, Murphy SL, Kung HC. Deaths: final data for 2003. Natl Vital Stat Rep2006;54:1–120.
2. Kattwinkel J, Brooks J, Myerberg D. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Infant Positioning and SIDS: Positioning and SIDS. Pediatrics 1992;89:1120–1126.
3. Kattwinkel J, Brooks J, Keenan ME, Malloy M. Infant sleep position and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS): joint commentary from the American Academy of Pediatrics and selected agencies of the Federal government. Pediatrics 1994;93:820.
4. Kattwinkel J, Hauck FR, Keenan ME, et al. The changing concept of sudden infant death syndrome: diagnostic coding shifts, controversies regarding the sleeping environment, and new variables to consider in reducing risk. Pediatrics 2005;116:1245–1255.
5. Malloy MH, MacDorman M. Changes in classification of sudden unexpected infant deaths: United States, 1992–2001. Pediatrics 2005;115:1247–1253.
6. Hoffman HJ, Damus K, Hillman Drongrad E. Risk factors for SIDS: results of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development SIDS cooperative epidemiological study. Ann N Y Acad Sci1988;533:13–30.
7. Malloy MH, Hoffman HJ. Prematurity, sudden infant death syndrome, and age of death. Pediatrics1995;96:464–471.
8. Pickett KE, Luo Ye, Lauderdale DS. Widening social inequalities in risk for sudden infant death syndrome. Am J Public Health 2005;95:1976–1981.
9. Krieger N, Williams DR, Moss NE. Measuring social class in U.S. public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Ann Rev Public Health 1997;18:341–378.
10. Carpenter RG, Irgens LM, Blair PS, et al. Sudden unexplained infant death in 20 regions in Europe: case control study. Lancet 2004;363:185–191.
11. Ford RP, Nelson KP. Higher rates of SIDS persist in low income groups. J Paediatr Child Health1995;31:408–411.
12. Mitchell EA, Stewart AW, Crampton P, Salmond C. Deprivation and sudden infant death syndrome.Soc Sci Med 2000;51:147–150.
13. Mehanni M, Cullen A, Kiberd B, et al. The current epidemiology of SIDS in Ireland. Irish Med J2000;93:264–268.
14. Moore A. Changing patterns of childhood mortality in Wolverhampton. Arch Dis Child 2005;90:687–691.
15. Blair PS, Sidebotham P, Berry PJ, et al. Major epidemiological changes in sudden infant death syndrome: a 20-year population-based study in the UK. Lancet 2006;367:314–319.
16. Spurlock CW, Hinds MW, Skaggs JW, Hernandez CE. Infant death rates among the poor and nonpoor in Kentucky, 1982 to 1983. Pediatrics 1987;80:262–269.
18. Woolbright LA. Postneonatal mortality in Alabama: why no progress in the 90s? Ann Epidemiol2001;11:208–212.
19. Hillemeier MM, Lynch J, Harper S, et al. Relative or absolute standards for child poverty: a state-level analysis of infant and child mortality. Am J Public Health 2003;93:652–657.
20. Finch BK. Early origins of the gradient: the relationship between socioeconomic status and infant mortality in the United States. Demography 2003;40:675–699.
21. Howell EM, Pettit KLS, Kingsley GT. Trends in maternal and infant health in poor urban neighborhoods: good news from the 1990s, but challenges remain. Public Health Rep 2005;120:409–417.
22. McLoyd VC. The impact of economic hardship on black families and children: psychological distress, parenting, and socioemotional development. Child Dev 1990;61:311–346.
23. Brooks-Gunn J, Klebanov P, Smith JR, Lee K. Effects of combining public assistance and employment on mothers and their young children. Women Health 2001;32:179–210.
24. Smith JR, Brooks-Gunn J, Kohen D, McCarton C. Transitions on and off AFDC: implications for parenting and children’s cognitive development. Child Dev 2001;72:1512–1533.
25. Ceballo R, McLoyd VC. Social support and parenting in poor, dangerous neighborhoods. Child Development 2002;73:1310–1321.
29. National Center for Health Statistics. Linked birth/death data set: birth cohort. Public use data file, selected years. Hyattsville, MD: US Public Health Service; issued annually.
31. World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision. Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization, 1979.
32. World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision. Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization, 1992.
34. Hans SL. Demographic and psychosocial characteristics of substance-abusing pregnant women.Clin Perinatol 1999;26:55–74.
35. Hess CR, Papas MA, Black MM. Resilience among African American adolescent mothers: predictors of positive parenting in early infancy. J Pediatric Psych 2002;27:619–629.
36. Serbin LA, Karp J. The intergenerational transfer of psychosocial risk: mediators of vulnerability and resilience. Ann Rev Psych 2004;55:333–363.
38. Markides KS, Coreil J. The health of Hispanics in the Southwestern United States: an epidemiologic paradox. Public Health Rep 1986;101:253–265.
39. Becerra JE, Hogue CJ, Atrash HK. Infant mortality among Hispanics: a portrait of heterogeneity.JAMA 1991;265:217–221.
40. Alexander GR, Kogan M, Bader D, et al. US birth weight/gestational age-specific neonatal mortality: 1995–1997 rates for whites, Hispanics, and blacks. Pediatrics 2003;111:e61–e66.
41. Gee SC, Lee ES, Forthofer RN. Ethnic differentials in neonatal and postnatal mortality: a birth cohort analysis by a binary variable multiple regression method. Soc Biol 1976;23:317–325.
42. Bradley RH, Mundfrom DJ, Whiteside L, et al. A factor analytic study of the infant-toddler and early childhood versions of the HOME inventory administered to white, black, and Hispanic American parents of children born preterm. Child Dev 1994;65:880–888.