Current Concepts

Automated Hematology: Where We Stand

Authors: EDWARD S. RAPPAPORT MD, BARBARA HELBERT MT(ASCP), ROBERT S. BEISSNER PhD, MD, ARTHUR TROWBRIDGE MD

Abstract

ABSTRACT; Rapid, accurate, and relevant laboratory testing is essential in an era of cost-effective medicine. The routine manual complete blood count (CBC) is a labor-intensive test that lacks reproducibility. The new automated instruments such as the Coulter S+ series offer “state of the art” precision and accuracy in counting more than 10,000 cells per blood sample. The nonoptical electronic impedance method yields RBC, WBC, and platelet data, as well as histograms that characterize hematologic data. Analysis of more than 3,500 cases yielded a false-negative rate of <4% and a false-positive rate of 30%, indicating the instruments accuracy in recognizing and flagging abnormalities. All normal screened CBCs were free of significant abnormalities. The Coulter S+ series provides innovative parameters and histograms that aid in establishing differential diagnoses. We review the advantages and the limitations of automation. Morphologic examination of abnormal blood smears remains the cornerstone of diagnosis in both the new and the old hematology.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References