Editorial

Bedside Medicine: Back to the Future?

Authors: Andrew Elder, MD, Abraham Verghese, MD

Abstract

There is a newfound interest in bedside diagnosis; however, we are hesitant to call it a movement. Perhaps the best signal that the pendulum is swinging back comes from the Institute of Medicine’s report Improving Diagnosis in Health Care,1 which states, “There are growing concerns that traditional “bedside evaluation” skills (history, interview, and physical examination) have received less attention due to the large growth in diagnostic testing in medicine … these methods were once the primary tools for diagnosis and clinical evaluation, but the recent explosion of imaging and laboratory testing has inverted the diagnostic paradigm. [Clinicians] often bypass the bedside evaluation for immediate testing.” The report continues, “A careful physical exam can help a clinician refine the next steps in the diagnostic process, can prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing, and can aid in building trust with the patient ….” We share these views. The bedside is where the patient is, and diagnosis needs to begin there.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. Washington, DC:The National Academies Press;2015.
 
2. Ouyang D, Chen JH, Hom J, et al. Internal medicine resident computer usage: an electronic audit of an inpatient service. JAMA Intern Med 2016;176:252-254.
 
3. Czernik Z, Lin CT. A piece of my mind. Time at the bedside (computing). JAMA 2016;315:2399-2400.
 
4. Elder AT. In praise of clinical examinations. Clin Med (Lond) 2014;14:460-461.
 
5. McGee S. Teaching evidence-based physical diagnosis: six bedside lessons. South Med J 2016;109:738-742.
 
6. Frenkel J, Chen HC, ten Cate O. Patient-centered teaching in a technology-dominated era. South Med J 2016;109:743-746.
 
7. Russell SW, Garibaldi BT. The other Sylvian fissure: exploring the divide between traditional and modern bedside rounds. South Med J 2016;109:747-749.
 
8. Kugler J. Point-of-care ultrasound in internal medicine: challenges and opportunities for expanding use. South Med J 2016;109:750-753.
 
9. Zaman J, Verghese A, Elder A. The value of physical examination: a new conceptual framework. South Med J 2016;109:754-757.