1. Phillips AW, Friedman BT, Utrankar A, et al. Surveys of health professions trainees: prevalence, response rates, and predictive factors to guide researchers. Acad Med 2017;92:222–228.
2. Artino AR, Phillips AW, Utrankar A, et al. The questions shape the answers: assessing the quality of published survey instruments in health professions education research. Acad Med 2018;93:456–463.
3. Phillips AW, Artino MA Jr. Lies, damned lies, and surveys. J Grad Med Educ 2017;9:677–679.
5. Rickards G, Magee C, Artino AR Jr. You can’t fix by analysis what you’ve spoiled by design: developing survey instruments and collecting validity evidence. J Grad Med Educ 2012;4:407–410.
6. Artino AR Jr, La Rochelle JS, Dezee KJ, et al. Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE guide no. 87. Med Teach 2014;36:463–474.
7. Sullivan GM, Artino AR Jr. How to create a bad survey instrument. J Grad Med Educ 2017;9:411–415.
8. Krosnick JA. Survey research. Annu Rev Psychol 1999;5:537–567.
9. Streiner DL, Normal GR, Cariney J. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015.
10. Barnette JJ. Effects of stem and Likert response option reversals on survey internal consistency: if you feel the need, there is a better alternative to using those negatively worded stems. Educ Psychol Meas 2000;60:361–370.
11. Likert RA. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 1932;140:1–55.
12. Liu M, Lee S, Conrad FG. Comparing extreme response styles between agree-disagree and item-specific scales. Public Opin Q 2015;79:952–975.
13. Saris WE, Krosnick JA, Revilla M, et al. Comparing questions with agree/ disagree response options to questions with item-specific response options. Surv Res Methods 2010;4:61–79.
14. Revilla MA, Saris WE, Krosnick JA. Choosing the number of categories in agree–disagree scales. Sociol Methods Res 2014;43:73–97.
15. Krosnick JA, Holbrook A, Berent M, et al. The impact of “no opinion” response options on data quality: non-attitude reduction or an invitation to satisfice? Public Opin Q 2002;66:371–403.
16. Bishop GF. Experiments with the middle response alternative in survey questions. Public Opin Q 1987;51:220–232.
17. Liu M, Keusch F. Effects of scale direction on response style of ordinal rating scales. J Off Stat 2017;33:137–154.
18. Sonderen E, Sanderman R, Coyne JC. Ineffectiveness of reverse wording of questionnaire items: let’s learn from cows in the rain. PLoS One 2013;8:e68967.
19. The GenIUSS Group. Best Practices for Asking Questions to Identify Transgender and Other Gender Minority Respondents on Population-Based Surveys. Los Angeles: The Williams Institute; 2014.
20. Cull WL, O’Connor KG, Sharp S, et al. Response rates and response bias for 50 surveys of pediatricians. Health Serv Res 2005;40:213–226.
21. Grava-Gubins I, Scott S. Effects of various methodologic strategies: survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training. Can Fam Physician 2008;54:1424–1430.
22. Palla B, Callahan N, Miloro M. One survey to rule them all. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020;10:31215–5.
23. Christof VM. Improving web survey efficiency: the impact of an extra reminder and reminder content on web survey response. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2017;20:317–327.
24. Phillips AW, Reddy S, Durning SJ. Improving response rates and evaluating nonresponse bias in surveys: AMEE guide no. 102. Med Teach 2016;38:217–228.
25. Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM. Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons;2002.
26. Halbesleben JR, Whitman MV. Evaluating survey quality in health services research: a decision framework for assessing nonresponse bias. Health Serv Res 2013;48:913–930.
27. American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys, 9th ed. Lenexa, KS: American Association for Public Opinion Research; 2016.
28. Groves RM. Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opin Q 2006;70:646–675.
29. Meyer HS, Durning SJ, Sklar D, et al. Making the first cut: an analysis of Academic Medicine editors’ reasons for not sending manuscripts out for external peer review. Acad Med 2018;93:464–470.
30. Artino AR Jr, Durning SJ, Sklar DP. Guidelines for reporting survey-based research submitted to Academic Medicine. Acad Med 2018;93:337–340.
31. McKenzie J, Wood ML, Kotecki JE, et al. Establishing content validity: using qualitative and quantitative steps. Am J Health Behav 1999;23:311–318.
32. Willis GB, Artino AR. What do our respondents think we’re asking? Using cognitive interviewing to improve medical education surveys. J Grad Med Educ 2013;5:353–356.
33. Artino AR, Durning SJ, Creel AH. AM Last Page: reliability and validity in educational measurement. Acad Med 2010;85:1545.