Original Article

Clinical Context and Detection of the Murmur of Advanced Aortic Stenosis

Authors: Ajoe John Kattoor, MD, Anusha Shanbhag, MD, Annette Abraham, MBBS, Srikanth Vallurupalli,MD

Abstract

Objectives: Auscultation is an important clue to the presence of aortic stenosis (AS). We sought to assess the effect of symptom status, prior knowledge of diagnosis, and other patient factors on murmur detection.

Methods: Patients with moderate-to-severe AS by echocardiography at a single center between June 2015 and June 2016 were included. Five consecutive patient encounters (inpatient and outpatient) within 12 months before the echocardiogram were analyzed.

Results: Ninety-five patients (418 different clinician encounters) were studied. The murmur of AS was identified by only 39% of clinicians. In multivariate analysis, significant determinants of murmur detection were examination in outpatient setting (odds ratio [OR] 3.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.75–6.61), known history of AS (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.53–5.01), female sex (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.07–3.60), and presence of symptoms (OR 1.91 95% CI 1.12–3.26). Compared with the murmur detection findings by clinicians in medicine, the findings of surgical specialty clinicians were significantly lower (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.06–0.26, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: In this real-world assessment, clinical context played an important role in the auscultation of AS murmur. The findings have important implications for the clinical diagnosis of asymptomatic advanced AS.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Roldan CA, Shively BK, Crawford MH. Value of the cardiovascular physical examination for detecting valvular heart disease in asymptomatic subjects. Am J Cardiol 1996;77:1327-1331.
 
2. Jauhar S. The demise of the physical exam. N Engl J Med 2006;354:548-551.
 
3. Mangione S, Nieman LZ. Cardiac auscultatory skills of internal medicine and family practice trainees. A comparison of diagnostic proficiency. JAMA 1997;278:717-722.
 
4. Verghese A, Charlton B, Kassirer JP, et al. Inadequacies of physical examination as a cause of medical errors and adverse events: a collection of vignettes. Am J Med 2015;128:1322-4. e3.
 
5. Sibbald M, Panisko D, Cavalcanti RB. Role of clinical context in residents' physical examination diagnostic accuracy. Med Educ 2011;45:415-421.
 
6. Beasley TM, Schumacker RE. Multiple regression approach to analyzing contingency tables: post hoc and planned comparison procedures. J Exp Educ 1995;64:79-93.
 
7. Chiang SJ, Daimon M, Miyazaki S, et al. When and how aortic stenosis is first diagnosed: a single-center observational study. J Cardiol 2016;68:324-328.
 
8. Loxdale SJ, Sneyd JR, Donovan A, et al. The role of routine pre-operative bedside echocardiography in detecting aortic stenosis in patients with a hip fracture. Anaesthesia 2012;67:51-54.