The Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) is the official, peer-reviewed journal of the Southern Medical Association. It has a multidisciplinary and inter-professional focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists.

SMJ // Article

Original Article

Combined Ambulatory and Inpatient Pediatric Clerkship Leads to Higher Shelf Scores and Improved Student Preparedness

Authors: John Szymusiak, MD, Dhivyaa Rajasundaram, PhD, Brent Schlegel, BS, Andrew Nowalk, MD, PhD

Abstract

Objective: Data are lacking on the effect of pediatric clerkship duration on National Board of Medical Examiners pediatric shelf examination scores. Our school has recently changed its clerkship structure, transitioning from separate ambulatory and inpatient clerkships with examination at the end of each clerkship to a combined 8-week ambulatory and inpatient clerkship with a single examination. We hypothesized that students in the split model would score higher on their second shelf attempt and ambulatory students would score higher than those with inpatient first. We hypothesized that the combined clerkship model would yield higher shelf scores than aggregate scores in the split model.

Methods: Examination scores for the split versus combined clerkship model were analyzed. Students completed surveys assessing their comfort caring for pediatric patients before and after the change in clerkship structure.

Results: Students from the split (n = 361) and combined (n = 250) models were analyzed. For the survey, 110 students (44%) responded from the split model and 193 (77%) from the combined model. Combined model had statistically significant (P < 0.05) higher National Board of Medical Examiners scores than the split model. This was driven by a lower score (P < 0.001) on the second attempt compared with combined or the first time. Students who took inpatient first scored significantly higher than those who took ambulatory first in the split model. Surveys showed significantly higher comfort (P < 0.05) in the combined clerkship.

Conclusions: Understanding how to maximize student comfort caring for pediatric patients and scores on the shelf examination are important for curriculum design and for continuing to attract students to the specialty.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. American Association of Medical Colleges. Clerkship week requirements by curriculum year. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/curriculum-reports/interactive-data/clerkship-week-requirements-curriculum-year. Published 2022. Accessed December 16, 2022.
 
2. Case SM, Ripkey DR, Swanson DB. The effects of psychiatry clerkship timing and length on measures of performance. Acad Med 1997;72(10 Suppl 1):S34–S36.
 
3. Lind DS, Marum T, Ledbetter D, et al. The effect of the duration and structure of a surgery clerkship on student performance. J Surg Res 1999;84:106–111.
 
4. Ouyang W, Cuddy MM, Swanson DB. US medical student performance on the NBME Subject Examination in Internal Medicine: do clerkship sequence and clerkship length matter? J Gen Intern Med 2015;30:1307–1312.
 
5. Monrad SU, Zaidi NLB, Gruppen LD, et al. Does reducing clerkship lengths by 25% affect medical student performance and perceptions? Acad Med 2018;93:1833–1840.
 
6. Niedermier J, Way D, Kasick D, et al. Effect of curriculum change on exam performance in a 4-week psychiatry clerkship. Acad Psychiatry 2010;34:216–219.
 
7. American Academy of Pediatrics. Survey: most residents who choose pediatrics do so in medical school. https://publications.aap.org/aapnews/news/31398?utm_source=MagnetMail&utm_%20medium=email&utm_term=PA_OnCall&utm_campaign=OnCall-Weds_March19_2025?%20autologincheck=redirected. Published March 1, 2025. Accessed March 25, 2025.
 
8. American Association of Medical Colleges. Guiding principles for the Education in Pediatrics Across the Continuum (EPAC) Project. https://www.aamc.org/about-us/mission-areas/medical-education/cbme/epac/guiding-principles. Published October 12, 2012. Accessed March 25, 2025.
 
9. Masava B, Nyoni CN, Botma Y. Scaffolding in health sciences education programmes: an integrative review. Med Sci Educ 2023;33:255–273.
 
10. Moulaert V, Verwijnen MGM, Rikers R, et al. The effects of deliberate practice in undergraduate medical education. Med Educ 2004;38:1044–1052.
 
11. Brown PC. Make it Stick: The Science of Successful Learning. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press; 2014: 313 p.
 
12. Julian ER. Validity of the Medical College Admission Test for predicting medical school performance. Acad Med 2005;80:910–917.
 
13. Lombardi CV, Chidiac NT, Record BC, et al. USMLE step 1 and step 2 CK as indicators of resident performance. BMC Med Educ 2023;23:543.
 
14. Zahn CM, Saguil A, Artino ARJ, et al. Correlation of National Board of Medical Examiners scores with United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and Step 2 scores. Acad Med 2012;87:1348–1354.
 
15. National Board of Medical Examiners. Pediatrics Subject Exam-Content Outline. https://www.nbme.org/subject-exams/clinical-science/pediatrics. Published 2023. Accessed August 23, 2023. .
 
16. Walters L, Greenhill J, Richards J, et al. Outcomes of longitudinal integrated clinical placements for students, clinicians and society. Med Educ 2012;46:1028–1041.
 
17. Vinci RJ. The pediatric workforce: recent data trends, questions, and challenges for the future. Pediatrics 2021;147:e2020013292.